Why do doctors and patients not follow guidelines?

Purpose of reviewThe aim of this review is to evaluate the factors related to the doctor and the patient that could make following the guidelines difficult. It also underlines the importance of the adherence to guidelines themselves in order to ameliorate both the control of healthcare and the patients' quality of life. Recent findingsFollowing guidelines not only depend on factors related to guidelines themselves, to social–cultural context or to the strategies used to spread them: different studies have underlined that the characteristics linked to the doctor's and patient's subjectivity are crucial. SummaryGuidelines are recommendations regarding clinical behaviour, and their implementation is a complex process that is influenced by different factors, related both to the characteristics of guidelines themselves and to the social, organizational, economic and political context or to implementation strategies. During the last few years, different studies and theories have tried to explain the reason why doctors and patients do not follow the guidelines. Following the guidelines most of all depends on the characteristics linked to the doctor's and patient's subjectivity, which can be a real obstacle. Knowledge, attitude, skills, experiences, believes and values play a fundamental role both in physician and patient. By addressing these issues to physician's and patient's adherence, more exhaustive approaches to guidelines development and spread can be applied in order to improve care and outcomes.

[1]  O. Norheim,et al.  "What lies beneath it all?" – an interview study of GPs' attitudes to the use of guidelines , 2008, BMC health services research.

[2]  K. Grimmer-Somers,et al.  The effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies--a synthesis of systematic review findings. , 2008, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[3]  Anke J. E. de Veer,et al.  Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: A systematic meta-review , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[4]  F. Saillour-Glénisson,et al.  [Combined quantitative and qualitative methods to identify local facilitators of and barriers to physician's adherence to clinical practice guidelines]. , 2008, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[5]  G. Viegi,et al.  Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) 2008 * , 2008, Allergy.

[6]  B. Hedblad,et al.  Barriers to adherence to hypertension guidelines among GPs in southern Sweden: A survey , 2008, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[7]  J Bousquet,et al.  Methodology for development of the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma Guideline 2008 update , 2007, Allergy.

[8]  Rafael Perera,et al.  Hypertension guideline recommendations in general practice: awareness, agreement, adoption, and adherence. , 2007, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[9]  J. Lowery,et al.  An observational study of the effectiveness of practice guideline implementation strategies examined according to physicians' cognitive styles , 2007, Implementation science : IS.

[10]  Cynthia G. Ayres,et al.  Perceived barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of priority clinical preventive services guidelines. , 2007, The American journal of managed care.

[11]  Michael K Gould,et al.  An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. , 2006, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[12]  Laura Petersen,et al.  Does Pay-for-Performance Improve the Quality of Health Care? , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  Michel Wensing,et al.  The relationship between organisational characteristics and the effects of clinical guidelines on medical performance in hospitals, a meta-analysis , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[14]  T. Zuberbier,et al.  EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF guideline: management of urticaria , 2006, Allergy.

[15]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group , 2004, BMC health services research.

[16]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  S. K. Maue,et al.  Predicting physician guideline compliance: an assessment of motivators and perceived barriers. , 2004, The American journal of managed care.

[18]  A. Bandura.  Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means , 2004, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[19]  S. De Geest,et al.  Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action , 2003, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[20]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care , 2003, The Lancet.

[21]  M. Cabana,et al.  Physician adherence to preventive cardiology guidelines for women. , 2003, Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health.

[22]  RA Aroni,et al.  Sticky issue of adherence , 2003, Journal of paediatrics and child health.

[23]  D R Black,et al.  Using social marketing to develop and test tailored health messages. , 2001, American journal of health behavior.

[24]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[25]  Siep Thomas,et al.  Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study , 1998, BMJ.

[26]  A. Taylor-Vaisey,et al.  Translating guidelines into practice: a systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines , 1997 .

[27]  W. Shannon,et al.  Clinical guidelines: their implementation in general practice. , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[28]  E M Rogers,et al.  Lessons for guidelines from the diffusion of innovations. , 1995, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[29]  A. Ellrodt,et al.  Measuring and Improving Physician Compliance with Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Controlled Interventional Trial , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[30]  J Lomas,et al.  Evaluating the Message: The Relationship Between Compliance Rate and the Subject of a Practice Guideline , 1994, Medical care.

[31]  P. R. Manning.  Changing and Learning in the Lives of Physicians , 1990 .

[32]  Donald S. Napoli,et al.  The Origins of Behaviorism: American Psychology, 1870-1920 , 1986 .

[33]  F. Saillour-Glénisson,et al.  [Combined quantitative and qualitative methods to identify local facilitators of and barriers to physician's adherence to clinical practice guidelines]. , 2008, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[34]  D. Misch.  Andragogy and Medical Education: Are Medical Students Internally Motivated to Learn? , 2002, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[35]  M. Field,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines : directions for a new program , 1990 .

[36]  D. Turk,et al.  Treatment Adherence: Terminology, Incidence, and Conceptualization , 1987 .

[37]  B. Jaffe.  Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders , 1977 .