A note on DEA efficiency assessment using ideal point: An improvement of Wang and Luo's model

Abstract Evaluating the efficiency of organizational units continues to be a difficult problem to solve, especially when the multiplicity of inputs (resources, costs) and outputs (services, products) associated with these units is considered. This paper considers a previous article published by Wang and Luo [Y. Wang, Y. Luo, DEA efficiency assessment using ideal and anti-ideal decision-making units, Applied Mathematics and Computation 173 (2) (2006) 902–915] in the journal of Applied Mathematics and Computation where data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) are integrated in ranking of decision-making units (DMUs). Wang and Luo (2006) contribute to a very interesting topic by showing that the TOPSIS idea can be combined to DEA for a comprehensive ranking of DMUs. However, this paper finds that their approach is problematic in employing the negative ideal point (NIP) for DEA computation. Their ideal point based models rely on using conflicting efficiency concepts. We slightly revised the models so that a DEA analysis using TOPSIS idea can be performed. Numerical demonstration reveals that our approach produces a ranking result that is consistent with that in previous studies.

[1]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions , 1985 .

[2]  M. Asmild,et al.  Using DEA and Worst Practice DEA in Credit Risk Evaluation , 2004 .

[3]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units , 2000 .

[4]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[5]  L. Seiford,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis in the Presence of Both Quantitative and Qualitative Factors , 1996 .

[6]  A. Charnes,et al.  Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks , 1990 .

[7]  N. Petersen,et al.  Chance constrained efficiency evaluation , 1995 .

[8]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Chapter 13 Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[9]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[10]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Kenneth C. Land,et al.  Productive Efficiency under Capitalism and State Socialism: An Empirical Inquiry Using Chance-Constrained Data Envelopment Analysis , 1994 .

[12]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Chance constrained programming approaches to technical efficiencies and inefficiencies in stochastic data envelopment analysis , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  Barton A. Smith,et al.  Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas , 1986 .

[14]  Marvin D. Troutt,et al.  A maximum decisional efficiency estimation principle , 1995 .

[15]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[16]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[17]  Richard H. Silkman,et al.  Measuring efficiency : an assessment of data envelopment analysis , 1986 .

[18]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses , 1994 .

[19]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[20]  Ying Luo,et al.  DEA efficiency assessment using ideal and anti-ideal decision making units , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[21]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming , 1989 .

[22]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1962 .

[23]  Boaz Golany,et al.  An Interactive MOLP Procedure for the Extension of DEA to Effectiveness Analysis , 1988 .

[24]  W. Cooper,et al.  Chance Constrained Programming Formulations for Stochastic Characterizations of Efficiency and Dominance in DEA , 1998 .

[25]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis in the DEA context , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  W. Cooper,et al.  Idea and Ar-Idea: Models for Dealing with Imprecise Data in Dea , 1999 .

[27]  David L. Olson,et al.  Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models , 2004, Math. Comput. Model..

[28]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Efficiency analysis of cross-region bank branches using fuzzy data envelopment analysis , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[29]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[30]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..