How super is supercontraction? Persistent versus cyclic responses to humidity in spider dragline silk

SUMMARY Spider dragline silk has enormous potential for the development of biomimetic fibers that combine strength and elasticity in low density polymers. These applications necessitate understanding how silk reacts to different environmental conditions. For instance, spider dragline silk `supercontracts' in high humidity. During supercontraction, unrestrained dragline silk contracts up to 50% of its original length and restrained fibers generate substantial stress. Here we characterize the response of dragline silk to changes in humidity before, during and after supercontraction. Our findings demonstrate that dragline silk exhibits two qualitatively different responses to humidity. First, silk undergoes a previously unknown cyclic relaxation–contraction response to wetting and drying. The direction and magnitude of this cyclic response is identical both before and after supercontraction. By contrast, supercontraction is a `permanent' tensioning of restrained silk in response to high humidity. Here, water induces stress, rather than relaxation and the uptake of water molecules results in a permanent change in molecular composition of the silk, as demonstrated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Even after drying, silk mass increased by∼ 1% after supercontraction. By contrast, the cyclic response to humidity involves a reversible uptake of water. Dried, post-supercontraction silk also differs mechanically from virgin silk. Post-supercontraction silk exhibits reduced stiffness and stress at yield, as well as changes in dynamic energy storage and dissipation. In addition to advancing understanding supercontraction, our findings open up new applications for synthetic silk analogs. For example, dragline silk emerges as a model for a biomimetic muscle, the contraction of which is precisely controlled by humidity alone.

[1]  M. E. Demont,et al.  Spider silk as rubber , 1984, Nature.

[2]  R. Cardullo,et al.  Polarized Light Microscopy, Variability in Spider Silk Diameters, and the Mechanical Characterization of Spider Silk , 2005 .

[3]  R. Lewis,et al.  Extreme Diversity, Conservation, and Convergence of Spider Silk Fibroin Sequences , 2001, Science.

[4]  B. Meier,et al.  Supercontracted spider dragline silk: a solid-state NMR study of the local structure. , 1999, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[5]  G. V. Guinea,et al.  Stretching of supercontracted fibers: a link between spinning and the variability of spider silk , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  M. Elices,et al.  Controlled supercontraction tailors the tensile behaviour of spider silk , 2003 .

[7]  G. Plaza,et al.  Thermo‐hygro‐mechanical behavior of spider dragline silk: Glassy and rubbery states , 2006 .

[8]  Todd A Blackledge,et al.  Quasistatic and continuous dynamic characterization of the mechanical properties of silk from the cobweb of the black widow spider Latrodectus hesperus , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[9]  J. Bond,et al.  TESTING ADAPTIVE RADIATION AND KEY INNOVATION HYPOTHESES IN SPIDERS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  C. Viney,et al.  Non-periodic lattice crystals in the hierarchical microstructure of spider (major ampullate) silk. , 1997, Biopolymers.

[11]  G. Plaza,et al.  Recovery in spider silk fibers , 2004 .

[12]  Oskar Liivak,et al.  Supercontraction and Backbone Dynamics in Spider Silk: 13C and 2H NMR Studies , 2000 .

[13]  Christopher Viney,et al.  Fibre science: Supercontraction stress in wet spider dragline , 2002, Nature.

[14]  David T. Grubb,et al.  Fiber Morphology of Spider Silk: The Effects of Tensile Deformation , 1997 .

[15]  S. Wong,et al.  Supercontraction forces in spider dragline silk depend on hydration rate. , 2009, Zoology.

[16]  F. Vollrath,et al.  Spider and mulberry silkworm silks as compatible biomaterials , 2007 .

[17]  G. Plaza,et al.  The effect of spinning forces on spider silk properties , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  Robert W. Work,et al.  The Force-Elongation Behavior of Web Fibers and Silks Forcibly Obtained from Orb-Web-Spinning Spiders , 1976 .

[19]  Manuel Elices,et al.  Example of microprocessing in a natural polymeric fiber: Role of reeling stress in spider silk , 2006 .

[20]  G. Plaza,et al.  Volume constancy during stretching of spider silk. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.

[21]  F Vollrath,et al.  Strength and structure of spiders' silks. , 2000, Journal of biotechnology.

[22]  Adam P. Summers,et al.  Gumfooted lines in black widow cobwebs and the mechanical properties of spider capture silk. , 2005, Zoology.

[23]  F. Grosse,et al.  Differential polymerization of the two main protein components of dragline silk during fibre spinning , 2005, Nature materials.

[24]  L. Jelinski,et al.  Orientation, structure, wet-spinning, and molecular basis for supercontraction of spider dragline silk. , 1999, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[25]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk , 2001, Nature.

