Stereoscopic 3D objects evoke stronger saliency for nonverbal working memory: An fMRI study

Effective working memory (WM) training is often desired to improve WM. Recent studies have suggested that WM training is more successful when participants monitor scenes in three‐dimensional (3D) environments. Although previous neuroimaging studies have examined visuospatial WM in relation to a 3D scene or object, these studies did not investigate WM using stereoscopic 3D object stimuli. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to identify brain activation during an N‐back task with 3D object stimuli, and determined the difference in activation pattern between stereoscopic versus shaded 3D objects. We found that the anterior insula, ventral striatum, and posterior orbitofrontal cortex showed greater activation during the 2‐back task with stereoscopic 3D objects than with shaded 3D objects. These regions have previously been associated with a salience network.

[1]  W. Schultz.  Getting Formal with Dopamine and Reward , 2002, Neuron.

[2]  Nora D. Volkow,et al.  Incentive motivation is associated with striatal dopamine asymmetry , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[3]  P. Phillips,et al.  Pavlovian valuation systems in learning and decision making , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dissociable Roles of Ventral and Dorsal Striatum in Instrumental Conditioning , 2004, Science.

[5]  H. Forssberg,et al.  Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD--a randomized, controlled trial. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[6]  E. Rolls,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology , 2004, Progress in Neurobiology.

[7]  David Hecht,et al.  Depression and the hyperactive right-hemisphere , 2010, Neuroscience Research.

[8]  T. Ellmore,et al.  Altered nigrostriatal and nigrocortical functional connectivity in rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. , 2013, Sleep.

[9]  Robin M. Chan,et al.  Working memory for complex figures: an fMRI comparison of letter and fractal n-back tasks. , 2002, Neuropsychology.

[10]  Kathryn M. McMillan,et al.  N‐back working memory paradigm: A meta‐analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[11]  F. Mottaghy,et al.  Topographic segregation and convergence of verbal, object, shape and spatial working memory in humans , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  Marko Wilke,et al.  LI-tool: A new toolbox to assess lateralization in functional MR-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Contributions of the striatum to learning, motivation, and performance: an associative account , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  E. Rolls,et al.  Value, Pleasure and Choice in the Ventral Prefrontal Cortex , 2022 .

[15]  Yang Jiang,et al.  Individual differences in cognition, affect, and performance: Behavioral, neuroimaging, and molecular genetic approaches , 2012, NeuroImage.

[16]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Where and When the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Modulates Attentional Response: Combined fMRI and ERP Evidence , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Justin N. Wood.  Distinct Visual Working Memory Systems for View-Dependent and View-Invariant Representation , 2009, PloS one.

[18]  Hideo Sakata,et al.  Neural mechanisms of three-dimensional vision , 2005, Neuroscience Research.

[19]  V. Menon,et al.  Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[20]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Anticipation of Increasing Monetary Reward Selectively Recruits Nucleus Accumbens , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  M. Kringelbach.  The human orbitofrontal cortex: linking reward to hedonic experience , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  Andy C. H. Lee,et al.  A Potential Spatial Working Memory Training Task to Improve Both Episodic Memory and Fluid Intelligence , 2012, PloS one.