Reprint of: Policy decisions on endocrine disruptors should be based on science across disciplines: A response to Dietrich et al.
暂无分享,去创建一个
D. Carpenter | P. Sawchenko | J. Balthazart | P. Czernichow | H. Vaudry | G. Prins | J. Romijn | R. Nelson | P. Sly | A. Gore | M. Tena-Sempere | D. Crews | A. Hollenberg | R. Millar | C. Watson | R. Dores | L. Wartofsky | E. Rissman | E. Ridgway | P. R. Hof | A. V. Lee | D. M. Power | D. Bikle | E. Diamanti-Kandarakis | D. Grattan | C. Lange | J. E. Levine | M. Porta | M. Poth | O. Söder | H. Taylor | K. Wallen | Z. Wang | A. V. Lee
[1] G. B. Gori,et al. Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles. , 2013, Chemico-biological interactions.
[2] Laura N. Vandenberg,et al. Science and policy on endocrine disrupters must not be mixed: a reply to a “common sense” intervention by toxicology journal editors , 2013, Environmental Health.
[3] P. Grandjean,et al. Transparency and translation of science in a modern world , 2013, Environmental Health.
[4] Laura N. Vandenberg,et al. Regulatory decisions on endocrine disrupting chemicals should be based on the principles of endocrinology. , 2013, Reproductive toxicology.
[5] Julie E Goodman,et al. Low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose-responses of endocrine disrupting chemicals: has the case been made? , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[6] T J Woodruff,et al. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and public health protection: a statement of principles from The Endocrine Society. , 2012, Endocrinology.
[7] L. Giudice,et al. State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals - 2012 , 2012 .
[8] Laura N. Vandenberg,et al. Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses. , 2012, Endocrine reviews.
[9] L. Birnbaum. Environmental Chemicals: Evaluating Low-Dose Effects , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.
[10] L S McCarty,et al. The human relevant potency threshold: reducing uncertainty by human calibration of cumulative risk assessments. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[11] A. Piersma,et al. Reproductive toxicants have a threshold of adversity , 2011, Critical reviews in toxicology.
[12] P. Christiansen,et al. A defense of the primitive cheetah skull. , 2011, Science.
[13] Melvin E Andersen,et al. Linear low-dose extrapolation for noncancer health effects is the exception, not the rule , 2011, Critical reviews in toxicology.
[14] R. Preston,et al. Application of Key Events Analysis to Chemical Carcinogens and Noncarcinogens , 2009, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.
[15] L. Giudice,et al. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. , 2009, Endocrine reviews.
[16] K. Wallen. The Organizational Hypothesis: Reflections on the 50th anniversary of the publication of Phoenix, Goy, Gerall, and Young (1959) , 2009, Hormones and Behavior.
[17] Kristina A Thayer,et al. Large effects from small exposures. I. Mechanisms for endocrine-disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.
[18] D. Gaylor,et al. No threshold dose for estradiol-induced sex reversal of turtle embryos: how little is too much? , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.
[19] W. C. Young,et al. Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues mediating mating behavior in the female guinea pig. , 1959, Endocrinology.
[20] D. Sheehan. No-threshold dose-response curves for nongenotoxic chemicals: findings and applications for risk assessment. , 2006, Environmental research.