[26]  Steven Vogel,et al.  Comparative Biomechanics: Life's Physical World , 2003 .

[27]  R. W. Work A Comparative Study of the Supercontraction of Major Ampullate Silk Fibers of Orb-Web-Building Spiders (Araneae) , 1981 .

[28]  F. Vollrath,et al.  The Role of Behavior in the Evolution of Spiders, Silks, and Webs , 2007 .

[29]  S. Fossey,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Major Ampulate Gland Silk Fibers Extracted fromNephila clavipesSpiders , 1993 .

[30]  J. Gosline,et al.  Supercontraction stress in spider webs. , 2004, Biomacromolecules.

[31]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Spider silk as archetypal protein elastomer. , 2006, Soft matter.

[32]  D. Porter,et al.  Proline and processing of spider silks. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[33]  D. Porter,et al.  Spider silk as a model biomaterial , 2006 .

[34]  M B Hinman,et al.  Isolation of a clone encoding a second dragline silk fibroin. Nephila clavipes dragline silk is a two-protein fiber. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[35]  R. W. Work Viscoelastic Behaviour and Wet Supercontraction of Major Ampullate Silk Fibres of Certain Orb-Web-Building Spiders (Araneae) , 1985 .

[36]  J. Gosline,et al.  The effect of proline on the network structure of major ampullate silks as inferred from their mechanical and optical properties , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[37]  A. Summers,et al.  SPIDER DRAGLINE SILK: CORRELATED AND MOSAIC EVOLUTION IN HIGH-PERFORMANCE BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  Tim Salditt,et al.  Spider silk softening by water uptake: an AFM study , 2008, European Biophysics Journal.

[39]  Z. Guan Supramolecular design in biopolymers and biomimetic polymers for advanced mechanical properties , 2007 .

[40]  R. W. Work,et al.  A Physico-Chemical Study of the Supercontraction of Spider Major Ampullate Silk Fibers , 1982 .

[41]  Ingi Agnarsson,et al.  Spider silk as a novel high performance biomimetic muscle driven by humidity , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[42]  G. Plaza,et al.  Self-tightening of spider silk fibers induced by moisture , 2003 .

[43]  John M Gosline,et al.  Consequences of forced silking. , 2004, Biomacromolecules.

[44]  Z. Shao,et al.  The effect of solvents on spider silk studied by mechanical testing and single-fibre Raman spectroscopy. , 1999, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[45]  F Vollrath,et al.  The effect of spinning conditions on the mechanics of a spider's dragline silk , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Z. Shao,et al.  The effect of solvents on the contraction and mechanical properties of spider silk , 1999 .

[47]  S. Russo,et al.  Comprehensive polymer science: the synthesis, characterization, reactions & applic ations of polymers , 1989 .

[48]  Robert W. Work,et al.  Dimensions, Birefringences, and Force-Elongation Behavior of Major and Minor Ampullate Silk Fibers from Orb-Web-Spinning Spiders—The Effects of Wetting on these Properties , 1977 .

[49]  W. W. Adams,et al.  The color of dragline silk produced in captivity by the spider Nephila clavipes , 2004 .

[50]  R. Lewis,et al.  Structure of a protein superfiber: spider dragline silk. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  G. Plaza,et al.  Fracture surfaces and tensile properties of UV‐irradiated spider silk fibers , 2007 .

[52]  W. Kreuder,et al.  Comprehensive Polymer Science: The Synthesis, Characterization, Reactions and Applications of Polymers. (7 Bde.). Herausgegeben von G. Allen und J. C. Bevington. Pergamon Press, Oxford 1989. 5367 S., geb. $ 1995.00. – ISBN 0‐08‐032516‐5 , 1990 .

[53]  B. Meier,et al.  Local Structure in Spider Dragline Silk Investigated by Two-Dimensional Spin-Diffusion Nuclear Magnetic Resonance† , 1996 .

[54]  J. Gosline,et al.  The role of proline in the elastic mechanism of hydrated spider silks , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[55]  C. Michal,et al.  Strain Dependent Local Phase Transitions Observed during Controlled Supercontraction Reveal Mechanisms in Spider Silk , 2004 .

[56]  Todd A Blackledge,et al.  Silken toolkits: biomechanics of silk fibers spun by the orb web spider Argiope argentata (Fabricius 1775) , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[57]  M. Denny,et al.  The structure and properties of spider silk , 1986 .

[58]  B. Meier,et al.  The molecular structure of spider dragline silk: Folding and orientation of the protein backbone , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Molecular Orientation and Two-Component Nature of the Crystalline Fraction of Spider Dragline Silk , 2007 .