Using Card Sort Epistemic Network Analysis to Explore Preservice Teachers’ Ideas About the Nature of Engineering
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Carlone,et al. The Production of Epistemic Culture and Agency during a First-Grade Engineering Design Unit in an Urban Emergent School , 2021, Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER).
[2] Erin E. Peters-Burton,et al. Making Connections , 2021, Science & Education.
[3] Jessica Watkins,et al. Shifts in elementary teachers' pedagogical reasoning: Studying teacher learning in an online graduate program in engineering education , 2020, Journal of Engineering Education.
[4] Matthew J. Koehler,et al. Idle chatter or compelling conversation? The potential of the social media‐based # NGSSchat network for supporting science education reform efforts , 2020 .
[5] S. Erduran,et al. The Nature of STEM Disciplines in the Science Education Standards Documents from the USA, Korea and Taiwan , 2020, Science & Education.
[6] W. McComas,et al. A Critique of “STEM” Education , 2020, Science & Education.
[7] J. Pleasants,et al. Inquiring into the Nature of STEM Problems , 2020, Science & Education.
[8] Gordon D. Hoople,et al. Exploring Faculty and Student Frameworks for Engineering Knowledge Using an Online Card Sorting Platform , 2020, Int. J. Eng. Pedagog..
[9] M. Trabia,et al. The influence of an engineering design experience on elementary teachers’ nature of engineering views , 2020, International Journal of Technology and Design Education.
[10] Jennifer C. Parrish,et al. Extending the Utility of the Views of Nature of Science Assessment through Epistemic Network Analysis , 2019, Science & Education.
[11] Ayşegül Ergün,et al. The effect of design based science education applications of science teacher candidates on their perceptions of engineering education and engineer , 2019, Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi.
[12] Christine M. Cunningham,et al. Epistemic tools in engineering design for K‐12 education , 2019, Science Education.
[13] Grant E. Gardner,et al. Comparing Individual and Group-Negotiated Knowledge Structures in an Introductory Biology Course for Majors , 2019 .
[14] Jacob Pleasants,et al. Refining an Instrument and Studying Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of the Scope of Engineering , 2019, Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER).
[15] Zhiqiang Cai,et al. Exploring primary school teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in online collaborative discourse: An epistemic network analysis , 2019, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[16] J. Olson,et al. What is engineering? Elaborating the nature of engineering for K‐12 education , 2018, Science Education.
[17] Brooke A. Whitworth,et al. Is It Engineering or Not , 2017 .
[18] Kristen B. Wendell,et al. Reflective Decision‐Making in Elementary Students' Engineering Design , 2017 .
[19] Kimberly D. Tanner,et al. Using the Biology Card Sorting Task to Measure Changes in Conceptual Expertise during Postsecondary Biology Education , 2017, CBE life sciences education.
[20] David Williamson Shaffer,et al. A Tutorial on Epistemic Network Analysis: Analyzing the Structure of Connections in Cognitive, Social, and Interaction Data , 2016, J. Learn. Anal..
[21] Allison Antink-Meyer,et al. Science Teachers’ Misconceptions in Science and Engineering Distinctions: Reflections on Modern Research Examples , 2016 .
[22] Catherine Elizabeth Kendig,et al. What is Proof of Concept Research and how does it Generate Epistemic and Ethical Categories for Future Scientific Practice? , 2016, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[23] W. McComas,et al. The Nature of Science and the Next Generation Science Standards: Analysis and Critique , 2016 .
[24] K. Tanner,et al. Thinking Like a Chemist: Development of a Chemistry Card-Sorting Task To Probe Conceptual Expertise , 2016 .
[25] Steven M. Goodreau,et al. Understanding Classrooms through Social Network Analysis: A Primer for Social Network Analysis in Education Research , 2014, CBE life sciences education.
[26] Aran W. Glancy,et al. A Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education: Research and Development , 2014 .
[27] E. Burton. Student work products as a teaching tool for nature of science pedagogical knowledge: A professional development project with in-service secondary science teachers , 2013 .
[28] M. Gooda. Changing the conversation , 2012 .
[29] Peter Kroes,et al. Technical Artefacts: Creations of Mind and Matter , 2012 .
[30] G.M. Bodner,et al. First-year engineering students' views of the nature of engineering: implications for engineering programmes , 2016 .
[31] Elizabeth Bagley,et al. Epistemic network analysis : a Prototype for 21 st Century assessment of Learning , 2009 .
[32] Suvi Tala,et al. Unified View of Science and Technology for Education: Technoscience and Technoscience Education , 2009 .
[33] Daniel J. Brass,et al. Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.
[34] Helvi Kyngäs,et al. The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.
[35] Martin G. Everett,et al. A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality , 2006, Soc. Networks.
[36] Christine M. Cunningham,et al. Elementary Teachers' Understandings of Engineering and Technology , 2006 .
[37] Gordon Rugg,et al. That site looks 88.46% familiar: quantifying similarity of Web page design , 2005, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..
[38] Stephen P. Borgatti,et al. Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.
[39] D. Allen,et al. Approaches to cell biology teaching: mapping the journey-concept maps as signposts of developing knowledge structures. , 2003, Cell biology education.
[40] Carl Mitcham,et al. Thinking through Technology , 1994 .
[41] A. Kimball Romney,et al. Systematic Data Collection , 1988 .
[42] M. Ferguson-Hessler,et al. Cognitive structures of good and poor novice problem solvers in physics , 1986 .
[43] Paul J. Feltovich,et al. Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..
[44] Dorothea P. Simon,et al. Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems , 1980, Science.