Accuracy of Estimation of Graft Size for Living-Related Liver Transplantation: First Results of a Semi-Automated Interactive Software for CT-Volumetry

Objectives To evaluate accuracy of estimated graft size for living-related liver transplantation using a semi-automated interactive software for CT-volumetry. Materials and Methods Sixteen donors for living-related liver transplantation (11 male; mean age: 38.2±9.6 years) underwent contrast-enhanced CT prior to graft removal. CT-volumetry was performed using a semi-automated interactive software (P), and compared with a manual commercial software (TR). For P, liver volumes were provided either with or without vessels. For TR, liver volumes were provided always with vessels. Intraoperative weight served as reference standard. Major study goals included analyses of volumes using absolute numbers, linear regression analyses and inter-observer agreements. Minor study goals included the description of the software workflow: degree of manual correction, speed for completion, and overall intuitiveness using five-point Likert scales: 1–markedly lower/faster/higher for P compared with TR, 2–slightly lower/faster/higher for P compared with TR, 3–identical for P and TR, 4–slightly lower/faster/higher for TR compared with P, and 5–markedly lower/faster/higher for TR compared with P. Results Liver segments II/III, II–IV and V–VIII served in 6, 3, and 7 donors as transplanted liver segments. Volumes were 642.9±368.8 ml for TR with vessels, 623.8±349.1 ml for P with vessels, and 605.2±345.8 ml for P without vessels (P<0.01). Regression equations between intraoperative weights and volumes were y = 0.94x+30.1 (R2 = 0.92; P<0.001) for TR with vessels, y = 1.00x+12.0 (R2 = 0.92; P<0.001) for P with vessels, and y = 1.01x+28.0 (R2 = 0.92; P<0.001) for P without vessels. Inter-observer agreement showed a bias of 1.8 ml for TR with vessels, 5.4 ml for P with vessels, and 4.6 ml for P without vessels. For the degree of manual correction, speed for completion and overall intuitiveness, scale values were 2.6±0.8, 2.4±0.5 and 2. Conclusions CT-volumetry performed with P can predict accurately graft size for living-related liver transplantation while improving workflow compared with TR.

[1]  H. Friess,et al.  Living Related Liver Transplantation: The Ultimate Technique to Expand the Donor Pool? , 2005, Transplantation.

[2]  H. Won,et al.  Right lobe estimated blood-free weight for living donor liver transplantation: accuracy of automated blood-free CT volumetry--preliminary results. , 2010, Radiology.

[3]  Masatoshi Hori,et al.  Computed tomography liver volumetry using 3‐dimensional image data in living donor liver transplantation: Effects of the slice thickness on the volume calculation , 2011, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[4]  H. Meinzer,et al.  Computer-based liver volumetry in the liver perfusion simulator. , 2011, The Journal of surgical research.

[5]  M. Makuuchi,et al.  Discrepancy between estimated and actual weight of partial liver graft from living donors , 2011, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[6]  Q. Kang,et al.  Usage of 64-detector-row spiral computed tomography volumetry in preoperative volume prediction in living donor liver transplantation in children , 2011, Pediatric Surgery International.

[7]  Ralf Tetzlaff,et al.  How many CT detector rows are necessary to perform adequate three dimensional visualization? , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[8]  Peter Neuhaus,et al.  Living donor right liver lobes: preoperative CT volumetric measurement for calculation of intraoperative weight and volume. , 2006, Radiology.

[9]  I. Kamel,et al.  Living adult right lobe liver transplantation: imaging before surgery with multidetector multiphase CT. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  T. Hibi,et al.  Determination of the safe range of graft size mismatch using body surface area index in deceased liver transplantation , 2013, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[11]  T. Heimann,et al.  Branching Patterns and Drainage Territories of the Middle Hepatic Vein in Computer‐Simulated Right Living‐Donor Hepatectomies , 2006, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[12]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Automated hepatic volumetry for living related liver transplantation at multisection CT. , 2006, Radiology.

[13]  Liver regeneration in living-related donors after harvesting of liver segments II and III or II, III and IV. , 2003, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[14]  J. Encke,et al.  Living-donor liver transplantation: evaluation of donor and recipient. , 2004, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[15]  Thomas Becker,et al.  Evaluation of living liver donors using contrast enhanced multidetector CT – The radiologists impact on donor selection , 2012, BMC Medical Imaging.

[16]  Wei Xiong,et al.  Liver tumour segmentation using contrast-enhanced multi-detector CT data: performance benchmarking of three semiautomated methods , 2010, European Radiology.

[17]  Stephen J. Wigmore,et al.  Prospective Volumetric Assessment of the Liver on a Personal Computer by Nonradiologists Prior to Partial Hepatectomy , 2010, World Journal of Surgery.

[18]  R. Grant,et al.  Living vs. deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2013, Clinical transplantation.

[19]  H. Okajima,et al.  Coefficient factor for graft weight estimation from preoperative computed tomography volumetry in living donor liver transplantation , 2011, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[20]  W. Heindel,et al.  Liver lesion segmentation in MSCT: effect of slice thickness on segmentation quality, measurement precision and interobserver variability. , 2011, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[21]  J. Pomposelli,et al.  Accurate Estimation of Living Donor Right Hemi‐Liver Volume From Portal Vein Diameter Measurement and Standard Liver Volume Calculation , 2012, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[22]  J. Weitz,et al.  Partial liver transplantation-living donor liver transplantation and split liver transplantation. , 2007, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.