Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND Patients with melanoma that progresses on ipilimumab and, if BRAF(V600) mutant-positive, a BRAF or MEK inhibitor or both, have few treatment options. We assessed the efficacy and safety of two pembrolizumab doses versus investigator-choice chemotherapy in patients with ipilimumab-refractory melanoma. METHODS We carried out a randomised phase 2 trial of patients aged 18 years or older from 73 hospitals, clinics, and academic medical centres in 12 countries who had confirmed progressive disease within 24 weeks after two or more ipilimumab doses and, if BRAF(V600) mutant-positive, previous treatment with a BRAF or MEK inhibitor or both. Patients had to have resolution of all ipilimumab-related adverse events to grade 0-1 and prednisone 10 mg/day or less for at least 2 weeks, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and at least one measurable lesion to be eligible. Using a centralised interactive voice response system, we randomly assigned (1:1:1) patients in a block size of six to receive intravenous pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks or investigator-choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus carboplatin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, dacarbazine, or oral temozolomide). Randomisation was stratified by ECOG performance status, lactate dehydrogenase concentration, and BRAF(V600) mutation status. Individual treatment assignment between pembrolizumab and chemotherapy was open label, but investigators and patients were masked to assignment of the dose of pembrolizumab. We present the primary endpoint at the prespecified second interim analysis of progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01704287. The study is closed to enrolment but continues to follow up and treat patients. FINDINGS Between Nov 30, 2012, and Nov 13, 2013, we enrolled 540 patients: 180 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg, 181 to receive pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg, and 179 to receive chemotherapy. Based on 410 progression-free survival events, progression-free survival was improved in patients assigned to pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg (HR 0·57, 95% CI 0·45-0·73; p<0·0001) and those assigned to pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg (0·50, 0·39-0·64; p<0·0001) compared with those assigned to chemotherapy. 6-month progression-free survival was 34% (95% CI 27-41) in the pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg group, 38% (31-45) in the 10 mg/kg group, and 16% (10-22) in the chemotherapy group. Treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 20 (11%) patients in the pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg group, 25 (14%) in the pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg group, and 45 (26%) in the chemotherapy group. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse event in the pembrolizumab groups was fatigue (two [1%] of 178 patients in the 2 mg/kg group and one [<1%] of 179 patients in the 10 mg/kg group, compared with eight [5%] of 171 in the chemotherapy group). Other treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events include generalised oedema and myalgia (each in two [1%] patients) in those given pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg; hypopituitarism, colitis, diarrhoea, decreased appetite, hyponatremia, and pneumonitis (each in two [1%]) in those given pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg; and anaemia (nine [5%]), fatigue (eight [5%]), neutropenia (six [4%]), and leucopenia (six [4%]) in those assigned to chemotherapy. INTERPRETATION These findings establish pembrolizumab as a new standard of care for the treatment of ipilimumab-refractory melanoma. FUNDING Merck Sharp & Dohme.

[1]  Axel Hoos,et al.  Guidelines for the Evaluation of Immune Therapy Activity in Solid Tumors: Immune-Related Response Criteria , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[2]  Axel Hoos,et al.  Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  T. Okazaki,et al.  PD-1 and PD-1 ligands: from discovery to clinical application. , 2007, International immunology.

[4]  Drew M. Pardoll,et al.  The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[5]  Antoni Ribas,et al.  Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[6]  R. Emerson,et al.  PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance , 2014, Nature.

[7]  Ryan Emerson,et al.  CTLA4 Blockade Broadens the Peripheral T-Cell Receptor Repertoire , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  R. Emerson,et al.  Distinct immunological mechanisms of CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade revealed by analyzing TCR usage in blood lymphocytes , 2014, Oncoimmunology.

[9]  J. Larkin,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  C. Drake,et al.  Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  A. Ribas,et al.  CTLA4 Blockade Induces Frequent Tumor Infiltration by Activated Lymphocytes Regardless of Clinical Responses in Humans , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  David C. Smith,et al.  Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Jason B. Williams,et al.  Up-Regulation of PD-L1, IDO, and Tregs in the Melanoma Tumor Microenvironment Is Driven by CD8+ T Cells , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[14]  Michael Hölzel,et al.  Immune cell-poor melanomas benefit from PD-1 blockade after targeted type I IFN activation. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[15]  T. Honjo,et al.  PD-L 1 / B 7 H-1 Inhibits the Effector Phase of Tumor Rejection by T Cell Receptor ( TCR ) Transgenic CD 8 T Cells , 2004 .

[16]  P. Hegde,et al.  MPDL3280A (anti-PD-L1) treatment leads to clinical activity in metastatic bladder cancer , 2014, Nature.

[17]  B. Efron The Efficiency of Cox's Likelihood Function for Censored Data , 1977 .

[18]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  H. Kohrt,et al.  Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients , 2014, Nature.

[20]  Tasuku Honjo,et al.  PD-L1/B7H-1 Inhibits the Effector Phase of Tumor Rejection by T Cell Receptor (TCR) Transgenic CD8+ T Cells , 2004, Cancer Research.

[21]  Y. Hochberg A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .

[22]  Antoni Ribas,et al.  Improved Survival with T Cell Clonotype Stability After Anti–CTLA-4 Treatment in Cancer Patients , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[23]  S. H. van der Burg,et al.  Anti–CTLA-4 therapy broadens the melanoma-reactive CD8+ T cell response , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[24]  Alessandro Testori,et al.  The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma , 2012, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[25]  Antoni Ribas,et al.  Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in melanoma. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  A. Ribas,et al.  Targeting oncogenic drivers and the immune system in melanoma. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  M Nurminen,et al.  Comparative analysis of two rates. , 1985, Statistics in medicine.

[28]  Yoshiaki Uyama,et al.  Moving beyond the hazard ratio in quantifying the between-group difference in survival analysis. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  David A. Schoenfeld,et al.  Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model , 1982 .

[30]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  G. Linette,et al.  Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.