Family Assessment: Instrument Dimensionality and Correspondence Across Family Reporters

Based on the contention that clarifying the psychometric foundations of family instruments is essential to the field's future progress, the current study pursued 3 major aims: examining issues of instrument dimensionality; determining the generalizability of dimensional structures across whole-family, marital, and parent-child forms; and assessing the degree to which there is correspondenc e across different members' reports. Drawing on a community sample of intact families (N = 192) and making use of a latent-variable approach, results provided support for a 3dimensional framework (Affect, Activities, and Control) in accounting for score variance on whole-family, marital, and parent-child forms. Results indicated a significant degree of correspondenc e across different members' reports of these constructs for each family subsystem. Implications of these findings are discussed, and topics in need of further research attention are identified. The field of family studies includes a range of research activities conducted by behavioral and social scientists from basic, applied, and interdisciplinary programs of study. Regardless of disciplinary identification, theoretical orientation, or substantive focus, however, all such researchers must ultimately select, revise, or develop measurement procedures in order to operationalize key family constructs they wish to investigate. It is for this reason that clarifying the psychometric foundations of family instruments is an essential prerequisite for the field's future progress.

[1]  D. Olson Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems , 2000 .

[2]  R. Hoyle Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications , 1997 .

[3]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  Advanced structural equation modeling : issues and techniques , 1996 .

[4]  L. Benjamin Introduction to the special section on structural analysis of social behavior. , 1996, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[5]  R. Parke,et al.  Exploring Family Relationships With Other Social Contexts , 1994 .

[6]  S. Fortmann,et al.  Who shall quit? Comparison of volunteer and population-based recruitment in two minimal-contact smoking cessation studies. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  G. Patterson Depression and Aggression in Family interaction , 1994 .

[8]  Dawn M. Gondoli,et al.  Factor structure within and across three family-assessment procedures , 1993 .

[9]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[10]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness of Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[11]  H W Marsh,et al.  Overcoming Problems in Confirmatory Factor Analyses of MTMM Data: The Correlated Uniqueness Model and Factorial Invariance. , 1992, Multivariate behavioral research.

[12]  Steven W. Duck,et al.  Studying Interpersonal Interaction , 1992 .

[13]  R. Sabatelli,et al.  An examination of the factor structure of the family environment scale , 1990 .

[14]  K. Wentzel,et al.  A comparison of the views of mothers, fathers, and pre-adolescents about family cohesion and power. , 1989 .

[15]  S. Mulaik,et al.  EVALUATION OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDICES FOR STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS , 1989 .

[16]  R. Moos,et al.  The process of recovery from alcoholism: III. Comparing functioning in families of alcoholics and matched control families. , 1984, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[17]  H. Skinner,et al.  The Family Assessment Measure , 1983 .

[18]  D. Kiesler The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. , 1983 .

[19]  P. C. Fowler Factor structure of the Family Environment Scale: effects of social desirability. , 1982, Journal of clinical psychology.

[20]  J. Druckman A Family-Oriented Policy and Treatment Program for Female Juvenile Status Offenders. , 1979 .

[21]  P. Karoly,et al.  Training parents in behavior modification: Effects on perceptions of family interaction and deviant child behavior * , 1977 .

[22]  L. Benjamin Structural analysis of social behavior. , 1974 .

[23]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .

[24]  E. Thoma Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality , 1965 .

[25]  R. Bales,et al.  Family, socialization and interaction process , 1956 .

[26]  H. Marsh,et al.  An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. , 1996 .

[27]  P. Bentler,et al.  Evaluating model fit. , 1995 .

[28]  S. Fiske,et al.  Personality Research, Methods, and Theory : A Festschrift Honoring Donald W. Fiske , 1995 .

[29]  Lee J. Cronbach,et al.  Giving method variance its due. , 1995 .

[30]  P. Cowan,et al.  Prebirth to Preschool Family Factors in Children's Adaptation to Kindergarten , 1994 .

[31]  Carl A. Ridley,et al.  Multiple perspectives on interaction: Participants, peers, and observers. , 1991 .

[32]  L. Bank,et al.  Method variance in structural equation modeling: Living with "glop" , 1990 .

[33]  D. Bagarozzi Family measurement techniques , 1984 .

[34]  Froma Walsh,et al.  Normal family processes. , 1982 .

[35]  P. C. Fowler Maximum likelihood factor structure of the family environment scale , 1981 .

[36]  A. L. Scoresby,et al.  Differences in Interaction and Environmental Conditions of Clinic and Non‐Clinic Families: Implications for Counselors , 1976 .

[37]  E. Foa,et al.  Societal Structures of the Mind , 1974 .

[38]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Analyzing psychological data by structural analysis of covariance matrices , 1974 .