Preferred book formats in an academic medical center.

Learning more about when and why medical students, faculty, and clinical staff use e-books, as opposed to print books, is an expanding area of research for health sciences librarians. Several studies have highlighted the heavy use of health sciences titles in campus e-book collections [1–5] and the book format preferences of medical and other health sciences students [2, 6, 7]. A recent case study by Shurtz and von Isenburg is one of the first to explore e-book use in both health sciences educational and clinical settings [8]. As of June 2010, The Ohio State University (OSU) Prior Health Sciences Library offered more than 6,000 health and life sciences e-books. E-book usage has increased every year driven by Core25 Books, a browsable e-book promotions tool developed at the Prior Library, the ability to link to e-book chapters via the online course management system, and the distribution of the latest in mobile device technologies by OSU to incoming health sciences students and residents. During recent patron-driven e-book selection projects conducted at OSU, medical and life sciences books ranked at the top of subjects selected. Even with the growing emphasis on e-books at OSU, many questions remained about format usability and customer preferences. This exploratory study proposed to: (1) identify the book format preferences of customers in education, research, and patient care settings of an academic health sciences center; (2) discover factors that influence customer format selection; and (3) offer suggestions to librarians involved in the selection and delivery of health sciences books.

[1]  E. Strother,et al.  Dental students' attitudes towards digital textbooks. , 2009, Journal of dental education.

[2]  Arlis Dittmer,et al.  TEXTBOOKS ON TAP: Using Electronic Books Housed in Handheld Devices in Nursing Clinical Courses , 2009, Nursing education perspectives.

[3]  S. Berg,et al.  Not on the Same Page: Undergraduates' Information Retrieval in Electronic and Print Books. , 2010 .

[4]  L. Connaway,et al.  A circulation analysis of print books and E-books in an academic research library , 2004 .

[5]  Suzanne Shurtz,et al.  Exploring e-readers to support clinical medical education: two case studies. , 2011, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[6]  Marc Langston,et al.  The California State University E-book Pilot Project: implications for cooperative collection development&& , 2003 .

[7]  Nancy Hrinya Tannery,et al.  Use of Web-based library resources by medical students in community and ambulatory settings. , 2002, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[8]  L. Appleton The use of electronic books in midwifery education: the student perspective. , 2004, Health information and libraries journal.

[9]  Timothy P. Bailey Electronic Book Usage at a Master's Level I University: A Longitudinal Study , 2006 .

[10]  Taryn Resnick,et al.  Assessing print and electronic use of reference/core medical textbooks. , 2008, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[11]  E. Kimes,et al.  Evaluation of Vancomycin TDM Strategies: Prediction and Prevention of Kidney Injuries Based on Vancomycin TDM Results , 2023, Journal of Korean medical science.