Phylogenetic diversity and endemism of Australian daisies (Asteraceae)

AIM: To explore the performance of phylogenetic diversity metrics and of the novel categorical analysis of neo‐ and palaeo‐endemism (CANAPE) using a dataset of Australian native Asteraceae and in particular to compare the results at two taxonomic ranks: genus and species. LOCATION: Australia. METHODS: We used specimen data from Australia's Virtual Herbarium to produce species and genus distribution models with Maxent, and reconstructed a genus‐level phylogeny. Spatial analyses were conducted at a 100 km × 100 km scale. Randomization tests were employed to identify cells with significantly high or low values of phylogenetic diversity (PD), and CANAPE was used to identify significant hotspots of neo‐ and palaeo‐endemism. RESULTS: Significantly high PD values were found scattered along the northern and north‐eastern coast, whereas significantly low PD values characterized the arid interior. CANAPE signalled hotspots of neo‐endemism in the mountainous south‐east of Australia and hotspots of palaeo‐endemism in the tropical north. Patterns were similar between genus‐ and species‐level analyses, although the latter inferred more cells with significant values. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: PD and CANAPE generally provided results for Australian Asteraceae consistent with expectations based on previous studies. This is further evidence for their utility in formulating and testing hypotheses about phylogenetic and biogeographical processes. The strength of the results is, however, partly dependent on the taxonomic scale of the analysis, a fact that has to be taken into account in the design and interpretation of future studies.

[1]  M. Ebach.  A history of biogeographical regionalisation in Australia , 2012 .

[2]  S. Laffan,et al.  Spatial distribution of species richness and endemism of the genus Acacia in Australia , 2011 .

[3]  Chris Moran,et al.  ASRIS: the database , 2003 .

[4]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  Integrating Phylogenetic Diversity, Complementarity, and Endemism for Conservation Assessment , 2004 .

[5]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Incorporating Geographical and Evolutionary Rarity into Conservation Prioritization , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[6]  James Mallet,et al.  Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroecology and conservation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  B. Mishler,et al.  Phylogenetic measures of biodiversity and neo- and paleo-endemism in Australian Acacia , 2014, Nature Communications.

[8]  Richard Grenyer,et al.  Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots , 2007, Nature.

[9]  D. Faith.  Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity , 1992 .

[10]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  Environmental predictors of global parrot (Aves : Psittaciformes) species richness and phylogenetic diversity , 2007 .

[11]  Todd J. Landers,et al.  Relationships between taxonomic resolution and spatial scales of multivariate variation , 2005 .

[12]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA , 1991, Plant Molecular Biology.

[13]  Michael J. Donoghue,et al.  A phylogenetic perspective on the distribution of plant diversity , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  J. Calabrese,et al.  Stacking species distribution models and adjusting bias by linking them to macroecological models , 2014 .

[15]  Mark A. Miller,et al.  Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees , 2010, 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE).

[16]  Shawn W. Laffan,et al.  Biodiverse, a tool for the spatial analysis of biological and related diversity , 2010 .

[17]  Leandro da Silva Duarte,et al.  Phylogenetic habitat filtering influences forest nucleation in grasslands , 2011 .

[18]  K. Katoh,et al.  MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability , 2013, Molecular biology and evolution.

[19]  J. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The Palaeogeographic significance of local endemism in Tasmanian higher plants , 1984 .

[20]  D. Greber,et al.  Phylogeny of Australian Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae) Based on Chloroplast and Nuclear Sequences, the trnL Intron, trnL/trnF Intergenic Spacer, matK, and ETS , 2009 .

[21]  W. Cornwell,et al.  Australian Tropical and Subtropical Rain Forest Community Assembly: Phylogeny, Functional Biogeography, and Environmental Gradients , 2012 .

[22]  Shawn W. Laffan,et al.  The effect of species geographical distribution estimation methods on richness and phylogenetic diversity estimates , 2012, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[23]  M. Westoby,et al.  Phylogenetic tests of community assembly across regional to continental scales in tropical and subtropical rain forests , 2011 .

[24]  Shawn W. Laffan,et al.  Endemism in the Australian flora , 2001 .

[25]  D. Soltis,et al.  MatK DNA Sequences and Phylogenetic Reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s. str , 1994 .

[26]  Daniel P Faith,et al.  Threatened Species and the Potential Loss of Phylogenetic Diversity: Conservation Scenarios Based on Estimated Extinction Probabilities and Phylogenetic Risk Analysis , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[27]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists , 2011 .

[28]  G. Hardin.  The competitive exclusion principle. , 1960, Science.

[29]  D. Richardson,et al.  Conservation biogeography – foundations, concepts and challenges , 2010 .

[30]  Shawn W. Laffan,et al.  Assessing endemism at multiple spatial scales, with an example from the Australian vascular flora , 2003 .

[31]  C. E. González‐Orozco,et al.  Distorted perception of the spatial distribution of plant diversity through uneven collecting efforts: the example of Asteraceae in Australia , 2012 .

[32]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Rarest of the rare: advances in combining evolutionary distinctiveness and scarcity to inform conservation at biogeographical scales , 2010 .

[33]  A. Schmidt‐Lebuhn,et al.  Fallacies and false premises—a critical assessment of the arguments for the recognition of paraphyletic taxa in botany , 2012, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[34]  D. Rosauer,et al.  Phylogenetic endemism: a new approach for identifying geographical concentrations of evolutionary history , 2009, Molecular ecology.

[35]  A. Schmidt‐Lebuhn,et al.  Phylogenetic relationships of the Australasian shrubby everlastings Ozothamnus and Cassinia (Asteraceae: Asteroideae: Gnaphalieae) , 2013, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[36]  J. Fjeldså.  The relevance of systematics in choosing priority areas for global conservation , 2000, Environmental Conservation.