HIRF Transfer Function Observations: Notes on Results Versus Requirements and Certification Approach

HIRF transfer functions results are rarely available to the public. Generally, the data provided in applicable guidance material are used for estimation of internal HIRF environment in an air vehicle. An exemplary set of HIRF transfer functions for a small aircraft is presented here. Results for the aircraft (10.4-m wingspan and 8.3 m of length) are compared with regard to state of the art approaches applied for aircraft HIRF certification campaigns. This is done in appropriate frequency ranges and by the use of applicable test methods with regard to requirements in place. For all major types of contemporary test methods, results are generated by measurement and numerical computer modeling. Principles of outcomes are discussed and compared to current practice in place. This concerns the shapes of the transfer functions on one hand and the order of magnitudes of obtained levels on the other hand. The obtained results show significant deviations from generic transfer functions currently applied in aircraft industry. The coupling to the interior of the aircraft observed here was higher than indicated by the applicable generic transfer functions. Numerical computer modeling is used here to verify the obtained outcomes by principle.

[1]  S. E. Loos,et al.  Evaluation of radiated transfer functions of a fuselage model in an anechoic and in a reverberating Radio Frequency environment , 2012, 2012 ESA Workshop on Aerospace EMC.

[2]  A. Wraight,et al.  Convolution techniques used for the prediction of induced current , 2005, IEEE 6th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility and Electromagnetic Ecology, 2005..

[3]  Dominique Lemaire,et al.  A unified approach for lightning and low frequencies HIRF transfer functions measurements on A380 , 2009, 2009 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC Europe.

[4]  Guido A. Rasek,et al.  Analysis of High Intensity Radiated Field Coupling into Aircraft Using the Method of Moments , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[5]  Chriss A. Grosvenor,et al.  Electromagnetic penetration studies for three different aircraft , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[6]  Robert Fisher,et al.  Parametric Evaluation of Absorption Losses and Comparison of Numerical Results to Boeing 707 Aircraft Experimental HIRF Results , 2014 .

[7]  A. Wraight,et al.  Phase Processing Techniques for the Prediction of Induced Current , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[8]  Enrique Pascual-Gil,et al.  HIRF Virtual Testing on the C-295 Aircraft: On the Application of a Pass/Fail Criterion and the FSV Method , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[9]  M. B. Alexander,et al.  Electronic systems failures and anomalies attributed to electromagnetic interference , 1995 .

[10]  S. E. Loos,et al.  TD and FD simulations of internal EM environment in small aircraft and experimental test comparison , 2012, 2012 6th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[11]  Guido A. Rasek,et al.  Wire bundle currents for High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF) and Indirect Effects of Lightning (IEL) with focus on Bulk Current Injection (BCI) test , 2011, Proceedings of 21st International Conference Radioelektronika 2011.

[12]  G.A. Rasek,et al.  Correlation of Direct Current Injection (DCI) and Free-Field Illumination for HIRF Certification , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[13]  Robert Fisher,et al.  Evaluation of complexity of wire harness models in a HIRF environment , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.