This report identifies passenger car occupant safety issues that can be
considered priorities for injury mitigation through secondary safety
interventions. The results are relevant to a newer car fleet designed to meet
the current regulatory and consumer test requirements. Some suggestions were made for secondary safety interventions but the
general conclusion for all areas was that more understanding of the injury
mechanisms, further enhanced biomechanical data, and improved dummy
bio-fidelity were required before the most effective countermeasures
(including both changes in regulation and vehicle design) could be determined
and their respective benefits quantified.
The main conclusion from this study is that whilst various priority areas have
been identified and some secondary safety interventions suggested, the
benefit that these would have in mitigating injury is unclear since some injury
mechanisms are still largely undefined. It would be inadvisable to simply
implement design solutions/develop new regulation without due consideration
to the shortfall in current biomechanical knowledge and the limitations of the
current test procedures/tools in predicting injury outcome under real world
crash conditions.
In addition to the main study, a pilot driver survey was carried out to gain
knowledge of public opinion and perception of car safety as an influencing
factor in vehicle purchase. This survey demonstrated a potential methodology
but the results are limited due to the small sample size.
This report is intended as a summary of the extensive work that has been
undertaken for the project. There are a number of substantial appendices
which document the in-depth research undertaken on which this summary
report is based.
The project was conducted in a number of stages. Issues have been identified
through analysis of national and in-depth accident data sets, through
workshops held with experts in the field of vehicle safety (Project Consultative
Group), and through a review of the literature. Throughout the project
consultations have been held with the Department for Transport.
National accident data highlighted the continued importance of car occupant
injury mitigation within the accident constellation. Further priority areas for
passenger car occupants were then defined primarily according to the
frequency of the injury, the cost to society of the injury, and through the
existing knowledge base across members of the Project Consultative Group
(PCG).
A total of 18 priority areas have emerged relating to injury mitigation in frontal,
side, rear, rollover and multiple impact configurations. Additionally, 6 areas
were identified concerned with associated issues such as vulnerable road
users. For each of these an indication of the extent of current research activity
is given and recommendations made for further actions that could be
undertaken to advance the current knowledge.
Consensus was sought among the PCG members for 5 leading priority areas
and the potential for injury mitigation through secondary safety intervention by
means of vehicle design or regulatory compliance was explored by means of
a workshop. These 5 areas were femur fractures in frontal impact, foot/ankle
injuries in frontal impacts, chest injuries in struck side impacts, whiplash in
frontal impacts and rear occupant protection in frontal impacts.
[1]
J Broughton,et al.
The numerical context for setting national casualty reduction targets
,
2000
.
[2]
B. Sexton,et al.
CYCLE HELMET WEARING IN 2002
,
2003
.
[3]
Jan Goffin,et al.
Bicycle-related head injury: a study of 86 cases.
,
2004,
Accident; analysis and prevention.
[4]
Sartre.
EUROPEAN drivers and traffic safety
,
1994
.
[5]
A. Davis.
A Briefing Paper for the Regional Cycling Development Team
,
2003
.
[6]
Adrian Cook.
Mind your head
,
2004
.
[7]
J. Davidson.
Epidemiology and outcome of bicycle injuries presenting to an emergency department in the United Kingdom
,
2005,
European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.
[8]
W J Curnow,et al.
The efficacy of bicycle helmets against brain injury.
,
2003,
Accident; analysis and prevention.
[9]
K. Hansen,et al.
Protective Effect of Different Types of Bicycle Helmets
,
2003,
Traffic injury prevention.
[10]
Pete Thomas,et al.
Real-world crash performance of recent model cars: next steps in injury prevention
,
2003
.
[11]
Elizabeth M. L. Towner,et al.
BICYCLE HELMETS - A REVIEW OF THEIR EFFECTIVENESS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
,
2002
.