The content feedback practices of Applied Linguistics doctoral supervisors in New Zealand and Australian universities

The focus of this article is on the written feedback that supervisors say they often give their second language (L2) doctoral students. Little is known about the focus of this feedback and about what supervisors consider as priorities in the early draft writing of dissertation chapters. Given the potentially different priorities and foci of supervisors in different disciplines and different contexts (Bitchener, Basturkmen, & East, 2010), this article reports the findings of an investigation into the content focus of the written feedback that 30 Applied Linguistics supervisors in New Zealand and Australian universities said they provide on early drafts of dissertation chapters. All supervisors completed a questionnaire and 26 were interviewed. Two broad areas of concern are identified: subject knowledge, coverage and argument; and aspects of the writing that need to be edited in some way. The article closes with recommendations for further research and suggestions for pedagogical application.

[1]  J. Bitchener.  Creating an effective argument in different academic genres , 2017 .

[2]  Diane Pecorari,et al.  Plagiarism in second-language writing , 2014, Language Teaching.

[3]  J. Bitchener,et al.  Supervisors' on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: socialising students into the academic discourse community , 2014 .

[4]  Ling Shi,et al.  Perceptions and beliefs about textual appropriation and source use in second language writing , 2012 .

[5]  J. Bitchener,et al.  What constitutes effective feedback to postgraduate research students? The students’ perspective , 2012, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice.

[6]  J. Bitchener,et al.  The Focus of Supervisor Written Feedback to Thesis/Dissertation Students , 2010 .

[7]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[8]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  An analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis , 2007 .

[9]  K. Hyland,et al.  Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal , 2004 .

[10]  Yu Ren Dong,et al.  Non-native Graduate Students' Thesis/Dissertation Writing in Science: Self-reports by Students and Their Advisors from Two U.S. Institutions , 1998 .

[11]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[12]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[13]  T. Peseta.  Special Edition: Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice Editorial 9.3 , 2012, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice.

[14]  John Bitchener,et al.  Writing an Applied Linguistics Thesis or Dissertation , 2010 .

[15]  John M. Swales,et al.  Learning the literacy practices of graduate school : insiders' reflections on academic enculturation , 2008 .

[16]  John Bitchener,et al.  Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section , 2006 .

[17]  Desmond Allison,et al.  Dissertation Writing in Action: The Development of a Dissertation Writing Support Program for ESL Graduate Research Students. , 1998 .

[18]  K. Cadman.  Thesis writing for international students: A question of identity? , 1997 .

[19]  Philip Hubbard,et al.  The Writing Assignments and Writing Problems of Doctoral Students: Faculty Perceptions, Pedagogical Issues, and Needed Research. , 1992 .