Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jonathan Robinson,et al. TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences , 2016, Behavior Research Methods.
[2] Jesse J. Chandler,et al. Inside the Turk , 2014 .
[3] U. Fischbacher,et al. Lies in Disguise. An experimental study on cheating , 2013 .
[4] M. Schraefel,et al. “Now that you mention it”: A survey experiment on information, inattention and online privacy , 2017 .
[5] Hyunji Kim,et al. The Interrelations Between Social Class, Personal Relative Deprivation, and Prosociality , 2016, Social psychological and personality science.
[6] Daniel Burton Shank,et al. Using Crowdsourcing Websites for Sociological Research: The Case of Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2016 .
[7] Thomas Stöckl,et al. On the provision of incentives in finance experiments , 2018 .
[8] David G. Rand,et al. Economic Games on the Internet: The Effect of $1 Stakes , 2011, PloS one.
[9] A. Acquisti,et al. Beyond the Turk: Alternative Platforms for Crowdsourcing Behavioral Research , 2016 .
[10] Antonio A. Arechar,et al. Conducting interactive experiments online , 2017, Experimental Economics.
[11] Ben Greiner,et al. Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE , 2015, Journal of the Economic Science Association.
[12] Stephanie Cacioppo,et al. Measuring the Prevalence of Problematic Respondent Behaviors among MTurk, Campus, and Community Participants , 2016, PloS one.
[13] Jesse Chandler,et al. Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.
[14] John Bohannon,et al. PSYCHOLOGY. Mechanical Turk upends social sciences. , 2016, Science.
[15] Siddharth Suri,et al. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.
[16] David G. Rand,et al. The promise of Mechanical Turk: how online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.
[17] Duncan J. Watts,et al. Cooperation and Contagion in Web-Based, Networked Public Goods Experiments , 2010, SECO.
[18] Richard N. Landers,et al. An Inconvenient Truth: Arbitrary Distinctions Between Organizational, Mechanical Turk, and Other Convenience Samples , 2015, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
[19] J. Yeluripati,et al. Impact of Spatial Soil and Climate Input Data Aggregation on Regional Yield Simulations , 2016, PloS one.
[20] David Huffman,et al. Reference Points and Effort Provision , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[21] David G. Rand,et al. The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market , 2010, ArXiv.
[22] Ben R. Newell,et al. The average laboratory samples a population of 7,300 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers , 2015, Judgment and Decision Making.
[23] Charles Spence,et al. ‘Show me the goods’: Assessing the effectiveness of transparent packaging vs. product imagery on product evaluation , 2018 .
[24] Andreas Heinz,et al. Changes in the Provision of Institutionalized Mental Health Care in Post-Communist Countries , 2012, PloS one.
[25] D. Cooper. A Note on Deception in Economic Experiments* , 2014, Journal of Wine Economics.
[26] Michael D. Buhrmester,et al. Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[27] Todd M. Gureckis,et al. Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a Tool for Experimental Behavioral Research , 2013, PloS one.
[28] Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al. Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.
[29] Hans-Theo Normann,et al. Experienced vs. inexperienced participants in the lab: do they behave differently? , 2017 .
[30] Daniel L. Chen,et al. oTree - An Open-Source Platform for Laboratory, Online, and Field Experiments , 2016 .
[31] Andreas Nicklisch,et al. hroot: Hamburg Registration and Organization Online Tool , 2014 .