Dance experience sculpts aesthetic perception and related brain circuits

Previous research on aesthetic preferences demonstrates that people are more likely to judge a stimulus as pleasing if it is familiar. Although general familiarity and liking are related, it is less clear how motor familiarity, or embodiment, relates to a viewer's aesthetic appraisal. This study directly compared how learning to embody an action impacts the neural response when watching and aesthetically evaluating the same action. Twenty‐two participants trained for 4 days on dance sequences. Each day they physically rehearsed one set of sequences, passively watched a second set, listened to the music of a third set, and a fourth set remained untrained. Functional MRI was obtained prior to and immediately following the training period, as were affective and physical ability ratings for each dance sequence. This approach enabled precise comparison of self‐report methods of embodiment with nonbiased, empirical measures of action performance. Results suggest that after experience, participants most enjoy watching those dance sequences they danced or observed. Moreover, brain regions involved in mediating the aesthetic response shift from subcortical regions associated with dopaminergic reward processing to posterior temporal regions involved in processing multisensory integration, emotion, and biological motion.

[1]  M. Giese,et al.  Visual Learning Shapes the Processing of Complex Movement Stimuli in the Human Brain , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  A. Jacobs,et al.  When we like what we know – A parametric fMRI analysis of beauty and familiarity , 2013, Brain and Language.

[3]  Francesco Versace,et al.  Pleasure rather than salience activates human nucleus accumbens and medial prefrontal cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  The impact of sensorimotor experience on affective evaluation of dance , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  Swann Pichon,et al.  Threat prompts defensive brain responses independently of attentional control. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Neuroaesthetics and beyond: new horizons in applying the science of the brain to the art of dance , 2012 .

[7]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[10]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  S. Tipper,et al.  Self produced and observed actions influence emotion: the roles of action fluency and eye gaze , 2008, Psychological research.

[12]  S. Liew,et al.  Both novelty and expertise increase action observation network activity , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  Francesco Versace,et al.  Emotional imagery: Assessing pleasure and arousal in the brain's reward circuitry , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[14]  R. Passingham,et al.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[16]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[17]  P. Haggard,et al.  Experts see it all: configural effects in action observation , 2010, Psychological research.

[18]  Oshin Vartanian,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings , 2004, Neuroreport.

[19]  Marcos Nadal,et al.  Neuroaesthetics: themes from the past, current issues, and challenges for the future , 2012, Rendiconti Lincei.

[20]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  The Impact of Aesthetic Evaluation and Physical Ability on Dance Perception , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[21]  N. N. Rüther,et al.  Observed manipulation of novel tools leads to mu rhythm suppression over sensory-motor cortices , 2014, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  J. Armony,et al.  Self-relevance modulates brain responses to angry body expressions , 2013, Cortex.

[23]  S. Zeki,et al.  Neural correlates of beauty. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  J. Grèzes,et al.  A direct amygdala‐motor pathway for emotional displays to influence action: A diffusion tensor imaging study , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[25]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Pascal Belin,et al.  People-selectivity, audiovisual integration and heteromodality in the superior temporal sulcus , 2014, Cortex.

[28]  A. Goldman,et al.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  B. Montero,et al.  Practice makes perfect: the effect of dance training on the aesthetic judge , 2012 .

[30]  D. E. Glaser,et al.  Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[31]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  Expert athletes activate somatosensory and motor planning regions of the brain when passively listening to familiar sports sounds , 2014, Brain and Cognition.

[32]  Robert J Zatorre,et al.  The Role of Auditory and Premotor Cortex in Sensorimotor Transformations , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[33]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion , 2002, Neuron.

[34]  Alberto Fernández,et al.  Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  A. Schleicher,et al.  The human parietal operculum. I. Cytoarchitectonic mapping of subdivisions. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  S. Tipper From observation to action simulation: The role of attention, eye-gaze, emotion, and body state , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  Daniel J. Levitin,et al.  The rewards of music listening: Response and physiological connectivity of the mesolimbic system , 2005, NeuroImage.

[38]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.