Robust Decision-Making in the Water Sector: A Strategy for Implementing Lima?S Long-Term Water Resources Master Plan

How can water resource agencies make smart investments to ensure long-term water reliability when the future is fraught with deep climate and economic uncertainty? This study helped SEDAPAL, the water utility serving Lima, Peru, answer this question by drawing on state of the art methods for decision making under deep uncertainty. These methods provide techniques for evaluating the performance of a water system over a wide range of plausible futures and then developing strategies that are robust across these futures. Rather than weighting futures probabilistically to define an optimal strategy, these methodologies identify the vulnerabilities of a system and then evaluate the key trade-offs among different adaptive strategies. Through extensive iteration and collaboration with SEDAPAL, the study used these methods to define an investment strategy that is robust, ensuring water reliability across as wide a range of future conditions as possible while also being economically efficient. First,on completion, the study helped SEDAPAL realize that not all projects included in the Master Plan were necessary to achieve water reliability, and the utility could save 25 percent (more than $600 million) in investment costs. Second, the study helped focus future efforts on demand-side management, pricing, and soft infrastructure, a refocusing that is difficult to achieve in traditional utility companies. Third, the study helped SEDAPAL gain the support of regulatory and budget agencies through the careful analysis of alternatives. Fourth, the study allowed the utility to postpone lower priority investments, and to analyze future options based on climate and demand information that simply is not available now.

[1]  David G. Groves,et al.  A New Analytic Method for Finding Policy-Relevant Scenarios: , 2007 .

[2]  J. Plöger Gated barriadas: Responses to urban insecurity in marginal settlements in Lima, Peru , 2012 .

[3]  D. Yates,et al.  WEAP21—A Demand-, Priority-, and Preference-Driven Water Planning Model , 2005 .

[4]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Agreeing on Robust Decisions: New Processes for Decision Making Under Deep Uncertainty , 2014 .

[5]  David G. Groves,et al.  Developing Key Indicators for Adaptive Water Planning , 2015 .

[6]  Casey Brown,et al.  The End of Reliability , 2010 .

[7]  David R. Purkey,et al.  Integrating a Climate Change Assessment Tool into Stakeholder-Driven Water Management Decision-Making Processes in California , 2006 .

[8]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Adaptive policies, policy analysis, and policy-making , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  J. Prairie,et al.  Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study , 2012 .

[10]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world , 2013 .

[11]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Ensuring Robust Flood Risk Management in Ho Chi Minh City Robert Lempert Nidhi Kalra , 2013 .

[12]  D. Pierson,et al.  Examination of change factor methodologies for climate change impact assessment , 2011 .

[13]  C. Swartz,et al.  Decision Support System for Sustainable Water Supply Planning , 2006 .

[14]  Joanne L. Isaac Out of the mist , 2008 .

[15]  Benjamin P. Bryant,et al.  Thinking Inside the Box , 2010 .

[16]  Jon Ritterbush,et al.  World Weather Information Service , 2013 .

[17]  B. Joyce,et al.  Climate warming, water storage, and Chinook salmon in California’s Sacramento Valley , 2008 .

[18]  CASEY BROWN,et al.  Decision-scaling for Robust Planning and Policy under Climate Uncertainty World Resources Report Uncertainty Series , 2011 .

[19]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[20]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[21]  David G. Groves,et al.  Strengthening Coastal Planning: How Coastal Regions Could Benefit from Louisiana's Planning and Analysis Framework , 2014 .

[22]  David G. Groves,et al.  Adapting to a Changing Colorado River , 2013 .

[23]  Casey Brown,et al.  Decision scaling: Linking bottom‐up vulnerability analysis with climate projections in the water sector , 2012 .

[24]  R. Lempert,et al.  Identifying and evaluating robust adaptive policy responses to climate change for water management agencies in the American west , 2010 .

[25]  Rikard Liden,et al.  Enhancing the climate resilience of Africa's infrastructure : the power and water sectors , 2015 .

[26]  M. Hulme,et al.  Assessing the robustness of adaptation decisions to climate change uncertainties: A case study on water resources management in the East of England , 2007 .

[27]  N. Kalra,et al.  Developing Robust Strategies for Climate Change and Other Risks , 2014 .

[28]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Making Good Decisions Without Predictions: Robust Decision Making for Planning Under Deep Uncertainty , 2013 .

[29]  R. Lempert,et al.  Presenting Uncertainty About Climate Change to Water-Resource Managers , 2008 .

[30]  D. Groves,et al.  Planning Tool to Support Planning the Future of Coastal Louisiana , 2013 .

[31]  I. Grossmann Informing Decisions in a Changing Climate. By the National Research Council. Washington (DC): National Academies Press. $46.00 (paper). xi + 188 p.; no index. ISBN: 978‐0‐309‐13737‐9. 2009. , 2011 .

[32]  D. Finegold Book and Resource Reviews , 2005 .

[33]  Jarrod Goentzel,et al.  Games for a new climate: experiencing the complexity of future risks , 2012 .

[34]  Casey Brown,et al.  A Decision‐Analytic Approach to Managing Climate Risks: Application to the Upper Great Lakes 1 , 2011 .