Chapter 15 Apportionment

Publisher Summary This chapter describes apportionment. Apportionment determines the number of seats each state will receive. Redistricting refers to the drawing of congressional district boundaries within a state, one for each representative. The districts should have approximately ‘equal populations'. These considerations place severe restrictions on the districting plans, and make districting a quite difficult computational problem. All of the major historical methods except Hamilton's fall into the specific computational framework implied by a common divisor. The approach to measure bias suggests a mathematical model for theoretical analysis. Mathematics, through the axiomatic method, gives a precise statement about the consistency or inconsistency and thus provides a sensible basis for choosing the method that seems right for a given application. Population monotonicity implies house monotonicity. Not only do the Hamilton and Quota methods violate population monotonicity, so does any method that satisfies quota.

[1]  H P Young,et al.  The Webster method of apportionment. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Michel Balinski,et al.  Algorithms for proportional matrices in reals and integers , 1989, Math. Program..

[3]  M. L. Balinski,et al.  Criteria for Proportional Representation , 1979, Oper. Res..

[4]  Michel Balinski,et al.  On Huntington Methods of Apportionment , 1977 .

[5]  Victor D'Hondt Système pratique et raisonné de représentation proportionnelle , 1882 .

[6]  Michel Balinski,et al.  Apportioning the United States House of Representatives , 1983 .

[7]  E V Huntington,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of the Apportionment of Representatives. , 1921, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Martin Shubik,et al.  A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System , 1954, American Political Science Review.

[9]  Michel Balinski,et al.  An Axiomatic Approach to Proportionality Between Matrices , 1989, Math. Oper. Res..

[10]  Svetlozar T. Rachev,et al.  Rounding Proportions:Rules of Rounding , 1993 .

[11]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities , 1987, Math. Oper. Res..

[12]  M L Balinski,et al.  A new method for congressional apportionment. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Michel Balinski,et al.  Apportionment Schemes and the Quota Method , 1977 .

[14]  Michel Balinski,et al.  Fair Representation in the European Parliament , 1982 .

[15]  G. Birkhoff,et al.  House monotone apportionment schemes. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  J P Mayberry Quota methods for congressional apportionment are still non-unique. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. L. Balinski,et al.  Quotatone Apportionment Methods , 1979, Math. Oper. Res..

[18]  D. Hill,et al.  The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws , 1969 .

[19]  F. W. Owens On the Apportionment of Representatives , 1921 .

[20]  W. Willcox,et al.  THE APPORTIONMENT OF REPRESENTATIVES. , 1928, Science.

[21]  H. Young Measuring the Compactness of Legislative Districts , 1988 .

[22]  Michel Balinski,et al.  Stability, Coalitions and Schisms in Proportional Representation Systems , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[23]  E. V. Huntington The apportionment of representatives in Congress , 1928 .

[24]  Michel Balinski,et al.  The Quota Method of Apportionment , 1975 .

[25]  H. Young,et al.  Distributive justice in taxation , 1988 .

[26]  David A. Freedman,et al.  On Rounding Percentages , 1979 .

[27]  Michel Balinski,et al.  The Jefferson Method of Apportionment , 1978 .

[28]  Jonathan W. Still A Class of New Methods for Congressional Apportionment , 1979 .

[29]  Oscar R. Burt,et al.  Letter to the Editor—Apportionment of the U.S. House of Representatives: A Minimum Range, Integer Solution, Allocation Problem , 1963 .