The Nature and Scope of Contestability Theory

Contes tability theory suggests that threat of entry may prevent monopolistic pricing e ven in a concentrated market because, if exit from the market is easy, monopolis tic pricing would induce hit and run entry. This paper shows that, despite easy exit, hit and run entry is unprofitable if incumbents' price responses are suffi ciently rapid. Only market data (not experimental) can reveal whetherresponses are sufficiently rapid; available evidence indicates they are. Another version o f contestability theory stresses threat of entry through long-term contracts. Th is threat, too, is shown to be unlikely to check monopolistic pricing. Copyright 1986 by Royal Economic Society.

[1]  Vernon L. Smith,et al.  Market Contestability in the Presence of Sunk (Entry) Costs , 1984 .

[2]  Marius Schwartz,et al.  Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure: Comment , 1983 .

[3]  J. Bain Barriers to new competition , 1957 .

[4]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  LIMIT PRICING AND ENTRY UNDER INCOMPLETE INFORMATION: AN EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS' , 1982 .

[5]  M. Spence,et al.  Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure: A Review Article , 1983 .

[6]  Leonard J. Mirman,et al.  Equilibrium Limit Pricing: The Effects of Private Information and Stochastic Demand , 1983 .

[7]  J. Wenders Excess Capacity as a Barrier to Entry , 1971 .

[8]  Vernon L. Smith,et al.  Natural Monopoly and Contested Markets: Some Experimental Results , 1984, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[9]  W. Baumol,et al.  Deregulation and the Theory of Contestable Markets , 1984 .

[10]  T. Keeler,et al.  AIRLINE DEREGULATION, FARES, AND MARKET BEHAVIOR: SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE , 1985 .

[11]  W. Baumol Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure , 1982 .

[12]  William J. Baumol,et al.  Microtheory: Applications and Origins , 1986 .

[13]  John C. Panzar,et al.  On the Theory of Perfectly-Contestable Markets , 1986 .

[14]  D. Newbery,et al.  Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .

[15]  D. Needham Economic Analysis and Industrial Structure , 1970 .

[16]  R. Schmalensee Entry Deterrence in the Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry , 1978 .

[17]  S. Salop Strategic Entry Deterrence , 1979 .

[18]  R. Shaw,et al.  Patent Expiry and Competition in Polyester Fibres , 1977 .

[19]  F. Modigliani,et al.  New Developments on the Oligopoly Front , 1958, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  A. Dixit The Role Of Investment In Entry-Deterrence , 1980 .

[21]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Monopoly Behavior, Decentralized Regulation, and Contestable Markets: An Experimental Evaluation , 1985 .

[22]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Why Regulate Utilities , 1968 .

[23]  A. Spence Entry, Capacity, Investment and Oligopolistic Pricing , 1977 .

[24]  W. Baumol,et al.  Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure , 1982 .

[25]  H. Demsetz Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy , 1973, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[26]  Clifford Winston,et al.  Empirical Implications and Tests of the Contestability Hypothesis , 1987, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[27]  A. Dixit Recent Developments in Oligopoly Theory , 1982 .

[28]  D. Osborne On the Rationality of Limit Pricing , 1973 .