Canonical rules for plant organ biomass partitioning and annual allocation.

Here we review a general allometric model for the allometric relationships among standing leaf, stem, and root biomass (M(L), M(S), and M(R), respectively) and the exponents for the relationships among annual leaf, stem, and root biomass production or "growth rates" (G(L), G(S), and G(R), respectively). This model predicts that M(L) ∝ M(S)(3/4) ∝ M(R)(3/4) such that M(S) ∝ M(R) and that G(L) ∝ G(S) ∝ G(R). A large synoptic data set for standing plant organ biomass and organ biomass production spanning ten orders of magnitude in total plant body mass supports these predictions. Although the numerical values for the allometric "constants" governing these scaling relationships differ between angiosperms and conifers, across all species, standing leaf, stem, and root biomass, respectively, comprise 8%, 67%, and 25% of total plant biomass, whereas annual leaf, stem, and root biomass growth represent 30%, 57%, and 13% of total plant growth. Importantly, our analyses of large data sets confirm the existence of scaling exponents predicted by theory. These scaling "rules" emerge from simple biophysical mechanisms that hold across a remarkably broad spectrum of ecologically and phyletically divergent herbaceous and tree-sized monocot, dicot, and conifer species. As such, they are likely to extend into evolutionary history when tracheophytes with the stereotypical "leaf," "stem," and "root" body plan first appeared.

[1]  C. Duarte,et al.  Broad-scale comparison of photosynthetic rates across phototrophic organisms , 1996, Oecologia.

[2]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  On the Vegetative Biomass Partitioning of Seed Plant Leaves, Stems, and Roots , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[3]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  Global Allocation Rules for Patterns of Biomass Partitioning in Seed Plants , 2002, Science.

[4]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Invariant scaling relations across tree-dominated communities , 2001, Nature.

[5]  K J Niklas,et al.  Invariant scaling relationships for interspecific plant biomass production rates and body size , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  H. Helmisaari,et al.  Fine root biomass and production in Scots pine stands in relation to stand age. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[7]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review , 2000 .

[8]  Y. Iwasa.  Dynamic optimization of plant growth , 2000 .

[9]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants , 1999, Nature.

[10]  P. Reich,et al.  Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. , 1999, American journal of botany.

[11]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems , 1999, Nature.

[12]  J. Cornelissen.  A triangular relationship between leaf size and seed size among woody species: allometry, ontogeny, ecology and taxonomy , 1999, Oecologia.

[13]  J. Grace,et al.  Plant resource allocation , 1998 .

[14]  Plato's Plant: On the Mathematical Structure of Simple Plants and Canopies , 1998 .

[15]  James H. Brown,et al.  A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology , 1997, Science.

[16]  T. Andersson.  Seasonal dynamics of biomass and nutrients in Hepatica nobilis , 1997 .

[17]  K. Niklas.  The evolutionary biology of plants , 1997 .

[18]  F. Day,et al.  ROOT PRODUCTION IN FOUR COMMUNITIES IN THE GREAT DISMAL SWAMP , 1991 .

[19]  Knute J. Nadelhoffer,et al.  Belowground Carbon Allocation in Forest Ecosystems: Global Trends , 1989 .

[20]  Hendrik Poorter.  Plant growth analysis: towards a synthesis of the classical and the functional approach , 1989 .

[21]  B. McArdle.  The structural relationship: regression in biology , 1988 .

[22]  M. Labarbera.  The Evolution and Ecology of Body Size , 1986 .

[23]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Shoot/root balance of plants: Optimal growth of a system with many vegetative organs , 1984 .

[24]  R. Peters.  The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[25]  M. Zimmermann.  Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap , 1983, Springer Series in Wood Science.

[26]  Paul J. Kramer,et al.  Water Relations of Plants , 1983 .

[27]  P. J. Edwards,et al.  World Forest Biomass and Primary Production Data. , 1983 .

[28]  S. Gould.  ALLOMETRY AND SIZE IN ONTOGENY AND PHYLOGENY , 1966, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[29]  J. Huxley.  Problems of relative growth , 1932 .

[30]  C. D. Murray.  A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CIRCUMFERENCE AND WEIGHT IN TREES AND ITS BEARING ON BRANCHING ANGLES , 1927, The Journal of general physiology.