How the input shapes the acquisition of verb morphology: Elicited production and computational modelling in two highly inflected languages
暂无分享,去创建一个
Anna L. Theakston | J. Pine | E. Lieven | Felix Engelmann | S. Granlund | Joanna Kołak | Marta Szreder | Ben Ambridge
[1] James L. McClelland,et al. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains , 2020, Connectionist psychology: A text with readings.
[2] Anna L. Theakston,et al. Language-general and language-specific phenomena in the acquisition of inflectional noun morphology: A cross-linguistic elicited-production study of Polish, Finnish and Estonian , 2019, Journal of Memory and Language.
[3] Jennifer Hay,et al. Sociophonetics: The Role of Words, the Role of Context, and the Role of Words in Context , 2018, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[4] B. Ambridge,et al. Children's Acquisition of the English Past‐Tense: Evidence for a Single‐Route Account From Novel Verb Production Data , 2018, Cognitive science.
[5] B. Ambridge,et al. The roles of word-form frequency and phonological neighbourhood density in the acquisition of Lithuanian noun morphology , 2017, Journal of Child Language.
[6] B. Ambridge,et al. Disentangling Effects of Input Frequency and Morphophonological Complexity on Children's Acquisition of Verb Inflection: An Elicited Production Study of Japanese , 2017, Cognitive science.
[7] Magdalena Smoczynska,et al. The Acquisition of Polish , 2017 .
[8] Julian M. Pine,et al. An Elicited-Production Study of Inflectional Verb Morphology in Child Finnish , 2016, Cogn. Sci..
[9] E. Lieven,et al. How do language-specific characteristics affect the acquisition of different relative clause types? Evidence from Finnish* , 2016, Journal of Child Language.
[10] J. Gabry,et al. Bayesian Applied Regression Modeling via Stan , 2016 .
[11] Shravan Vasishth,et al. Statistical Methods for Linguistic Research: Foundational Ideas - Part I , 2016, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[12] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[13] Timothy O'Donnell,et al. Productivity and Reuse in Language: A Theory of Linguistic Computation and Storage , 2015 .
[14] Shravan Vasishth,et al. Bayesian linear mixed models using Stan: A tutorial for psychologists, linguists, and cognitive scientists , 2015, 1506.06201.
[15] J. Pine,et al. Comparing Different Models of the Development of Verb Inflection in Early Child Spanish , 2015, PloS one.
[16] Anna L. Theakston,et al. The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition , 2015, Journal of Child Language.
[17] James L. McClelland,et al. Parallel Distributed Processing at 25: Further Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition , 2014, Cogn. Sci..
[18] D. Bates,et al. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.
[19] D. Barr,et al. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.
[20] Evan Kidd,et al. The effect of frequency and phonological neighbourhood density on the acquisition of past tense verbs by Finnish children , 2012 .
[21] Gert Westermann,et al. A neuroconstructivist model of past tense development and processing. , 2012, Psychological review.
[22] Anna L. Theakston,et al. Productivity of a Polish child’s inflectional noun morphology: a naturalistic study , 2012 .
[23] Balthasar Bickel,et al. Nouns and verbs in Chintang: children's usage and surrounding adult speech* , 2011, Journal of Child Language.
[24] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Rules Versus Statistics: Insights From a Highly Inflected Language , 2011, Cognitive Sciences.
[25] L. Leonard,et al. Children with specific language impairment in Finnish: the use of tense and agreement inflections. , 2011, Journal of child language.
[26] B. Ambridge,et al. Children's judgments of regular and irregular novel past-tense forms: new data on the English past-tense debate. , 2010, Developmental psychology.
[27] Anna L. Theakston,et al. The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: a longitudinal elicitation study. Part 1: auxiliary BE. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[28] Anna L. Theakston,et al. The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: a longitudinal elicitation study. Part 2: the modals and auxiliary DO. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[29] U. Stephany,et al. Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective , 2009 .
[30] C. Pléh,et al. The use of tense and agreement by Hungarian-speaking children with language impairment. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[31] R. Baayen,et al. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .
[32] H. Clahsen,et al. The perfective past tense in Greek child language* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.
[33] Michael Tomasello,et al. Rapid learning of an abstract language-specific category: Polish children's acquisition of the instrumental construction , 2008, Journal of Child Language.
