Myopic Biases in Strategic Social Prediction: Why Deadlines Put Everyone Under More Pressure Than Everyone Else

Five experiments document biases in the way people predict the outcomes of interdependent social situations. Participants predicted that situational constraints would restrain their own behavior more than it would the behavior of others, even in situations where everyone faced identical constraints. When anticipating the effects of deadlines on outcomes of negotiations, participants predicted that deadlines would hinder their performance more than it would hinder the performance of others. The results shed light on the psychological processes by which people predict the outcomes of and select strategies in strategic social interaction. They extend prior findings, such as people believing themselves to be below average on difficult tasks, to highly interdependent situations. Furthermore, the article shows both how focusing can account for these effects and also how perspective taking can reduce their biasing influence.

[1]  V. A. Harris,et al.  The Attribution of Attitudes , 1967 .

[2]  D. Moore.  Myopic prediction, self-destructive secrecy, and the unexpected benefits of revealing final deadlines in negotiation , 2004 .

[3]  L. Ross,et al.  The role of construal processes in overconfident predictions about the self and others. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Tai Gyu Kim,et al.  Myopic social prediction and the solo comparison effect. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer , 1973 .

[6]  M. Snyder.  On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Social Stereotypes. , 1977 .

[7]  Peter L. Sheras,et al.  "From Jerusalem to Jericho": A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. , 1973 .

[8]  M. D. Storms,et al.  Videotape and the attribution process: reversing actors' and observers' points of view. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  T. Gilovich,et al.  The illusion of transparency: biased assessments of others' ability to read one's emotional states. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Does Living in California Make People Happy? A Focusing Illusion in Judgments of Life Satisfaction , 1998 .

[11]  A. Galinsky,et al.  Perspective-taking: decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Swimming Upstream against the Fundamental Attribution Error: Subjects' Weak Generalizations from the Darley and Batson Study. , 1982 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  The simulation heuristic , 1982 .

[14]  D. Moore,et al.  Ultimatum Bargaining with a Group: Underestimating the Importance of the Decision Rule , 1997 .

[15]  Justin Kruger,et al.  The influence of egocentrism and focalism on people's optimism in competitions: when what affects us equally affects me more. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Y. Klar,et al.  Are Most People Happier than their Peers, or Are They Just Happy? , 1999 .

[17]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Point of view and perceptions of causality. , 1975 .

[18]  P. Wason.  On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task , 1960 .

[19]  Don A. Moore,et al.  The unexpected benefits of final deadlines in negotiation , 2004 .

[20]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Egocentric Empathy Gaps between Owners and Buyers: Misperceptions of the Endowment Effect , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  L. Thompson.  Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. , 1990 .

[22]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nonconscious Behavioral Confirmation Processes: The Self-Fulfilling Consequences of Automatic Stereotype Activation , 1997 .

[23]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  The Nonverbal Mediation of Self-Fulfilling Prophecies in Interracial Interaction. , 1974 .

[24]  Keith J Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic reasoning schemas , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[26]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .

[27]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates , 1992 .

[28]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Perceiver-Induced Constraint: Interpretations of Self-Generated Reality , 1986 .

[29]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality. , 1978 .

[30]  P. Legrenzi,et al.  Event controllability in counterfactual thinking , 1991 .

[31]  G. Yukl.  EFFECTS OF THE OPPONENT'S INITIAL OFFER, CONCESSION MAGNITUDE, AND CONCESSION FREQUENCY ON BARGAINING BEHAVIOR , 1974 .

[32]  M. A. Safer.  Attributing Evil to the Subject, Not the Situation , 1980 .

[33]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives , 1986 .

[34]  Sheryl B. Ball,et al.  An evaluation of learning in the bilateral winner's curse , 1991 .

[35]  J. Kruger.  Lake Wobegon be gone! The "below-average effect" and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  R. Hastie,et al.  Social perception in negotiation , 1990 .

[37]  «They saw a negotiation»: partisanship and involvement , 1995 .

[38]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[39]  L. Ross,et al.  The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes , 1977 .

[40]  V. Girotto,et al.  Distinguishing Sources of Cooperation in the One-Round Prisoner's Dilemma: Evidence for Cooperative Decisions Based on the Illusion of Control , 1998 .

[41]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Egocentric Interpretations of Fairness in Asymmetric, Environmental Social Dilemmas: Explaining Harvesting Behavior and the Role of Communication , 1996 .

[42]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Social Roles, Social Control and Biases in Social Perception , 1977 .

[43]  Sandy Lovie.  How the mind works , 1980, Nature.

[44]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Focalism: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  LOSE-LOSE AGREEMENTS IN INTERDEPENDENT DECISION MAKING , 1996 .

[46]  D T Regan,et al.  Empathy and attribution: turning observers into actors. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.