Consumers' Attitude Change Across Sequences of Successful and Unsuccessful Product Usage

In two experiments we examine how consumers are affected by a sequence composed of an initial product-failure experience followed by a success experience. Our interest is to assess how consumers' evaluation of the product and of their own performance change after the second experience. A preliminary experiment used hypothetical scenarios describing consumers' experiences with different products. In the main experiment, participants received actual hands-on experience with a Smith-Corona Personal Typewriter/Word Processor. A major result was that product evaluations could be as high following a failure-success sequence of experiences as following success alone. This was especially true with hands-on experiences. However, the main experiment showed that negative affect (frustration) expressed following an actual product failure experience remained even after a subsequent success. Marketing implications of these dual results are discussed.

[1]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Response Determinants in Satisfaction Judgments , 1988 .

[2]  William R. Swinyard,et al.  Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Impact of Product Trial versus Advertising: , 1983 .

[3]  Rolph E. Anderson.  Consumer Dissatisfaction: The Effect of Disconfirmed Expectancy on Perceived Product Performance , 1973 .

[4]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Memory and Attentional Factors in Consumer Choice: Concepts and Research Methods , 1982 .

[5]  Eric N. Johnson.  Effects of information order, group assistance, and experience on auditors' sequential belief revision , 1995 .

[6]  I. Levin,et al.  Differential weighting of positive and negative traits in impression formation as a function of prior exposure. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[8]  Lawrence J. Marks,et al.  The Use of Product Sampling and Advertising: Effects of Sequence of Exposure and Degree of Advertising Claim Exaggeration on Consumers’ Belief Strength, Belief Confidence, and Attitudes , 1988 .

[9]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Order effects in belief updating with consistent and inconsistent evidence , 1993 .

[10]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Delivering quality service : balancing customer perceptions and expectations , 1990 .

[11]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Preferences Scientific.  Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. , 1982 .

[13]  I. Levin,et al.  How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product , 1988 .

[14]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[15]  William R. Swinyard,et al.  The Effects of Mood, Involvement, and Quality of Store Experience on Shopping Intentions , 1993 .

[16]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Effects of Expectation Creation and Disconfirmation on Belief Elements of Cognitive Structure , 1976 .

[17]  R. Oliver.  Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: An alternative interpretation. , 1977 .

[18]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction , 1982 .

[19]  R. Olshavsky,et al.  Consumer Expectations, Product Performance, and Perceived Product Quality , 1972 .

[20]  Ruth N. Bolton,et al.  Mitigating the effect of service encounters , 1992 .

[21]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Consumer Learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience , 1986 .

[22]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.