Establishing the reliability and developmental validity of a neurobehavioral assessment for preterm infants: a methodological process.

The Neurobehavioral Assessment of the Preterm Infant was developed in 3 phases: a pilot study, an exploratory study, and a validation study. In the exploratory study, clusters characterized by conceptual cohesion and face validity were systematically subjected to statistical analyses to determine whether they also had high test-retest reliability and developmental validity. In the validation study, a shortened version of the test was used with an independent cohort of 290 preterm infants. A step-by-step methodological process was used to test whether the results from the exploratory study would generalize over cohorts, different versions of the test, different hospitals, and changes in examiners. This process yielded 7 highly stable, developmentally valid, and representative preterm neurobehavioral functions that generalized over the exploratory and the validation studies. These were: motor development and vigor, scarf sign, popliteal angle, alertness and orientation, percent asleep ratings, irritability, and vigor of crying.

[1]  D. Stevenson,et al.  Stable individual differences in developmentally changing preterm infants: a replicated study. , 1989, Child development.

[2]  H. Kraemer,et al.  A methodological approach to developing an assessment procedure for testing the neurobehavioral maturity of preterm infants. , 1987, Child development.

[3]  A. Korner,et al.  Effects of vestibular-proprioceptive stimulation on the neurobehavioral development of preterm infants: a pilot study. , 1983, Neuropediatrics.

[4]  J. Ballard,et al.  A simplified score for assessment of fetal maturation of newly born infants. , 1979, The Journal of pediatrics.

[5]  A. Korner,et al.  Individual differences at birth: implications for early experience and later development. , 1971, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[6]  E. Thoman,et al.  Visual alertness in neonates as evoked by maternal care. , 1970, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  C. Amiel‐Tison Neurological evaluation of the maturity of newborn infants. , 1968, Archives of disease in childhood.

[8]  A. Korner,et al.  VISUAL ALERTNESS AS RELATED TO SOOTHING IN NEONATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR MATERNAL STIMULATION AND EARLY DEPRIVATION. , 1966 .

[9]  H. Prechtl,et al.  The Neurological Examination of the Full-term Newborn Infant. A Manual for Clinical Use from the Department of Experimental Neurology University of Groningen , 1964 .

[10]  J. Rosenblith The modified Graham behavior test for neonates: test-retest reliability, normative data, and hypotheses for future work. , 1961, Biologia neonatorum. Neo-natal studies.

[11]  J. DiPietro,et al.  Examiner effects in the administration of the NBAS: The illusion of reliability , 1989 .

[12]  D. Stevenson,et al.  State behavior of preterm infants as a function of development, individual and sex differences , 1988 .

[13]  I. Brandt Patterns of Early Neurological Development , 1986 .

[14]  H. Kraemer,et al.  A model for assessing the development of preterm infants as a function of gestational, conceptional, or chronological age. , 1985 .

[15]  R. Emde,et al.  Organization and stability of newborn behavior : a commentary on the Brazelton Neonatal Behavior Assessment Scale , 1978 .

[16]  H. Moss Sex, Age, and State as Determinants of Mother-Infant Interaction* , 1967 .

[17]  F. Graham,et al.  Behavioral differences between normal and traumatized newborns: II: Standardization, reliability, and validity. , 1956 .