Modeling Scientific Communication with Multimodal Writing Tasks: Impact on Students at Different Grade Levels

One emerging area of science education research deals with the use of multimodal writing tasks to help improve student conceptual understanding. In these tasks, students are asked to utilize non-text modes along with text to discuss concepts dealt with in classroom activities. Previous research has indicated that these tasks benefit student conceptual development most when students are effective at integrating all modes together within one piece of communication. Lessons specifically designed to improve ability to integrate or embed modes have been shown to help students develop this skill, however the impact of these lessons has not been systematically tested at different grade levels. In this study, Cognitive Load Theory provided a framework for evaluation of the lesson and its impact on student writing and conceptual development. Students in pre-existing science classrooms in grades 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11 were randomly assigned to treatment groups in which an “Embeddedness Encouraging Lesson” (EEL) was taught and were compared to control groups that did not receive the lesson. Student multimodal writing products were assessed for embeddedness strategy use and student writing scores were correlated to overall test performance. Results indicate that the current pedagogical progression associated with multimodal writing tasks may be most beneficial for students at middle grade levels.

[1]  Tina Seufert Supporting Coherence Formation in Learning from Multiple Representations , 2003 .

[2]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[3]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[4]  J. Sweller Implications of Cognitive Load Theory for Multimedia Learning , 2005, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[5]  Murat Günel,et al.  The Impact of Using Multi Modal Representations within Writing to Learn Activities on Learning Electricity Unit at 6th Grade , 2009 .

[6]  Brian Hand,et al.  Comparing student understanding of quantum physics when embedding multimodal representations into two different writing formats: Presentation format versus summary report format , 2006 .

[7]  Paul Chandler,et al.  Levels of Expertise and Instructional Design , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Ursula Klein,et al.  Tools and modes of representation in the laboratory sciences , 2001 .

[10]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[11]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[12]  W. Thalheimer,et al.  How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology , 2002 .

[13]  Mark Andrew McDermott,et al.  The impact of embedding multiple modes of representation on student construction of chemistry knowledge , 2009 .

[14]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[15]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Learning from Writing in Secondary Science: Some theoretical and practical implications , 2006 .

[16]  Brian Hand,et al.  The impact of embedding multiple modes of representation within writing tasks on high school students’ chemistry understanding , 2013 .

[17]  D. Alvermann Multiliteracies and Self-Questioning in the Service of Science Learning , 2004 .

[18]  J. Emig Writing as a Mode of Learning. , 1977 .

[19]  L. R. Peterson,et al.  Short-term retention of individual verbal items. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Patricia Snyder,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from Correlational Research for Evidence-Based Practice , 2005 .

[21]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Using Multi-Modal Representations to Improve Learning in Junior Secondary Science , 2010 .

[22]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect , 2003 .

[23]  Perry D. Klein,et al.  The Challenges of Scientific Literacy: From the viewpoint of second‐generation cognitive science , 2006 .

[24]  Brian Hand,et al.  A secondary reanalysis of student perceptions of non‐traditional writing tasks over a ten year period , 2009 .

[25]  G. Dorffner The Connectionist Route to Embodiment and Dynamicism , 1999 .

[26]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Writing for learning in secondary science: Rethinking practices , 1996 .

[27]  W. Schnotz,et al.  A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load Theory , 2007 .

[28]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? , 1997 .