[34] E. Dąbrowska. The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: an empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology , 2008 .
[35] Justin N. Wood,et al. Evidence for a non-linguistic distinction between singular and plural sets in rhesus monkeys , 2008, Cognition.
[36] Charles D. Yang,et al. Morphosyntactic Learning and the Development of Tense , 2007 .
[37] Anna L. Theakston,et al. Errors of Omission in English-Speaking Children's Production of Plurals and the Past Tense: The Effects of Frequency, Phonology, and Competition , 2006, Cogn. Sci..
[38] E. Dąbrowska,et al. Polish children's productivity with case marking: the role of regularity, type frequency, and phonological diversity , 2006, Journal of Child Language.
[39] K. Plunkett,et al. Stochastic approaches to understanding dissociations in inflectional morphology , 2006, Brain and Language.
[40] N. Hyams,et al. The morphosyntax of mood in early grammar with special reference to Swahili , 2006 .
[41] Ewa Dabrowska,et al. Productivity and beyond: mastering the Polish genitive inflection , 2005, Journal of Child Language.
[42] Anna L. Theakston,et al. The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: BE and HAVE , 2005 .
[43] Anna L. Theakston,et al. A dense corpus study of past tense and plural overregularization in English. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[44] Ewa Dąbrowska,et al. Rules or schemas? Evidence from Polish , 2004 .
[45] B. Hayes,et al. Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study , 2003, Cognition.
[46] Anna L. Theakston,et al. The role of the input in the acquisition of third person singular verbs in English. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[47] Dagmar Bittner,et al. Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition : a cross-linguistic perspective , 2003 .
[48] S. Pinker,et al. The past and future of the past tense , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[49] James L. McClelland,et al. Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[50] M. C. Caselli,et al. Italian children's use of verb and noun morphology during the preschool years* , 2002 .
[51] Ping Li,et al. PatPho: A phonological pattern generator for neural networks , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[52] R. Bertram,et al. The role of derivational morphology in vocabulary acquisition: get by with a little help from my morpheme friends. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of psychology.
[53] U. Hahn,et al. German Inflection: Single Route or Dual Route? , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.
[54] 充秋 板東,et al. 失語とshort-term memory , 1999 .
[55] Patrick Juola,et al. A connectionist model of english past tense and plural morphology , 1999, Cogn. Sci..
[56] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[57] V. Marchman,et al. Morphological productivity in children with normal language and SLI: a study of the English past tense. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[58] Nina Hyams,et al. Aspects of root infinitives , 1998 .
[59] K. Wexler. Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage , 1998 .
[60] Steven Pinker,et al. Words and rules , 1998 .
[61] J. Pine,et al. Subject–verb agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: what low error rates hide , 1998, Journal of Child Language.
[62] G. Gallup. Self-awareness and the evolution of social intelligence , 1998, Behavioural Processes.
[63] Kim Plunkett,et al. A Connectionist Model of the Arabic Plural System , 1997 .
[64] V. Marchman,et al. Learning from a connectionist model of the acquisition of the English past tense , 1996, Cognition.
[65] Mark H. Johnson,et al. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development , 1996 .
[66] K. Wexler,et al. The Optional-Infinitive Stage in Child English , 1996 .
[67] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Default Generalisation in Connectionist Networks. , 1995 .
[68] Joan L. Bybee,et al. Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .
[69] M. MacDonald,et al. Individual Differences and Probabilistic Constraints in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1995 .
[70] J. Elman,et al. Learning and morphological change , 1995, Cognition.
[71] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Beyond Rules and Exceptions: A Connectionist Approach to Inflectional Morphology , 1994 .
[72] M K Tanenhaus,et al. A constraint-based lexicalist account of the subject/object attachment preference , 1994, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[73] V. Marchman,et al. From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets , 1993, Cognition.
[74] Steven Pinker,et al. Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns , 1993 .
[75] G. Marcus,et al. Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals , 1992, Cognition.
[76] B. MacWhinney,et al. Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model , 1991, Cognition.
[77] V. Marchman,et al. U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition , 1991, Cognition.
[78] K. Bock,et al. Broken agreement , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[79] James L. McClelland,et al. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.
[80] James L. McClelland,et al. James L. McClelland, David Rumelhart and the PDP Research Group, Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition . Vol. 1. Foundations . Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models . Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press, 1987. , 1989, Journal of Child Language.
[81] S. Pinker,et al. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition , 1988, Cognition.
[82] James L. McClelland,et al. Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. , 1987 .
[83] D. Slobin. The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition , 1987 .
[84] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.
[85] James L. McClelland,et al. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .
[86] Mark S. Seidenberg. The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems , 1985, Cognition.
[87] Steven Pinker,et al. Language learnability and language development , 1985 .
[88] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria , 1985, Memory & cognition.
[89] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition , 1984 .
[90] Carol Lynn Moder,et al. Morphological Classes as Natural Categories , 1983 .
[91] D. Slobin,et al. Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections , 1982, Cognition.
[92] S. Andrews. Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? , 1982 .
[93] Dan I. Slobin,et al. Early Grammatical Development in Several Languages, with Special Attention to Soviet Research. , 1968 .
[94] Murdock,et al. The serial position effect of free recall , 1962 .
[95] J. Berko. The Child's Learning of English Morphology , 1958 .
[96] David,et al. IA On Learning the Past Tenses of English Verbs , 2021 .
[97] Charles Yang,et al. Testing the Tolerance Principle: Children form productive rules when it is more computationally efficient to do so , 2016, CogSci.
[98] R. Mccall,et al. The Genetic and Environmental Origins of Learning Abilities and Disabilities in the Early School , 2007, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.
[99] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[100] S. Chandler. The English past tense: Analogy redux , 2010 .
[101] Robert Forkel,et al. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online , 2009 .
[102] Ewa Dabrowska,et al. The later development of an early-emerging system: the curious case of the Polish genitive , 2008 .
[103] Gert Westermann,et al. A single-mechanism dual-route model of German verb inflection , 2008 .
[104] Joshua K. Hartshorne,et al. Why girls say 'holded' more than boys. , 2006, Developmental science.
[105] E. Pothos. The rules versus similarity distinction. , 2005, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[106] Elżbieta Sobol,et al. Słownik języka polskiego PWN , 2005 .
[107] J. Pine. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition , 2005 .
[108] José Javier Aguado-Orea,et al. The acquisition of morpho-syntax in Spanish : implications for current theories of development , 2004 .
[109] Auli Hakulinen. Iso suomen kielioppi , 2004 .
[110] M. Tomasello. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2003 .
[111] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Reassessing working memory: comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). , 2002, Psychological review.
[112] G. Marcus. The Algebraic Mind: Integrating Connectionism and Cognitive Science , 2001 .
[113] D. Wilton. How Many Words Are There In The English Language? Wilton''s Word and Phrase Origins , 2001 .
[114] Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .
[115] Charles D. Yang,et al. Knowledge and learning in natural language , 2000 .
[116] P. Gordon,et al. Frequency Effects and the Representational Status of Regular Inflections , 1999 .
[117] Virginia A. Marchman,et al. Children's Productivity in the English Past Tense: The Role of Frequency, Phonology, and Neighborhood Structure , 1997, Cogn. Sci..
[118] James L. McClelland,et al. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.
[119] Garrison W. Cottrell,et al. Acquiring the Mapping from Meaning to Sounds , 1994, Connect. Sci..
[120] Chris Sinha,et al. Symbol Grounding or the Emergence of Symbols? Vocabulary Growth in Children and a Connectionist Net , 1992 .
[121] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Rules or connections? The past tense revisited , 1992 .
[122] Joan L. Bybee. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form , 1985 .
[123] Aila Mielikäinen. Monikon 3. persoonan kongruenssista puhekielessä , 1984 .
[124] Charles W. Kisseberth,et al. Generative Phonology: Description and Theory , 1979 .
[125] B. MacWhinney. The Acquisition Of Morphophonology , 1978 .
[126] Z. Saloni. Cechy składniowe polskiego czasownika , 1976 .
[127] Chris L. S. Coryn,et al. Short-term memory , 1975 .
[128] D. Slobin. Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar , 1973 .
[129] Noam Chomsky,et al. The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .
[130] Jan Tokarski,et al. Czasowniki polskie : formy, typy, wyjątki : słownik , 1951 .
[131] James L. McClelland,et al. Scholarship@Western Scholarship@Western , 2022 .