Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PREFACE Materials used for thermal insulation and storage, along with other construction and building envelope components, are subjected to transient thermal conditions which can include dynamically changing temperature, moisture content, surface heat transfer, specific heat, etc. In addition, most building design and energy-related standards are based on a steady-state criterion (R-values using the apparent thermal conductivity measurements). This mismatch between the steady-state principles used in design and code requirements and the dynamic operation of buildings can result in lower thermal efficiency than achievable or higher cost (due to addition of more insulation than required). This mismatch can also lead to a gross underestimation of the performance of materials that store energy under cyclic temperature conditions, for example phase change materials (PCM). Although some experimental methods for transient analysis of building envelopes have been developed, there are no standardized testing procedures available to quantitatively characterize materials and systems under dynamic conditions. Data on dynamic material characteristics are needed to improve thermal design and analysis, whole-building simulations, and energy code-related work. This led to the development of a proposed ASTM Standard Test Method for characterizing PCM products under dynamic conditions.
[2]
T. K. Stovall,et al.
What are the potential benefits of including latent storage in common wallboard
,
1995
.
[3]
Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.
Modeling phase change materials behavior in building applications: Comments on material characterization and model validation
,
2012
.
[4]
Jan Kosny,et al.
Performance characterization of PCM impregnated gypsum board for building applications
,
2012
.
[5]
Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.
Determination of the enthalpy of PCM as a function of temperature using a heat‐flux DSC—A study of different measurement procedures and their accuracy
,
2008
.
[6]
D. W. Yarbrough,et al.
Dynamic thermal performance analysis of fiber insulations containing bio-based phase change materials (PCMs)
,
2012
.
[7]
Zhang Yinping,et al.
A simple method, the -history method, of determining the heat of fusion, specific heat and thermal conductivity of phase-change materials
,
1999
.
[8]
R. J. Kedl,et al.
Wallboard with Latent Heat Storage for Passive Solar Applications
,
2001
.
[9]
Harald Mehling,et al.
Enthalpy of Phase Change Materials as a Function of Temperature: Required Accuracy and Suitable Measurement Methods
,
2009
.
[10]
Som S Shrestha,et al.
Theoretical and Experimental Thermal Performance Analysis of Complex Thermal Storage Membrane Containing Bio-Based Phase Change Material (PCM)
,
2010
.
[11]
Jose M. Marin,et al.
Verification of a T-history installation to measure enthalpy versus temperature curves of phase change materials
,
2006
.