Evolving genealogies for branching populations under selection and competition

For a continuous state branching process with two types of individuals which are subject to selection and density dependent competition, we characterize the joint evolution of population size, type configurations and genealogies as the unique strong solution of a system of SDE’s. Our construction is achieved in the lookdown framework and provides a synthesis as well as a generalization of cases considered separately in two seminal papers by Donnelly and Kurtz (1999), namely fluctuating population sizes under neutrality, and selection with constant population size. As a conceptual core in our approach, we introduce the selective lookdown space which is obtained from its neutral counterpart through a state-dependent thinning of “potential” selection/competition events whose rates interact with the evolution of the type densities. The updates of the genealogical distance matrix at the “active” selection/competition events are obtained through an appropriate sampling from the selective lookdown space. The solution of the above mentioned system of SDE’s is then mapped into the joint evolution of population size and symmetrized type configurations and genealogies, i.e. marked distance matrix distributions. By means of Kurtz’s Markov mapping theorem, we characterize the latter process as the unique solution of a martingale problem. For the sake of transparency we restrict the main part of our presentation to a prototypical example with two types, which contains the essential features. In the final section we outline an extension to processes with multiple types including mutation.

[1]  A. Wakolbinger,et al.  The process of most recent common ancestors in an evolving coalescent , 2005, math/0511743.

[2]  T. Kurtz Martingale Problems for Conditional Distributions of Markov Processes , 1998 .

[3]  A. Etheridge,et al.  An introduction to superprocesses , 2000 .

[4]  Wolfgang Lohr,et al.  Existence of mark functions in marked metric measure spaces , 2014, 1412.2039.

[5]  P. Protter On the Existence, Uniqueness, Convergence and Explosions of Solutions of Systems of Stochastic Integral Equations , 1977 .

[6]  Probabilistic aspects of Λ-coalescents in equilibrium and in evolution , 2020 .

[7]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Particle Representations for Measure-Valued Population Models , 1999 .

[8]  D. Aldous Stochastic Analysis: The Continuum random tree II: an overview , 1991 .

[9]  R. Wolpert Lévy Processes , 2000 .

[10]  Stephan Gufler Pathwise construction of tree-valued Fleming-Viot processes , 2014, 1404.3682.

[11]  N. Berestycki,et al.  Kingman's coalescent and Brownian motion. , 2009, 0904.1526.

[12]  P. Pfaffelhuber,et al.  Tree-valued Fleming–Viot dynamics with mutation and selection , 2011, 1101.0759.

[13]  P. Pfaffelhuber,et al.  Marked metric measure spaces , 2011, 1101.4213.

[14]  J. L. Gall,et al.  Random trees and applications , 2005 .

[16]  S. Evans Kingman's coalescent as a random metric space , 2016 .

[17]  M. Yor,et al.  Continuous martingales and Brownian motion , 1990 .

[18]  Viet Chi Tran,et al.  Dynamics of lineages in adaptation to a gradual environmental change , 2021 .

[19]  S. Ethier,et al.  Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence , 2005 .

[20]  A. Wakolbinger,et al.  From exploration paths to mass excursions – variations on a theme of Ray and Knight , 2011 .

[21]  V. Tran,et al.  Stochastic dynamics of adaptive trait and neutral marker driven by eco-evolutionary feedbacks , 2013, Journal of mathematical biology.

[22]  V. Tran,et al.  Nonlinear historical superprocess approximations for population models with past dependence , 2011, 1107.2052.

[23]  E. Dynkin Branching particle systems and superprocesses , 1991 .

[24]  Evolving phylogenies of trait-dependent branching with mutation and competition, Part I: Existence , 2017, 1705.03277.

[25]  A representation for exchangeable coalescent trees and generalized tree-valued Fleming-Viot processes , 2016, 1608.08074.

[26]  A. Wakolbinger,et al.  “Trees under attack”: a Ray–Knight representation of Feller’s branching diffusion with logistic growth , 2013, 1305.1202.

[27]  T. Kurtz,et al.  Genealogical constructions of population models , 2014, The Annals of Probability.

[28]  Poisson representations of branching Markov and measure-valued branching processes. , 2011, 1104.1496.

[29]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Genealogical processes for Fleming-Viot models with selection and recombination , 1999 .

[30]  A compact containment result for nonlinear historical superprocess approximations for population models with trait-dependence , 2014, 1405.0815.

[31]  E. A. Perkins Conditional Dawson—Watanabe Processes and Fleming—Viot Processes , 1992 .

[32]  J. Fontbona,et al.  Ray–Knight representation of flows of branching processes with competition by pruning of Lévy trees , 2015, 1506.00046.