Neurophysiological Correlates of the Reflexive Orienting of Spatial Attention

There are two reflexive biases in orienting attention that assist in the exploration of the visual scene. A distinct object will draw, or capture, spatial attention to its locus. After this object has been inspected (and deemed irrelevant), inhibition of return prevents its repeated inspection. Here, we describe the neuro-physiological correlates of these biases in orienting attention. In the superior colliculus, both originate from changes in sensory processing—the capture of attention is linked to a strong neural representation of a visual target, whereas inhibition of return is associated with a weak representation of this target. We describe how changes in this sensory signal may produce changes in behavior and can explain the typical and anomalous findings associated with these biases in reflexively orienting attention.

[1]  D. Robinson,et al.  Covert orienting of attention in macaques. II. Contributions of parietal cortex. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  A. Sereno,et al.  Inhibition of return in manual and saccadic response systems , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Neuronal Activity in the Lateral Intraparietal Area and Spatial Attention , 2003, Science.

[4]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Corticocortical connections of anatomically and physiologically defined subdivisions within the inferior parietal lobule , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[6]  M. A. Steinmetz,et al.  Neuronal responses in area 7a to multiple stimulus displays: II. responses are suppressed at the cued location. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  J. Pratt,et al.  Oculocentric coding of inhibited eye movements to recently attended locations. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[9]  M. Gazzaniga The new cognitive neurosciences, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[10]  D. Munoz,et al.  On your mark, get set: Brainstem circuitry underlying saccadic initiation , 2000 .

[11]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[12]  M. Posner,et al.  Inhibition of return : Neural basis and function , 1985 .

[13]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Using auditory and visual stimuli to investigate the behavioral and neuronal consequences of reflexive covert orienting. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  M. Posner Attention in cognitive neuroscience: An overview. , 1995 .

[15]  D. Munoz,et al.  Saccadic Probability Influences Motor Preparation Signals and Time to Saccadic Initiation , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Steven Yantis,et al.  To See Is to Attend , 2003, Science.

[17]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Neural correlates of the automatic and goal-driven biases in orienting spatial attention. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Correlates of Capture of Attention and Inhibition of Return across Stages of Visual Processing , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  T. L. Hickey,et al.  The distribution of retino‐collicular axon terminals in rhesus monkey , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Temporal dissociation of motor responses and subjective awareness. A study in normal subjects. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Space and attention in parietal cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[22]  M. Goldberg,et al.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[23]  M A Meredith,et al.  The influence of stimulus properties on multisensory processing in the awake primate superior colliculus. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[24]  R. Klein,et al.  Contribution of the Primate Superior Colliculus to Inhibition of Return , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Age Differences in the Control of Looking Behavior: Do You Know Where Your Eyes Have Been? , 2000, Psychological science.

[26]  M. Wallace,et al.  Representation and integration of multiple sensory inputs in primate superior colliculus. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  F. Lui,et al.  Projections from visual areas of the cerebral cortex to pretectal nuclear complex, terminal accessory optic nuclei, and superior colliculus in macaque monkey , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  Michele A. Basso,et al.  Modulation of neuronal activity by target uncertainty , 1997, Nature.

[29]  David L. Sparks,et al.  Movement selection in advance of action in the superior colliculus , 1992, Nature.

[30]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Vying for dominance: dynamic interactions control visual fixation and saccadic initiation in the superior colliculus. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[31]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[32]  C. Connor,et al.  Covert attention suppresses neuronal responses in area 7a of the posterior parietal cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.