Genetic analysis of the mating system of the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) in New Zealand farmland

We examined male reproductive success in a common brushtail possum population in New Zealand farmland. Paternity was assigned to 66 of 91 pouch young (maternity known), using a likelihood approach applied to genotypes at six microsatellite loci having an overall average exclusion probability of around 99%. The distribution of number of offspring per male was L‐shaped with a standardized variance of 1.52. At least 46% of the 76 sampled reproductively mature males, bred, siring between one and four offspring each. Although breeding males were on average older and larger than nonbreeding males, the small differences did not result in a significant overall difference between the two groups in a multivariate permutation test analagous to a t‐test. Paternity analysis of 22 sibling pairs (resulting from experimental removal of pouch young early in the breeding season, inducing a second oestrous) suggested that sequential mating of females with the same male was uncommon (≈ 16–27%). Whilst there was a tendency for female possums to mate with nearby males, consistent with previous observations of territorial mating behaviour in Australian populations, some interhabitat matings were also inferred. The study population displayed only a low degree of polygyny, which may in part reflect population and habitat characteristics of the study site. A comprehensive understanding of the mating system of Trichosurus vulpecula awaits genetic paternity analysis in additional populations from both Australia and New Zealand, using quantitative approaches undertaken in this study.

[1]  J. Bamford Estimating fat reserves in the brush-tailed possum, Trichosurus vulpecula Kerr (Marsupialia : Phalangeridae) , 1970 .

[2]  J. Goudet FSTAT (Version 1.2): A Computer Program to Calculate F-Statistics , 1995 .

[3]  P. Livingstone,et al.  Bovine tuberculosis control and eradication programs in Australia and New Zealand. , 1994, Veterinary microbiology.

[4]  D. Coltman,et al.  Male mating success in an aquatically mating pinniped, the harbour seal (Phoca vitulina), assessed by microsatellite DNA markers , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[5]  R. B. Selander,et al.  BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics , 1981 .

[6]  J. Winter The behaviour and social organisation of the brush-tail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula: Kerr) , 1976 .

[7]  E. Spurr,et al.  Social dominance and breeding success in captive brushtail possums,Trichosurus vulpecula , 1999 .

[8]  P. Cowan Possum biocontrol: prospects for fertility regulation. , 1996, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[9]  T. C. Marshall,et al.  Statistical confidence for likelihood‐based paternity inference in natural populations , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[10]  M. Efford,et al.  Sex differences in the dispersal and settlement of brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) , 1984 .

[11]  H. Marsh,et al.  Enhancement of reproductive success through mate choice in a social rock-wallaby, Petrogale assimilis (Macropodidae) as revealed by microsatellite markers , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure , 1993 .

[13]  P. Cowan,et al.  Effects of vaccination against gonadotrophin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) on the social status of brushtail possums in captivity , 1996 .

[14]  François Rousset,et al.  GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenicism , 1995 .

[15]  K. Summers,et al.  Behavioral, ecological, and molecular genetic analyses of reproductive strategies in the Amazonian dart-poison frog, Dendrobates ventrimaculatus , 1997 .

[16]  D. Overstreet,et al.  Aggressive and Nonaggressive Interactions among Captive Populations of the Brush-Tail Possum, Trichosurus vulpecula (Marsupialia: Phalangeridae) , 1978 .

[17]  S. Altmann,et al.  A FIELD STUDY OF THE SOCIOBIOLOGY OF RHESUS MONKEYS, MACACA MULATTA * , 1962, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  D. Cooper,et al.  Microsatellite markers for the Phalangerid marsupial, the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[19]  J. Nason,et al.  Understanding the population genetic structure of Gleditsia triacanthos L.: seed dispersal and variation in female reproductive success , 1998 .

[20]  M. Clout Determination of age in the brushtail possum using sections from decalcified molar teeth , 1982 .

[21]  M. Nei,et al.  Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. , 1978, Genetics.

[22]  G. Orians On the Evolution of Mating Systems in Birds and Mammals , 1969, The American Naturalist.

[23]  N. Barlow,et al.  Predicting the effect of a novel vertebrate biocontrol agent: a model for viral-vectored immunocontraception of New Zealand possums , 1994 .

[24]  S. Emlen,et al.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. , 1977, Science.

[25]  P. Sunnucks,et al.  Numerous transposed sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I-II in aphids of the genus Sitobion (Hemiptera: Aphididae). , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[26]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin , 1957 .

[27]  R. Brockie,et al.  Possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) on Hawke's Bay farmland: Spatial distribution and population structure before and after a control operation , 1997 .

[28]  R Jackson,et al.  The epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infections. , 1994, Veterinary microbiology.

[29]  S. E. Jolly,et al.  Biological control of possums , 1993 .

[30]  R. Gemmell Effect of melatonin and removal of pouch young on the seasonality of births in the marsupial possum, Trichosurus vulpecula. , 1987, Journal of reproduction and fertility.