Learning a foreign language with a learner response system: the students' perspective

This paper reports the results of a study on the use of a learner response system (LRS) by a group of students of English as a foreign language (L2). Via a methodology that included the analysis of survey questionnaires and open-ended oral interviews, the study examined learners' perceptions of the use of an LRS by a group of 30 Brazilians learning English in a communicative classroom environment. Overall, the results are consistent with the consensus that students perceive the response system as a positive addition to their classes, as its use increases participation and the general enjoyment of classes, contributes to learning, fosters interactions, and allows learners to self-assess and compare their performance with that of their peers. Because research on LRS in L2 settings is still in its infancy, this paper contributes data and analysis that highlight the pedagogical benefits of the implementation of a response system in L2 pedagogy.

[1]  William McKendree Boyd,et al.  Repeating Questions in Prose Learning. , 1973 .

[2]  Euline Cutrim Schmid.  Using a voting system in conjunction with interactive whiteboard technology to enhance learning in the English language classroom , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Christina Hoffman,et al.  A clicker for your thoughts: technology for active learning , 2006 .

[4]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  Effects of Multimedia Annotations on Vocabulary Acquisition , 1996 .

[5]  John Barnett,et al.  Implementation of personal response units in very large lecture classes: Student perceptions , 2006 .

[6]  Diane M. Bunce,et al.  Comparing the Effectiveness on Student Achievement of a Student Response System versus Online WebCT Quizzes , 2006 .

[7]  H. Gardner.  Multiple intelligences : the theory in practice , 1993 .

[8]  Scott Thornbury,et al.  How to Teach Vocabulary , 2002 .

[9]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[10]  Ofelia R. Nikolova.  Effects of Students' Participation in Authoring of Multimedia Materials on Student Acquisition of Vocabulary. , 2002 .

[11]  C. Doughty.  Cognitive Underpinnings of Focus on Form , 1999 .

[12]  Tina Marie Sartori.  An empirical investigation of electronic student response systems in a K--12 school district: The relationship of ongoing assessment on student achievement , 2008 .

[13]  Richard H. Hall,et al.  A Student Response System for Increasing Engagement, Motivation, and Learning in High Enrollment Lectures , 2005, AMCIS.

[14]  Erica Suchman,et al.  Evaluating the impact of a classroom response system in a microbiology course. , 2006, Microbiology education.

[15]  Dina L. Blodgett.  The Effects of Implementing an Interactive Student Response System in a College Algebra Classroom , 2006 .

[16]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[17]  Ronald P. Leow,et al.  Awareness, different learning conditions, and second language development , 2004, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[18]  Margaret I. Brown,et al.  Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[19]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[20]  Kerry Hart.  Multiple Intelligences , 1999 .

[21]  MaryAnn Christison.  Multiple Intelligences: Teaching the Whole Student. , 1999 .

[22]  Arianne M. Dantas,et al.  Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system. , 2009, Advances in physiology education.

[23]  M. Swain,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Negative Feedback , 1993, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[24]  R. Dekeyser.  The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency , 1993 .

[25]  Chet Meyers,et al.  Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom , 1993 .

[26]  Azizollah Dabaghi.  Corrective feedback in second languge acquisition : theory, research and practice , 2010 .

[27]  Rod Ellis,et al.  1. Implicit and Explicit Learning, Knowledge and Instruction , 2009 .

[28]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition , 1987 .

[29]  L Halloran,et al.  A comparison of two methods of teaching. Computer managed instruction and keypad questions versus traditional classroom lecture. , 1995, Computers in nursing.

[30]  Angel Hoekstra.  Vibrant student voices: exploring effects of the use of clickers in large college courses , 2008 .

[31]  J. Bruner.  The act of discovery. , 1961 .

[32]  Derek O. Bruff,et al.  Teaching with Classroom Response Systems: Creating Active Learning Environments , 2009 .

[33]  Chryso Pelekani,et al.  Language-teaching methodology , 2009 .

[34]  L. A. MacManaway.  Teaching methods in higher education–innovation and research , 1970 .

[35]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Empowering or compelling reluctant participators using audience response systems , 2007 .

[36]  P. Skehan.  语言学习认知法 = A cognitive approach to language learning , 1998 .

[37]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[38]  Robert DeKeyser,et al.  Learning Second Language Grammar Rules , 1995, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[39]  Raphael Littauer,et al.  Instructional Implications of a Low-Cost Electronic Student Response System. , 1972 .

[40]  Carla Carnaghan,et al.  Investigating the Effects of Group Response Systems on Student Satisfaction, Learning and Engagement in Accounting Education , 2007 .

[41]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Results from a Range of Classrooms , 2002 .

[42]  R. Barnard.  Cognition and Second Language Instruction , 2003 .

[43]  Barbara Stewart,et al.  InterChemNet: Integrating Instrumentation, Management, and Assessment in the General Chemistry Laboratory Course , 2006 .

[44]  W. Lynch.  Multiple Intelligences: Howard Gardner (New York: Basic Books, 1993) , 1995 .

[45]  William B Wood,et al.  Teaching more by lecturing less. , 2005, Cell biology education.

[46]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active learning : creating excitement in the classroom , 1991 .

[47]  Eugene Judson,et al.  Learning from Past and Present: Electronic Response Systems in College Lecture Halls , 2002 .

[48]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university‐level courses using student response systems , 2007 .

[49]  Michael Levy,et al.  Computer applications in second language acquisition : Foundations for teaching , testing and research , 2009 .

[50]  B. Skinner,et al.  Technology of Teaching , 1967, Nature.

[51]  Amy Meckelborg,et al.  Student Response Systems: A Cure for Lecturalgia? , 2008 .

[52]  Dorris E. Boardman.  THE USE OF IMMEDIATE RESPONSE SYSTEMS IN JUNIOR COLLEGE. , 1968 .

[53]  Robert S. Feldman,et al.  Promoting Active Learning Using Individual Response Technology in Large Introductory Psychology Classes , 2007 .

[54]  Sandra J. Savignon,et al.  Initiatives in Communicative Language Teaching , 1989 .

[55]  Alice Jenkins.  Technique and Technology: Electronic Voting Systems in an English Literature Lecture , 2007 .

[56]  Euline Cutrim Schmid.  Enhancing performance knowledge and self-esteem in classroom language learning: The potential of the ACTIVote component of interactive whiteboard technology , 2007 .

[57]  David A. Banks,et al.  Audience Response Systems in Higher Education: Applications and Cases. , 2006 .

[58]  Euline Schmid Cutrim,et al.  Using a voting system in conjunction with interactive whiteboard technology to enhance learning in the English language classroom , 2008 .

[59]  Catherine Easton,et al.  An Examination of Clicker Technology Use in Legal Education , 2009, J. Inf. Law Technol..

[60]  Jill A. Marshall,et al.  Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature , 2006 .

[61]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication , 1996 .

[62]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[63]  R. Schmidt.  The role of consciousness in second language learning , 1990 .

[64]  J. Poulis,et al.  Physics lecturing with audience paced feedback , 1998 .

[65]  W. Penuel,et al.  Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: A survey study , 2007 .

[66]  Cynthia Desrochers,et al.  Student Response Technology: Empirically grounded or just a gimmick? , 2008 .

[67]  R. Mayer.  Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[68]  Michèle Shuster,et al.  Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.