Evidence for Axis-Aligned Motion Bias: Football Axis—Trajectory Misalignment Causes Systematic Error in Projected Final Destinations of Thrown American Footballs

The axis-aligned motion (AAM) bias is the tendency of observers to assume that symmetric moving objects maintain axis–trajectory alignment and to bias their judgments of trajectory toward the axis when they are misaligned. We tested whether humans exhibit an AAM bias in a realistic, cue-rich, 3-D setting by examining the impact of axis–trajectory misalignment on estimates of final destinations of thrown American footballs. In experiments 1 and 2 we show that observers are significantly worse in judging destinations of footballs than those of volleyballs and basketballs. This difference in performance is due to the deviation of the football's axis from trajectory in flight, as shown by the correspondence of participants' lateral judgment error and the football's lateral axial deviation from trajectory, which was predicted by passer handedness. Nearly all animals exhibit bilateral symmetry and maintain axis–trajectory alignment during locomotion, and we argue that the AAM bias is complementary mental attunement to the natural regularity of this axis-aligned motion. Furthermore, this bias is also a prototypical example of a perceptual regularity that is a mixed blessing—advantageous in perceptual judgment tasks of axis–trajectory-aligned moving entities like most living creatures, and disadvantageous in tasks demanding judgments of axis–trajectory-misaligned moving objects which are typically artifacts.

[1]  P Wenderoth,et al.  The Salience of Vertical Symmetry , 1994, Perception.

[2]  S. Palmer,et al.  Effects of motion on perceived pointing of ambiguous triangles , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  R. Shepard Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[4]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Three-Dimensional Bilateral Symmetry Bias in Judgments of Figural Identity and Orientation , 1997 .

[5]  C Marendaz,et al.  Detection of shape orientation depends on salient axes of symmetry and elongation: Evidence from visual search , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  A. Clark Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[7]  B. Jayne,et al.  Muscular mechanisms of snake locomotion: an electromyographic study of the sidewinding and concertina modes of Crotalus cerastes, Nerodia fasciata and Elaphe obsoleta. , 1988, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  David Birchfield,et al.  The influence of locomotion on the axis-aligned motion bias in large situated display environments , 2010 .

[9]  K. Morikawa,et al.  Symmetry and elongation of objects influence perceived direction of translational motion , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  István Hargittai,et al.  Symmetry: A Unifying Concept , 1994 .

[11]  R. Wootton Invertebrate paraxial locomotory appendages: design, deformation and control. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  J. Piaget The Mechanisms of Perception , 1971 .

[13]  S. Palmer,et al.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. , 1978, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[14]  P. Wenderoth THE ROLE OF IMPLICIT AXES OF BILATERAL SYMMETRY IN ORIENTATION PROCESSING , 1997 .

[15]  W. Rae Flight dynamics of an American football in a forward pass , 2003 .

[16]  P Wenderoth,et al.  The Effects of Dot Pattern Parameters and Constraints on the Relative Salience of Vertical Bilateral Symmetry , 1996, Vision Research.

[17]  P Wenderoth,et al.  Detection of Bilateral Symmetry in Complex Biological Images , 2000, Perception.

[18]  A B Sekuler,et al.  Interactions between symmetry and elongation in determining reference frames for object perception. , 2000, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[19]  D E Humphrey,et al.  The role of structure in infant visual pattern perception. , 1989, Canadian journal of psychology.

[20]  R N Shepard,et al.  Apparent motion between shapes differing in location and orientation: A window technique for estimating path curvature , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  P Wenderoth,et al.  The Effects on Bilateral-Symmetry Detection of Multiple Symmetry, near Symmetry, and Axis Orientation , 1997, Perception.

[22]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Eleanor J. Gibson,et al.  An Odyssey in Learning and Perception , 1991 .

[24]  M H Pornstein,et al.  Perception of symmetry in infancy: the salience of vertical symmetry and the perception of pattern wholes. , 1985, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[25]  Ernst Mach,et al.  The analysis of sensations and the relation of the physical to the psychical , 1914, The Mathematical Gazette.

[26]  C. Gross,et al.  Perception of symmetry in infancy. , 1981 .

[27]  W. B. Webb,et al.  The motivational aspect of an irrelevant drive in the behavior of the white rat. , 1949, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[29]  C. Tyler Human Symmetry Perception and Its Computational Analysis , 2002 .

[30]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[31]  Robert Shapiro,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Dynamic Analysis of the Quarterback's Throwing Motion in American Football , 1995 .

[32]  Edward S. Reed,et al.  An Odyssey in Learning and Perception. , 1992 .

[33]  P Wenderoth Monocular symmetry is neither necessary nor sufficient for the dichoptic perception of bilateral symmetry , 2000, Vision Research.

[34]  B Tversky,et al.  Force of symmetry in form perception. , 1984, The American journal of psychology.

[35]  John G. Neuhoff,et al.  The Doppler effect is not what you think it is: Dramatic pitch change due to dynamic intensity change , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  P. J. Brancazio The physics of kicking a football , 1985 .

[37]  Diane J. Schiano,et al.  Tops are more salient than bottoms , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  H. Helmholtz Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1963 .

[39]  G. Fleisig,et al.  Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison between Baseball Pitching and Football Passing , 1996 .

[40]  R. Arnheim Art and Visual Perception, a Psychology of the Creative Eye , 1967 .