Multi-Scaffolding Environment: An Analysis of Scaffolding and its Impact on Cognitive Load and Problem-Solving Ability

A Multi-Scaffolding Environment (MSE) is a multimedia environment reliant on authentic scaffolding. We examine the impact of the availability of multiple scaffolds on learning and cognitive load within an MSE where learners are assigned a real-world task and given access to four support tools to help them complete the task. By examining an MSE in the area of geographic literacy, we explore the effectiveness of problem-based learning and whether multiple scaffolding is applicable to any content area. Quantitative and qualitative data indicate that a learner-controlled multi-scaffolding approach may be a valuable approach in problem-based learning contexts.

[1]  Richard H. Audet,et al.  The Status of GIS Technology in Teacher Preparation Programs , 1999 .

[2]  F. Paas,et al.  Measurement of Cognitive Load in Instructional Research , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  John R. Mergendoller,et al.  Problem-Based Learning: Modifying the Medical School Model for Teaching High School Economics , 2001 .

[4]  D. Laplane.  Thought and language. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.

[5]  B. Rogoff.  Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context , 1990 .

[6]  Bryan A. West.  Student Attitudes and the Impact of GIS on Thinking Skills and Motivation , 2003 .

[7]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and the Use of Technology , 2007 .

[8]  Richard H. Audet,et al.  GIS Implementation Model for Schools: Assessing the Critical Concerns , 1997 .

[9]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction , 1996 .

[10]  Daniel Z. Sui,et al.  A Pedagogic Framework to Link GIS to the Intellectual Core of Geography , 1995 .

[11]  Thomas R. Baker,et al.  Lessons Learned from Reviewing Research in GIS Education , 2003 .

[12]  Joan E. Hughes,et al.  The Role of Teacher Knowledge and Learning Experiences in Forming Technology-Integrated Pedagogy , 2005 .

[13]  Lyn Malone,et al.  Mapping Our World: GIS Lessons for Educators , 2002 .

[14]  Imogen Taylor,et al.  The challenge of problem-based learning , 1997 .

[15]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking , 1999 .

[16]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[17]  Thomas R. Baker,et al.  The Effects of G.I.S. on Students' Attitudes, Self-efficacy, and Achievement in Middle School Science Classrooms , 2003 .

[18]  C. Vanderbilt.  The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design , 1992 .

[19]  M. Donnelly,et al.  Characteristics of the Ideal Problem-Based Learning Tutor in Clinical Medicine , 1995 .

[20]  Fred G. W. C. Paas,et al.  The Efficiency of Instructional Conditions: An Approach to Combine Mental Effort and Performance Measures , 1992 .

[21]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[22]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[23]  Aaron Doering,et al.  GIS in education: An examination of pedagogy , 2003 .

[24]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  Intelligent Agents as Cognitive Tools for Education. , 1999 .

[25]  J. Hughes,et al.  Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? , 2003 .

[26]  John W. Saye,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of a student-centered learning unit: A case study , 2000 .

[27]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Jumping the PBL Implementation Hurdle: Supporting the Efforts of K-12 Teachers. , 2006 .

[28]  E. Pellicer.  Anchored Instruction and Its Relationship to Situated Cognition , 1990 .

[29]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers as cognitive tools: Learningwith technology, notfrom technology , 1995, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[30]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[31]  J. Hughes.  Technology Learning Principles for Preservice and In-service Teacher Education , 2004 .

[32]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Research for educational Communications and Technology , 1997 .

[33]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[34]  Jorma Enkenberg,et al.  Instructional design and emerging teaching models in higher education , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Agneta Gulz,et al.  Benefits of Virtual Characters in Computer Based Learning Environments: Claims and Evidence , 2004, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[36]  R. Gallimore,et al.  Rousing Minds to Life: Teaching, Learning, and Schooling in Social Context , 1988 .

[37]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[38]  Rick L. Bunch,et al.  The Cognitive Load of Geographic Information , 2006 .

[39]  Thomas Brush,et al.  The Use of Embedded Scaffolds with Hypermedia-Supported Student-Centered Learning , 2001 .

[40]  S. Lenski,et al.  STRATEGY INSTRUCTION FROM A SOCIOCOGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE , 2002 .

[41]  D. Boud,et al.  The challenge of problem-based learning 2nd ed , 1997 .

[42]  Janet D. Ward,et al.  A REVIEW OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING , 2002 .

[43]  F. Paas.  Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .

[44]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[45]  Aaron Doering,et al.  Conversational Agents and Their Longitudinal Affordances on Communication and Interaction , 2008 .