Fish recruitment in rivers with modified discharge depends on the interacting effects of flow and thermal regimes

Summary Alteration of flow and thermal regimes is a key consequence of human use of river and floodplain ecosystems, and these impacts result from a range of interacting ecological mechanisms. Environmental flow regimes are a management strategy to restore or maintain ecologically important aspects of river hydrology. However, inadequate understanding of the processes that determine the effects of flow on population dynamics of biota hinders the maximum benefits of environmental flows. Spawning and recruitment of riverine fish is mediated by temperature, access to nursery habitat and the timing and availability of resources. Differences in population sizes between regulated and unregulated rivers are often attributed to the effect of flow and thermal regime change on population dynamics. Dams and extraction of water have altered the flow and thermal regimes of rivers in the northern Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Combining three studies, we (i) examined differences in the recruitment of fish and patterns of potential prey availability between a regulated and unregulated river, (ii) studied the relationships between patterns of flow and temperature on spawning of fish in two rivers with contrasting regulated flow regimes and (iii) experimentally tested the effects of environmental flow releases in a regulated river on fish spawning and recruitment by comparing patterns over time against two unregulated rivers. Comparisons between regulated and unregulated rivers indicated that the significantly lower recruitment of Macquaria ambigua in the regulated river was linked with large differences in available prey. Species-specific differences in the abundance of fish larvae between two regulated rivers indicated that different reproductive strategies determine population-level responses to flow regulation. Finally, the experimental flow releases in a regulated reach during late spring did not result in a change in spawning and recruitment of fish, although influences of antecedent flow and temperature on larval and juvenile assemblage composition were significant. These findings indicate that the responses of fish spawning and recruitment to flow regime change and restoration are dependent on the conditions that determine the success of these critical life-history processes. Specifically, key effects of flow regulation are reduced summer water temperatures due to hypolimnetic discharge from dams, and the reduced frequency and duration of low flows. Reduced water temperatures limit opportunities for fish to spawn, and sustained base flows were associated with lower densities of potential prey sources in conjunction with potential flushing of larvae and juveniles, thereby influencing recruitment. The benefits of environmental flow programmes can be enhanced if flow regimes are modified to ensure that abiotic and biotic conditions that support persistence of biota are provided. In conjunction with flow pulses and floods, low flows are a natural and ecologically important component of flow regimes, particularly in dryland rivers. Understanding the interactive and mechanistic effects of flow and thermal regimes on population viability and patterns of biodiversity is critical to maximising the value of environmental flows.

[1]  P. Humphries,et al.  River regulation and fish larvae: variation through space and time , 2002 .

[2]  T. McMahon,et al.  Droughts and anti‐droughts: the low flow hydrology of Australian rivers , 2003 .

[3]  A. Arthington,et al.  Continuous recruitment underpins fish persistence in the arid rivers of far-western Queensland, Australia , 2011 .

[4]  Nick Marsh,et al.  Classification of natural flow regimes in Australia to support environmental flow management , 2010 .

[5]  B. Biggs,et al.  Linking scales of flow variability to lotic ecosystem structure and function , 2005 .

[6]  T. C. Bjornn,et al.  Influence of Flow and Temperature on Survival of Wild Subyearling Fall Chinook Salmon in the Snake River , 2003 .

[7]  A. Robertson,et al.  Early fish growth varies in response to components of the flow regime in a temperate floodplain river , 2011 .

[8]  I. Cowx,et al.  Is water temperature an adequate predictor of recruitment success in cyprinid fish populations in lowland rivers , 2003 .

[9]  T. Kennedy,et al.  Ecosystem ecology meets adaptive management: food web response to a controlled flood on the Colorado River, Glen Canyon. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[10]  O. Scholz,et al.  Golden perch Macquaria ambigua are flexible spawners in the Darling River, Australia , 2009 .

[11]  Robert J Rolls,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Patterns in Fish Assemblages Following an Artificially Extended Floodplain Inundation Event, Northern Murray-Darling Basin, Australia , 2010, Environmental management.

[12]  R. Kingsford,et al.  Small environmental flows, drought and the role of refugia for freshwater fish in the Macquarie Marshes, arid Australia , 2009 .

[13]  T. Kennedy,et al.  ABIOTIC & BIOTIC RESPONSES OF THE COLORADO RIVER TO CONTROLLED FLOODS AT GLEN CANYON DAM, ARIZONA, USA , 2012 .

[14]  R. Ryel,et al.  FLOW–SEDIMENT–BIOTA RELATIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR RIVER REGULATION EFFECTS ON NATIVE FISH ABUNDANCE , 2002 .

[15]  T. Hein,et al.  Zooplankton biomass and community structure in a Danube River floodplain system: effects of hydrology , 2002 .

[16]  D. Crook,et al.  Evaluation of a sweep net electrofishing method for the collection of small fish and shrimp in lotic freshwater environments , 2002, Hydrobiologia.

[17]  A. Bednarek,et al.  MODIFYING DAM OPERATIONS TO RESTORE RIVERS: ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO TENNESSEE RIVER DAM MITIGATION , 2005 .

[18]  P. Gehrke,et al.  River regulation and fish communities in the Murray-Darling River system, Australia , 1995 .

[19]  K. Gido,et al.  Flow regime affects availability of native and nonnative prey of an endangered predator , 2007 .

[20]  C. Max Finlayson,et al.  Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin: freshwater ecosystem conservation options in an era of climate change , 2011 .

[21]  J. Olden,et al.  Incorporating thermal regimes into environmental flows assessments: modifying dam operations to restore freshwater ecosystem integrity , 2010 .

[22]  Stuart E. Bunn,et al.  Variability of fish diets between dry and flood periods in an arid zone floodplain river , 2005 .

