Trust and accountability in times of pandemics

The COVID-19 pandemic took place against the backdrop of growing political polarization and distrust in political institutions in many countries. Did deficiencies in government performance further erode trust in public institutions? Did citizens’ ideology interfere with the way they processed information on government performance? To investigate these two questions, we conducted a pre-registered online experiment in Spain in November 2020. Respondents in the treatment group were provided information on the number of contact tracers in their region, a key policy variable under the control of regional governments. We find that individuals greatly over-estimate the number of contact tracers in their region. When we provide the actual number of contact tracers, we find a decline in trust in governments, a reduction in willingness to fund public institutions and a decrease in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. We also find that individuals endogenously change their attribution of responsibilities when receiving the treatment. In regions where the regional and central governments are controlled by different parties, sympathizers of the regional incumbent react to the negative news on performance by attributing greater responsibility for it to the central government. We call this the blame shifting effect. In those regions, the negative information does not translate into lower voting intentions for the regional incumbent government. These results suggest that the exercise of political accountability may be particularly difficult in settings with high political polarization and areas of responsibility that are not clearly delineated.

[1]  Timothy Besley,et al.  Pandemic responsiveness: Evidence from social distancing and lockdown policy during COVID-19 , 2022, PloS one.

[2]  Jesse M. Shapiro,et al.  Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization , 2020, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[3]  Horacio Larreguy,et al.  Priors Rule: When Do Malfeasance Revelations Help or Hurt Incumbent Parties? , 2018, Journal of the European Economic Association.

[4]  Leonardo Bursztyn,et al.  Scapegoating During Crises , 2022 .

[5]  Carlos Sanz,et al.  Inequality and psychological well-being in times of COVID-19: evidence from Spain , 2021, SERIEs.

[6]  D. Stegmueller,et al.  COVID-19, Government Performance, and Democracy: Survey Experimental Evidence from 12 Countries , 2021 .

[7]  S. Stantcheva,et al.  Trust in scientists in times of pandemic: Panel evidence from 12 countries , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Thomas Graeber,et al.  Measuring the scientific effectiveness of contact tracing: Evidence from a natural experiment , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  D. Abrams,et al.  Changes in political trust in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: integrated public opinion evidence and implications , 2021, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.

[10]  Ruben Durante,et al.  Asocial capital: Civic culture and social distancing during COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of Public Economics.

[11]  G. Tabellini,et al.  Identity, Beliefs, and Political Conflict , 2018, The Quarterly Journal of Economics.

[12]  Noam Gidron,et al.  American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective , 2020 .

[13]  A. Khan,et al.  Building Trust in the State with Information: Evidence from Urban Punjab , 2020, Policy Research Working Papers.

[14]  S. Stantcheva,et al.  Civil Liberties in Times of Crisis , 2020, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.

[15]  James A. Robinson,et al.  Trust in State and Nonstate Actors: Evidence from Dispute Resolution in Pakistan , 2020, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Christopher Roth Designing Information Provision Experiments , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  Barry Eichengreen,et al.  The Political Scar of Epidemics , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[18]  O. Bargain,et al.  Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of Public Economics.

[19]  Dani Goldstein,et al.  Who Do You Trust? The Consequences of Partisanship and Trust in Government for Public Responsiveness to COVID-19 , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  Judit Vall Castelló,et al.  Living at the Peak: Health and Public Finance During the Covid-19 Pandemic , 2020 .

[21]  M. Gentzkow,et al.  Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic , 2020, Journal of Public Economics.

[22]  E. Papaioannou,et al.  The Political Economy of Populism , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[23]  Amuitz Garmendia Madariaga,et al.  Passing the buck? Responsibility attribution and cognitive bias in multilevel democracies , 2018, Democratic Representation in Multi-level Systems.

[24]  Taylor C. Boas,et al.  Voter information campaigns and political accountability: Cumulative findings from a preregistered meta-analysis of coordinated trials , 2019, Science Advances.

[25]  Lluís Orriols,et al.  Attributing responsibility in devolved contexts. Experimental evidence from the UK , 2019, Electoral Studies.

[26]  Brian F. Schaffner,et al.  Taking the Study of Political Behavior Online , 2018 .

[27]  Sandra León Muddling Up Political Systems? When Regionalization Blurs Democracy: Decentralization and Attribution of Responsibility , 2018 .

[28]  Guillem Rico,et al.  Pass the Buck If You Can: How Partisan Competition Triggers Attribution Bias in Multilevel Democracies , 2018 .

[29]  J. Haushofer,et al.  Measuring and Bounding Experimenter Demand , 2017, American Economic Review.

[30]  Martin Bisgaard Bias Will Find a Way: Economic Perceptions, Attributions of Blame, and Partisan-Motivated Reasoning during Crisis , 2015, The Journal of Politics.

[31]  T. Nannicini,et al.  How Do Voters Respond to Information? Evidence from a Randomized Campaign , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[32]  Michael I. Norton,et al.  How Elastic are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments , 2013 .

[33]  S. Mullainathan,et al.  Sticking with Your Vote: Cognitive Dissonance and Political Attitudes , 2009 .

[34]  Cameron D. Anderson Economic Voting and Multilevel Governance: A Comparative Individual‐Level Analysis , 2006 .

[35]  Frederico Finan,et al.  Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effects of Brazil's Publicly Released Audits on Electoral Outcomes , 2005 .

[36]  A. Shleifer,et al.  The Market for News , 2003 .

[37]  T. Besley,et al.  The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India , 2000 .

[38]  Guy D. Whitten,et al.  A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context , 1993 .