Stakeholders, soft systems and technology: separation and mediation in the analysis of information system requirements

This paper describes the application of stakeholder analysis and soft systems thinking for an investigation of information system requirements. It is argued that it is appropriate to approach IS development as an exercise in managing complexity (soft systems) and pluralism (stakeholder analysis). A framework for investigating IS requirements is proposed that contrasts the current situation with the future situation and the real world with conceptual thinking about the real world. These aspects are viewed as outcomes of the process of IS requirements analysis, for which the metaphor of mediation is adopted in preference to presenting requirements analysis as a binary distinction between social construction and objectivity. The IS requirements analysis framework is applied in action research and the findings and learning that arose are presented.

[1]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Participatory Action Research and Action Science Compared , 1989 .

[2]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[3]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[4]  G. R. Gladden.  Stop the life-cycle, I want to get off , 1982, ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes.

[5]  R. H. Franke.  The Unbounded Mind: Breaking the Chains of Traditional Business Thinking , 1993 .

[6]  E. Shils.  The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[7]  David Simms,et al.  The Heart of Enterprise , 1980 .

[8]  Brian Wilson,et al.  Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications , 1990 .

[9]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Multiview - An Exploration in Information Systems Development , 1986, Aust. Comput. J..

[10]  B. Latour.  Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[11]  Harold A. Linstone,et al.  Multiple perspectives: Concept, applications, and user guidelines , 1989 .

[12]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Stakeholders, information system failures and soft systems methodology: an assessment , 1988 .

[13]  Harold A. Linstone,et al.  Multiple Perspectives: Overcoming the Weaknesses of MS/OR , 1985 .

[14]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[15]  A. Wicks,et al.  A Feminist Reinterpretation of The Stakeholder Concept , 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[16]  P. Checkland.  From framework through experience to learning: The essential nature of action research , 1991 .

[17]  G. Burrell,et al.  Modernism, Postmodernism and Organizational Analysis: An Introduction , 1988 .

[18]  R. Mason.  Challenging strategic planning assumptions , 1981 .

[19]  P J Lewis,et al.  Rich picture building in the soft systems methodology , 1992 .

[20]  David Jones,et al.  Corporate strategy , 1989, Nature.

[21]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems failures—a survey and classification of the empirical literature , 1988 .

[22]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[23]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Business process reengineering: the need for a methodology to re-vision the organization , 1994, Business Process Re-Engineering.

[24]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[25]  C. Churchman,et al.  The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organization , 1971 .

[26]  Peter Gyngell,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology , 1994 .

[27]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[28]  J. R. G. Wood,et al.  How we profess: the ethical systems analyst , 1996, CACM.

[29]  James L. Bossert,et al.  Quality Function Deployment , 2021, Quality Function Deployment.

[30]  David E. Avison,et al.  Identifying and incorporating change in information systems , 1994 .

[31]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1991 .

[32]  Ann Taket,et al.  Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. , 1991 .

[33]  H. Smalley.  The systems approach. , 1972, Hospitals.

[34]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[35]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[36]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Information Systems Development Research: An Exploration of Ideas in Practice , 1991, Comput. J..

[37]  S. Clegg.  Modern Organizations: Organization Studies in the Postmodern World , 1990 .

[38]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work , 1996, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology.