Bounded Budget Betweenness Centrality Game for Strategic Network Formations

In this paper, we introduce the bounded budget betweenness centrality game, a strategic network formation game in which nodes build connections subject to a budget constraint in order to maximize their betweenness centrality, a metric introduced in the social network analysis to measure the information flow through a node. To reflect real world scenarios where short paths are more important in information exchange, we generalize the betweenness definition to only consider shortest paths of length at most `. We present both complexity and constructive existence results about Nash equilibria of the game. For the nonuniform version of the game where node budgets, link costs, and pairwise communication weights may vary, we show that Nash equilibria may not exist and it is NP-hard to decide whether Nash equilibria exist in a game instance. For the uniform version of the game where link costs and pairwise communication weights are one and each node can build k links, we construct two families of Nash equilibria based on shift graphs, and study the properties of Nash equilibria. Moreover, we study the complexity of computing best responses and show that the task is polynomial for uniform 2-BC games and NP-hard for other games.

[1]  Berno Buechel,et al.  Network formation with closeness incentives , 2009 .

[2]  R. Burt Secondhand Brokerage: Evidence On The Importance Of Local Structure For Managers, Bankers, And Analysts , 2007 .

[3]  Y. Mansour,et al.  On Nash Equilibria for a Network Creation Game , 2006, TEAC.

[4]  Wei Chen,et al.  Bounded budget betweenness centrality game for strategic network formations , 2011, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[5]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Strategic network formation with structural holes , 2008, EC '08.

[6]  M. Newman,et al.  Why social networks are different from other types of networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  B. Cohen,et al.  Incentives Build Robustness in Bit-Torrent , 2003 .

[8]  Stefan Schmid,et al.  On the topologies formed by selfish peers , 2006, PODC '06.

[9]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Time-Critical Social Mobilization , 2010, Science.

[10]  Rajmohan Rajaraman,et al.  Bounded budget connection (BBC) games or how to make friends and influence people, on a budget , 2008, PODC '08.

[11]  A. van de Rijt,et al.  Dynamics of Networks if Everyone Strives for Structural Holes1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[13]  Sanjeev Goyal,et al.  Structural holes in social networks , 2007, J. Econ. Theory.

[14]  M. Jackson,et al.  A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks , 1996 .

[15]  Scott Shenker,et al.  On a network creation game , 2003, PODC '03.

[16]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[17]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Algorithms, Games, and the Internet , 2001, ICALP.

[18]  Daniel Stutzbach,et al.  Characterizing Unstructured Overlay Topologies in Modern P2P File-Sharing Systems , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[19]  Robin I. M. Dunbar Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates , 1992 .

[20]  David C. Parkes,et al.  The price of selfish behavior in bilateral network formation , 2005, PODC '05.