Working within and beyond the Cochrane Collaboration to make systematic reviews more useful to healthcare managers and policy makers.

Participants in the Cochrane Collaboration conduct and periodically update systematic reviews that address the question, "What works?" for healthcare interventions. The Cochrane Library makes available quality-appraised systematic reviews that address this question. No coordinated effort has been undertaken to conduct and periodically update systematic reviews that address the other types of questions asked by healthcare managers and policy makers, to adapt existing reviews to highlight decision-relevant information (including the factors that may affect assessments of a review's local applicability) or to facilitate their retrieval through a "one-stop shopping" portal. Researchers interested in evaluating new methodological developments, health services and policy researchers interested in conducting and adapting systematic reviews, and research funders all have a role to play in making systematic reviews more useful for healthcare managers and policy makers.

[1]  Keith Hurst,et al.  What Works? Evidence‐based Policy and Practice in Public Services , 2003 .

[2]  Michael H. Zaroukian,et al.  PubMed clinical queries , 2001 .

[3]  G. Smith,et al.  1 Rationale, potentials, and promise of systematic reviews , 2001 .

[4]  G H Guyatt,et al.  A Consumer's Guide to Subgroup Analyses , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  Pauline Allen,et al.  On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research. , 2003, The Milbank quarterly.

[6]  Andy Haines,et al.  Use of research to inform public policymaking , 2004, The Lancet.

[7]  N. Black,et al.  Public accountability: one rule for practitioners, one for scientists? , 2001, Journal of health services research & policy.

[8]  Jonathan Lomas,et al.  Using research to inform healthcare managers' and policy makers' questions: from summative to interpretive synthesis. , 2005, Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante.

[9]  Karen Golden-Biddle,et al.  Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[10]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[11]  Ross S Bailie,et al.  Making systematic reviews more useful for policy-makers. , 2005, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[12]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context: Second Edition , 2008 .

[13]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  R. Haynes,et al.  Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  David R. Jones,et al.  Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods , 2005 .

[16]  J. Popay,et al.  Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[17]  M. Gardner,et al.  More informative abstracts revisited. , 1990, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[18]  Trevor A Sheldon,et al.  Making evidence synthesis more useful for management and policy-making , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.