Ranking of Business Process Simulation Software Tools with DEX/QQ Hierarchical Decision Model

The omnipresent need for optimisation requires constant improvements of companies’ business processes (BPs). Minimising the risk of inappropriate BP being implemented is usually performed by simulating the newly developed BP under various initial conditions and “what-if” scenarios. An effectual business process simulations software (BPSS) is a prerequisite for accurate analysis of an BP. Characterisation of an BPSS tool is a challenging task due to the complex selection criteria that includes quality of visual aspects, simulation capabilities, statistical facilities, quality reporting etc. Under such circumstances, making an optimal decision is challenging. Therefore, various decision support models are employed aiding the BPSS tool selection. The currently established decision support models are either proprietary or comprise only a limited subset of criteria, which affects their accuracy. Addressing this issue, this paper proposes a new hierarchical decision support model for ranking of BPSS based on their technical characteristics by employing DEX and qualitative to quantitative (QQ) methodology. Consequently, the decision expert feeds the required information in a systematic and user friendly manner. There are three significant contributions of the proposed approach. Firstly, the proposed hierarchical model is easily extendible for adding new criteria in the hierarchical structure. Secondly, a fully operational decision support system (DSS) tool that implements the proposed hierarchical model is presented. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed hierarchical model is assessed by comparing the resulting rankings of BPSS with respect to currently available results.

[1]  Changyun Li,et al.  A BPM Software Evaluation Method , 2012 .

[2]  Marko Bohanec,et al.  DEX: An Expert System Shell for Decision Support • , 1990 .

[3]  Janez Grad,et al.  A methodology for business process improvement and IS development , 2008, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[4]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Simulation software: not the same yesterday, today or forever , 2006, J. Simulation.

[5]  Raymond J. Madachy,et al.  Software process simulation modeling: Why? What? How? , 1999, J. Syst. Softw..

[6]  Rajendra M. Sonar,et al.  Evaluating and selecting software packages: A review , 2009, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[7]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Tillal Eldabi,et al.  Simulation in manufacturing and business: A review , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Integration of Product, Process and Functional Orientations: Principles and a Case Study , 2002, APMS.

[10]  Zoltán Baracskai,et al.  Automated fuzzy-clustering for doctus expert system , 2003 .

[11]  Roland Kaschek,et al.  Characterization and Tool Supported Selection of Business Process Modeling Methodologies , 2007 .

[12]  Mh Monique Jansen-Vullers,et al.  Business process simulation - tool survey , 2006 .

[13]  Susanne Patig,et al.  A pattern-based approach for the verification of business process descriptions , 2013, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[14]  Manuel Laguna,et al.  Business Process Modeling, Simulation and Design , 2004 .

[15]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  A robust decision-making methodology for evaluation and selection of simulation software package , 2010 .

[16]  L. Changyun,et al.  A BPM Software Evaluation Method , 2012, 2012 Second International Conference on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Application.

[17]  M. Bohanec,et al.  Evaluating options by combined qualitative and quantitative methods , 1992 .

[18]  Bedir Tekinerdogan,et al.  Empirical evaluation of a decision support model for adopting software product line engineering , 2015, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[19]  Ping-Yu Hsu,et al.  A fuzzy-based decision-making procedure for data warehouse system selection , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Biljana Mileva Boshkoska From Qualitative to Quantitative Evaluation Methods in Multi-criteria Decision Models , 2014 .

[21]  Oleg I. Larichev,et al.  Ranking multicriteria alternatives: The method ZAPROS III , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Jim Sinur Magic Quadrant for Business Process Management Suites , 2009 .

[23]  DamijNadja,et al.  A methodology for business process improvement and IS development , 2008 .

[24]  Shuai Ding,et al.  Decision Support for Personalized Cloud Service Selection through Multi-Attribute Trustworthiness Evaluation , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  Yannis Siskos,et al.  Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Talib Damij,et al.  Process Management: A Multi-disciplinary Guide to Theory, Modeling, and Methodology , 2013 .

[27]  Vlatka Hlupic,et al.  Criteria for the evaluation of business process simulation tools , 2007 .