Two-Dimensional Structure of Team Process Improvement: Team Reflection and Team Adaptation

Work group literature has recently focused on team process improvement, which refers to a learning process within the team, including the review of recent work methods and objectives and the development of alternative working strategies. Until now, however, no systematic empirical effort has been undertaken to empirically explore the dimensionality of team process improvement, although a dual focus, namely, team reflection and team adaptation, is theoretically accepted. The authors thus examined a two-dimensional structure of team process improvement by distinguishing team reflection and team adaptation in two studies using an experimental and a field design. Confirmatory factor analyses results of both studies provide evidence for the hypothesized two-dimensional structure of team process improvement. Additionally, the field study of organizational teams show that team reflection and team adaptation predict team performance to some extent.

[1]  Mary E. Graham,et al.  Consideration of the Incomplete Block Design for Policy-Capturing Research , 2001 .

[2]  M. West Reflexivity and work group effectiveness:a conceptual integration , 1996 .

[3]  D. Kaplan Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions , 2000 .

[4]  Kevin C. Stagl,et al.  Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures? , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  R. Loo A caveat on using single‐item versus multiple‐item scales , 2002 .

[7]  R. Kline Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[8]  Michael A. West,et al.  Reflexivity, revolution and innovation in work teams , 2000 .

[9]  M. Daudelin Learning from experience through reflection , 1996 .

[10]  A. Edmondson,et al.  6 Three Perspectives on Team Learning: Outcome Improvement, Task Mastery, and Group Process , 2007 .

[11]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group learning in organizations. , 2001 .

[12]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Explicit versus implicit coordination mechanisms and task dependencies: One size does not fit all. , 2004 .

[13]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[14]  Carsten K. W. De Dreu,et al.  Team innovation and team effectiveness: The importance of minority dissent and reflexivity , 2002 .

[15]  Melissa Woodard Barringer,et al.  A Review and Analysis of the Policy-Capturing Methodology in Organizational Research: Guidelines for Research and Practice , 2002 .

[16]  C. Savelsbergh,et al.  The Development and Empirical Validation of a Multidimensional Measurement Instrument for Team Learning Behaviors , 2009 .

[17]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Reflexivity for Team Innovation in China , 2004 .

[18]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[19]  Michael A. West,et al.  Reflexivity, Effectiveness, and Mental Health in BBC-TV Production Teams , 1998 .

[20]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  A META‐ANALYSIS OF TEAMWORK PROCESSES: TESTS OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH TEAM EFFECTIVENESS CRITERIA , 2008 .

[21]  Kyle Lewis Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[23]  R. Tindale,et al.  Team Reflexivity, Development of Shared Task Representations, and the Use of Distributed Information in Group Decision Making , 2009 .

[24]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[25]  K. Sutcliffe,et al.  Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research , 2005 .

[27]  Artemis Chang,et al.  A Multidimensional Approach to the Group Cohesion-Group Performance Relationship , 2001 .

[28]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[29]  Alan Mumford,et al.  Learning in action , 1995 .

[30]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations , 2003 .

[31]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  Single-Item Reliability: A Replication and Extension , 2001 .

[32]  F. Tschan,et al.  Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models , 2007 .

[33]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[34]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[35]  J. Edwards Multidimensional Constructs in Organizational Behavior Research: An Integrative Analytical Framework , 2001 .

[36]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[37]  Stephen M. Fiore,et al.  Virtual Teams as Sociotechnical Systems , 2005, Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology.

[38]  Lynda Aiman-Smith,et al.  Conducting Studies of Decision Making in Organizational Contexts: A Tutorial for Policy-Capturing and Other Regression-Based Techniques , 2002 .

[39]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[40]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[41]  Deanne N. Den Hartog,et al.  Diversity and team outcomes: the moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity , 2003 .

[42]  P. Bliese Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[43]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[45]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  Are You Attracted? Do You Intend to Pursue? A Recruiting Policy-Capturing Study , 2001 .

[46]  T. Ellwart,et al.  Wissensverteilung und Wissenskoordination in Gruppen , 2007 .

[47]  J. A. Lepine,et al.  Team adaptation and postchange performance: effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  Mark W. Johnston,et al.  Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework , 1990 .

[49]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[50]  P. Koopman,et al.  Reflexivity in Teams: A Measure and Correlates , 2005 .

[51]  A. Homan,et al.  Turning the Team Around: The Importance of Team Reflexivity Following Poor Performance , 2009 .