[23]  Alison J. King,et al.  Fish recruitment on floodplains: the roles of patterns of flooding and life history characteristics , 2003 .

[24]  John Douglas,et al.  Flow-related patterns in abundance and composition of the fish fauna of a degraded Australian lowland river , 2008 .

[25]  P. Humphries,et al.  Diet of Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peelii) (Mitchell) larvae in an Australian lowland river in low flow and high flow years , 2009, Hydrobiologia.

[26]  M. Power,et al.  Effects of Disturbance on River Food Webs , 1996, Science.

[27]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Stating mechanisms and refining criteria for ecologically successful river restoration: A comment on Palmer et al. (2005) , 2005 .

[28]  Brian Richter,et al.  Application of the Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration Software in Environmental Flow Setting 1 , 2007 .

[29]  A. D. Buijse,et al.  Fish recruitment in a large, temperate floodplain: the importance of annual flooding, temperature and habitat complexity , 2011 .

[30]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance in ecology , 2001 .

[31]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Flow variability in dryland rivers: boom, bust and the bits in between , 2006 .

[32]  I. Stuart,et al.  Factors influencing recruitment patterns of Golden Perch (Macquaria ambigua oriens) within a hydrologically variable and regulated Australian tropical river system , 2008 .

[33]  Angela H. Arthington,et al.  Preserving the biodiversity and ecological services of rivers: new challenges and research opportunities: Preserving the biodiversity and ecological services of rivers , 2010 .

[34]  R. Naiman,et al.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[35]  Alison J. King,et al.  Environmental flow enhances native fish spawning and recruitment in the Murray River, Australia , 2009 .

[36]  S. Lek,et al.  Annual dynamics of the abundance of fish larvae and its relationship with hydrological variation in the Pearl River , 2010, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[37]  C. Townsend,et al.  Multiple stressors in agricultural streams: interactions among sediment addition, nutrient enrichment and water abstraction , 2010 .

[38]  K. Winemiller,et al.  Relationships between hydrology, spatial heterogeneity, and fish recruitment dynamics in a temperate floodplain river , 2008 .

[39]  J. King,et al.  Linked effects of dam-released floods and water temperature on spawning of the Clanwilliam yellowfish Barbus capensis , 1998, Hydrobiologia.

[40]  P. S. Lake,et al.  Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[41]  F. Magilligan,et al.  Changes in hydrologic regime by dams , 2005 .

[42]  M. Palmer,et al.  DIVERSITY–PRODUCTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS IN STREAMS VARY AS A FUNCTION OF THE NATURAL DISTURBANCE REGIME , 2005 .

[43]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure , 1993 .

[44]  Keith B. Gido,et al.  Responses of Native and Nonnative Fishes to Natural Flow Regime Mimicry in the San Juan River , 2004 .

[45]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[46]  Hugh A. Jones,et al.  The effect of Keepit Dam on the temperature regime of the Namoi River, Australia , 2002 .

[47]  S. Platania,et al.  Flow regulation and fragmentation imperil pelagic-spawning riverine fishes. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[48]  P. Moyle,et al.  Restoring native fish assemblages to a regulated California stream using the natural flow regime concept. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[49]  E. Irwin,et al.  FLOW AND HABITAT EFFECTS ON JUVENILE FISH ABUNDANCE IN NATURAL AND ALTERED FLOW REGIMES , 2001 .

[50]  U. Uehlinger,et al.  Experimental floods cause ecosystem regime shift in a regulated river. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[51]  Arthur V. Brown,et al.  The Role of Disturbance in Stream Ecology , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[52]  T. F. Turner,et al.  Habitat and resource use by larval and juvenile fishes in an arid‐land river (Rio Grande, New Mexico) , 2006 .

[53]  N. Bond,et al.  Examining the ecological consequences of restoring flow intermittency to artificially perennial lowland streams: Patterns and predictions from the Broken—Boosey creek system in northern Victoria, Australia , 2010 .

[54]  C. Revenga,et al.  Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of the World's Large River Systems , 2005, Science.

[55]  Patrick Driver,et al.  Effects of flow regulation on carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) recruitment in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia , 2005 .

[56]  F. Schiemer,et al.  Zooplankton abundance in the River Danube, Austria: the significance of inshore retention , 1999 .

[57]  W. H. Burton,et al.  Enhancement of Fish Feeding and Growth after an Increase in Minimum Flow below the Conowingo Dam , 1993 .

[58]  P. Humphries,et al.  Fish, Flows and Flood Plains: Links between Freshwater Fishes and their Environment in the Murray-Darling River System, Australia , 1999, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[59]  John C. Schmidt,et al.  Large-Scale Flow Experiments for Managing River Systems , 2011 .

[60]  M. Bradford,et al.  Test of an environmental flow release in a British Columbia river: does more water mean more fish? , 2011 .

[61]  D. Scarnecchia,et al.  Larval fish catches in the lower Milk River, Montana in relation to timing and magnitude of spring discharge , 2008 .

[62]  K. Murchie,et al.  Fish response to modified flow regimes in regulated rivers: research methods, effects and opportunities , 2008 .

[63]  J. Thorp,et al.  Zooplankton assemblages in the Ohio River: seasonal, tributary, and navigation dam effects , 1994 .

[64]  A. Agostinho,et al.  Influence of the flood regime on the reproduction of fish species with different reproductive strategies in the Cuiabá River, Upper Pantanal, Brazil , 2008 .

[65]  E. Connor,et al.  Changes in the Distribution and Density of Pink, Chum, and Chinook Salmon Spawning in the Upper Skagit River in Response to Flow Management Measures , 2004 .