Digital Filters for Phasor Measurement Units: Design Criteria, Advantages and Limitations

The synchrophasor estimation model suggested in Annex D of the IEEE/IEC Standard 60255-118-1:2018 is based on the direct frequency down-conversion of 50-Hz or 60-Hz AC signals followed by two low-pass filters in parallel: one for the inphase component and the other for the quadrature component, respectively. However, the filter specifications reported in the Standard rely on the rather optimistic and questionable assumption that dynamic fluctuations and steady-state disturbances are mutually exclusive. This paper instead, after a critical review of such specifications, provides more conservative criteria for filter design and reports the results obtained with two minimum-order equiripple FIR filters conceived for Class P and Class M applications, respectively. Several simulation results show that, even if the proposed filter-based estimators exhibit worse accuracy than another state-of-the-art dynamic estimator in the individual testing conditions reported in the IEEE/IEC Standard, TVE compliance is met in any case and with a lower computational burden. Moreover, and more importantly, the estimation accuracy achievable by using suitable filters can be kept under tight control even under the combined effect of multiple steady-state and dynamic fluctuations.

[1]  Dario Petri,et al.  A Simple Time-Domain Algorithm for Synchrophasor, Frequency and ROCOF Estimation , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC).

[2]  Carmine Landi,et al.  A Low-Voltage Measurement Testbed for Metrological Characterization of Algorithms for Phasor Measurement Units , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[3]  K. E. Martin,et al.  Improving phasor measurements under power system oscillations , 2003 .

[4]  J. Thorp,et al.  A New Measurement Technique for Tracking Voltage Phasors, Local System Frequency, and Rate of Change of Frequency , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[5]  J. H. Chow,et al.  Second Harmonic Filtering in Phasor Measurement Estimation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[6]  Dario Petri,et al.  Design criteria of digital filters for synchrophasor estimation , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC).

[7]  Graeme M. Burt,et al.  Filters for M class Phasor Measurement Units , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS) Proceedings.

[8]  Geza Joos,et al.  Compliance Analysis of PMU Algorithms and Devices for Wide-Area Stabilizing Control of Large Power Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Daniel Belega,et al.  Dynamic Phasor and Frequency Measurements by an Improved Taylor Weighted Least Squares Algorithm , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[10]  Miodrag D. Kusljevic,et al.  Multiple-Resonator-Based Power System Taylor-Fourier Harmonic Analysis , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[11]  Dario Petri,et al.  Accuracy of DFT-based synchrophasor estimators at off-nominal frequencies , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS).

[12]  H.J. Altuve,et al.  A new digital filter for phasor computation. II. Evaluation , 1997, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Power Industry Computer Applications.

[13]  Daniel Belega,et al.  Frequency estimation by two- or three-point interpolated Fourier algorithms based on cosine windows , 2015, Signal Process..

[14]  Dario Petri,et al.  A Frequency-Domain Algorithm for Dynamic Synchrophasor and Frequency Estimation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[15]  José Antonio de la O. Serna,et al.  Dynamic Harmonic Analysis Through Taylor–Fourier Transform , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[16]  J. A. de la O Serna,et al.  A new digital filter for phasor computation. I. Theory , 1997, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Power Industry Computer Applications.

[17]  José Antonio de la O. Serna,et al.  Dynamic Phasor and Frequency Estimates Through Maximally Flat Differentiators , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[18]  Andrew J. Roscoe,et al.  Exploring the Relative Performance of Frequency-Tracking and Fixed-Filter Phasor Measurement Unit Algorithms Under C37.118 Test Procedures, the Effects of Interharmonics, and Initial Attempts at Merging P-Class Response With M-Class Filtering , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[19]  Guglielmo Frigo,et al.  Compressive Sensing of a Taylor-Fourier Multifrequency Model for Synchrophasor Estimation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[20]  Carmine Landi,et al.  A Tuned Lightweight Estimation Algorithm for Low-Cost Phasor Measurement Units , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[21]  Andrew J. Roscoe,et al.  Filter Design Masks for C37.118.1a-Compliant Frequency-Tracking and Fixed-Filter M-Class Phasor Measurement Units , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[22]  Leonardo Rey Vega,et al.  Optimal Differentiator Filter Banks for PMUs and Their Feasibility Limits , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[23]  D. Dallet,et al.  Estimation of the Multifrequency Signal Parameters by Interpolated DFT Method with Maximum Sidelobe Decay , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE Workshop on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications.

[24]  José Antonio de la O. Serna,et al.  Dynamic Phasor Estimates for Power System Oscillations , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.