New composite sustainability indices for the assessment of a chemical process in the conceptual design stage: case study on hydrogenation plant

Sustainability indices are increasingly recognized as a powerful tool for assessing the performance of chemical process designs considering energy, environment, safety and technological improvement aspects and above all, economy. Sustainability indicators enable decision makers to simplify, quantify and analyze complex information. Generally, it is challenging to evaluate the performance of process designs on the basis of a large number of indicators. The integration of a set of key sustainability indicators in the form of a composite index is essential for simplifying the evaluation of sustainability performance. Currently available methodologies for sustainability assessment of process designs require detailed process data, which are typically unavailable at the conceptual design phase. This paper introduces a new composite sustainability index (CSI) that addresses the sustainability performance of chemical processes and which can be applied for early design phases where minimum amount of data are available. The three pillars of sustainability are considered in the development of the new composite index, which are energy, environmental and safety aspects. A conceptual decision model based on the analytical hierarchy process can be employed to compare and determine weights for the different sustainability indicators, which are then aggregated to obtain the CSI, when the indicators conflict. The capability of the proposed model is investigated by applying it to a hydrogenation case study to choose the more sustainable design among different alternatives.

[1]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[2]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Comparison of methods for assessing environmental, health and safety (EHS) hazards in early phases of chemical process design , 2008 .

[3]  Laureano Jiménez,et al.  New Environmentally-Conscious Design Approach and Evaluation Tool for Chemical Processes , 2011 .

[4]  Daniel A. Crowl,et al.  Inherently safer chemical processes : a life cycle approach , 1997 .

[5]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Risk-based process plant design considering inherent safety , 2014 .

[6]  Subhas K. Sikdar,et al.  Pollution Balance Method and the Demonstration of Its Application to Minimizing Waste in a Biochemical Process , 1995 .

[7]  Faisal Khan,et al.  IECP — an approach for integrated environmental and cost evaluation of process design alternatives and its application to evaluate different NOx prevention technologies in a 125 MW thermal power plant , 2011 .

[8]  Paul T. Anastas,et al.  Frontiers in Green Chemistry: meeting the grand challenges for sustainability in R&D and manufacturing , 2008 .

[9]  Chunshan Li,et al.  Environmentally conscious design of chemical processes and products: Multi-optimization method , 2009 .

[10]  David R. Shonnard,et al.  Design Guidance for Chemical Processes Using Environmental and Economic Assessments , 2002 .

[11]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Life cycle iNdeX (LInX): a new indexing procedure for process and product design and decision-making , 2004 .

[12]  Anna L. Carew,et al.  Teaching sustainability as a contested concept: capitalizing on variation in engineering educators' conceptions of environmental, social and economic sustainability , 2008 .

[13]  Naveed Ramzan,et al.  Evaluating and improving environmental performance of HC's recovery system: A case study of distillation unit , 2008 .

[14]  Richard Turton,et al.  Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes , 2002 .

[15]  Heriberto Cabezas,et al.  Designing sustainable processes with simulation: the waste reduction (WAR) algorithm , 1999 .

[16]  Hui Chen,et al.  Systematic Framework for Environmentally Conscious Chemical Process Design: Early and Detailed Design Stages , 2004 .

[17]  Mohammad Hossein Ordouei,et al.  Development and Integration of Simple and Quantitative Safety, Pollution and Energy Indices into the Design and Retrofit of Process Plants , 2014 .

[18]  J. I. van Til,et al.  Articulation of sustainability in the emerging field of nanocoatings , 2008 .

[19]  Mohammad Hossein Ordouei,et al.  New sustainability indices for product design employing environmental impact and risk reduction: case study on gasoline blends , 2015 .

[20]  Dennis C. Hendershot,et al.  Inherently Safer Design: An Overview of Key Elements , 2011 .

[21]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  How do different process options and evaluation settings affect economic and environmental assessments? A case study on methyl methacrylate (MMA) production processes , 2009 .

[23]  Mohammad Hossein Ordouei,et al.  New simple indices for risk assessment and hazards reduction at the conceptual design stage of a chemical process , 2014 .

[24]  Xiangping Zhang,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment of Chemical Process Using the Green Degree Method , 2008 .

[25]  D. W. Edwards,et al.  A New Safety Risk Index for Use in Petrochemical Planning , 2007 .

[26]  Heriberto Cabezas,et al.  The waste reduction (WAR) algorithm: environmental impacts, energy consumption, and engineering economics , 2000 .

[27]  Mehdi Amini,et al.  Corporate sustainability: an integrative definition and framework to evaluate corporate practice and guide academic research , 2014 .