New didactics for university instruction: why and how?

Why should instructors in traditional higher education institutions consider the re-design of their courses? The paper begins with a defense of four compelling reasons for changes in didactics: a review of some key principles of good teaching and learning, the increasing diversity of student characteristics and associated needs, the strategic and educational rationales for five types of flexibility increase in our current courses, and the particular need for instructors in faculties of education to provide leadership and models. Given the why, the next question is how? The remainder of the paper discusses the how in terms of a conceptually grounded approach to the pedagogical re-engineering of existing courses so that they become more flexible, with more student engagement, more-targetted communication, and more-attuned instructor scaffolding of increased student responsibility for his or her own learning. These concepts are made concrete through the extension of six standard sets of course-related tasks into redesigned sets involving the new didactics and WWW-based course-support functionalities. Examples from current practice at the Faculty of Educational Science and Technology at the University of Twente are used to illustrate the new didactical categories and their use of WWW-based course environments. The paper concludes with a consideration of key challenges that will confront the implementation of such new didactics in practice.

[1]  Jef Moonen,et al.  How to do more with less? , 1994, Interactive Multimedia in University Education.

[2]  Nigel Norman Communication technologies and education: Lessons in the potential of innovation , 1997 .

[3]  Betty Collis Pedagogical Reengineering: A Pedagogical Approach to Course Enrichment and Redesign with the World Wide Web. , 1997 .

[4]  Betty Collis,et al.  Tele-Learning in a Digital World: The Future of Distance Learning , 1996 .

[5]  Bridget Somekh,et al.  Towards a pedagogy for information technology , 1991 .

[6]  Mary E. Huba,et al.  Factors Related to Teachers’ Adoption of a Two-Way Interactive Distance Education Technology , 1997 .

[7]  Betty Collis Implementing Innovative Teaching Across the Faculty via the WWW , 1998 .

[8]  John T. Stasko,et al.  An apprenticeship-based multimedia courseware for computer graphics studies provided on the World Wide Web , 1997, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Betty Collis Pedagogical re-engineering: A new approach to course enrichment and re-design with the WWW , 1997 .

[10]  Betty Collis,et al.  Design guidelines for WWW-based course environments , 1996 .

[11]  Shelley B. Wepner,et al.  What Should We Know About Technology-Based Projects for Tenure and Promotion? , 1997 .

[12]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Integrating Lectures and Electronic Course Materials , 1997 .

[13]  Nigel Wright,et al.  Rethinking Video‐conferencing: Lessons Learned from Initial Teacher Education , 1996 .

[14]  Betty Collis,et al.  Flexibility as a Key Construct in European Training: Experiences from the TeleScopia Project , 1997, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[15]  Michael R. Taber,et al.  Use of the Web as a tool for interactive learning , 1996, WebNet.

[16]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Characteristics of online teaching in post-secondary, formal education , 1997 .

[17]  Pamela T. Northrup,et al.  Faculty Perceptions of Distance Education: Factors Influencing Utilization , 1997 .

[18]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology , 1993 .

[19]  Betty Collis,et al.  Learning to learn in a WWW-based environment , 1999 .

[20]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .