Rationality, Irrationality and Escalating Behavior in Lowest Unique Bid Auctions

Information technology has revolutionized the traditional structure of markets. The removal of geographical and time constraints has fostered the growth of online auction markets, which now include millions of economic agents worldwide and annual transaction volumes in the billions of dollars. Here, we analyze bid histories of a little studied type of online auctions – lowest unique bid auctions. Similarly to what has been reported for foraging animals searching for scarce food, we find that agents adopt Lévy flight search strategies in their exploration of “bid space”. The Lévy regime, which is characterized by a power-law decaying probability distribution of step lengths, holds over nearly three orders of magnitude. We develop a quantitative model for lowest unique bid online auctions that reveals that agents use nearly optimal bidding strategies. However, agents participating in these auctions do not optimize their financial gain. Indeed, as long as there are many auction participants, a rational profit optimizing agent would choose not to participate in these auction markets.

[1]  G. Viswanathan,et al.  Lévy flights and superdiffusion in the context of biological encounters and random searches , 2008 .

[2]  E. Maasland,et al.  Auction Theory , 2021, Springer Texts in Business and Economics.

[3]  David H. Reiley Auctions on the Internet: What's Being Auctioned, and How? , 2000 .

[4]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[5]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  A theory of auctions and competitive bidding , 1982 .

[6]  Georgios Zervas,et al.  Information asymmetries in pay-per-bid auctions , 2010, EC '10.

[7]  Sophie Bertrand,et al.  Lévy trajectories of Peruvian purse-seiners as an indicator of the spatial distribution of anchovy ( Engraulis ringens ) , 2005 .

[8]  R. Mantegna,et al.  Scaling behaviour in the dynamics of an economic index , 1995, Nature.

[9]  H. Larralde,et al.  Lévy walk patterns in the foraging movements of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[10]  P. Bag Optimal auction design and R&D , 1997 .

[11]  Martin Grieger Electronic marketplaces: A literature review and a call for supply chain management research , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Consumer and Producer Behavior in the Market for Penny Auctions : A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis , 2009 .

[13]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[14]  Sonal Mittal Equilibrium Analysis of Generalized Penny Auctions , 2010 .

[15]  F. Bartumeus,et al.  Helical Lévy walks: Adjusting searching statistics to resource availability in microzooplankton , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  H. Stanley,et al.  Optimizing the success of random searches , 1999, Nature.

[17]  T. Başar,et al.  Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory , 1982 .

[18]  M. Shubik The Dollar Auction game: a paradox in noncooperative behavior and escalation , 1971 .

[19]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[20]  Eric van Heck,et al.  How should CIOs deal with Web-based auctions? , 1998, CACM.

[21]  Gandhimohan M. Viswanathan,et al.  Ecology: Fish in Lévy-flight foraging , 2010, Nature.

[22]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. , 1976 .

[23]  P. A. Prince,et al.  Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses , 1996, Nature.

[24]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Pennies from Ebay: The Determinants of Price in Online Auctions , 2000 .

[25]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour , 2008, Nature.

[26]  Georgios Zervas,et al.  Information asymmetries in pay-per-bid auctions , 2010, EC '10.

[27]  R. McAfee,et al.  Auctions with entry , 1987 .

[28]  C. Plott,et al.  Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon , 1979 .

[29]  Michael F. Shlesinger,et al.  Strange kinetics , 1993, Nature.

[30]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Environmental context explains Lévy and Brownian movement patterns of marine predators , 2010, Nature.

[31]  S. Havlin,et al.  Territory covered by N Lévy flights on d-dimensional lattices , 1997 .

[32]  Anatol Rapoport,et al.  N-person game theory;: Concepts and applications , 1970 .

[33]  T. Geisel,et al.  The scaling laws of human travel , 2006, Nature.

[34]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Understanding Behavior in Escalation Situations , 1989, Science.

[35]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Causes of Preference Reversal , 1990 .

[36]  E W Montroll,et al.  Random walks with self-similar clusters. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[38]  J. Nash Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. , 1950, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  The emerging role of electronic marketplaces on the Internet , 1998, CACM.