Frequency/time domain modeling of a direct drive point absorber wave energy converter

Two different methods to model a point absorber wave energy converter (WEC) with direct drive linear power take-off (PTO) are proposed in the present study: the frequency domain (FD) method and the time domain (TD) method. In the FD analysis, the frequency response function (FRF) of the WEC device is obtained via the equation of motion, and the expressions of power capture width in regular and random waves are derived as well. In the TD modeling, based on a state space approximation of the convolution term in the motion equation, both regular wave and random wave simulations are carried out. The regular wave simulation results indicate that the state space approximation is sufficiently accurate and the capture width reaches the maximum in the vicinity of the natural frequency. In the random wave simulations, the effects of buoy size, the PTO damping and wave climate on the power capture width are discussed in detail, which leads to the conclusion that the capture widths are influenced by the natural frequency of the WEC device, peak frequency of the wave spectrum, the amplitude of FRF and PTO damping. Furthermore, the increase of the capture width is at the cost of a relatively large buoy size and PTO damping when control is not included.

[1]  Paulo Alexandre Justino,et al.  Optimization of Mooring Configuration Parameters of Floating Wave Energy Converters , 2011 .

[2]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of non-predictive phase-control strategies for a point-absorbing wave energy converter , 2009 .

[3]  Mats Leijon,et al.  Hydrodynamic modelling of a direct drive wave energy converter , 2005 .

[4]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Analysis of a Two-Body Floating Wave Energy Converter With Particular Focus on the Effects of Power Take Off and Mooring Systems on Energy Capture , 2011 .

[5]  J. Falnes Ocean Waves and Oscillating Systems , 2002 .

[6]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Analysis of a two-body floating wave energy converter with particular focus on the effect of mooring system on energy capture , 2011 .

[7]  A. R. Wallace,et al.  On the capture width of wave energy converters , 2009 .

[8]  Ronald W. Yeung,et al.  DESIGN, ANALYSIS, AND EVALUATION OF THE UC-BERKELEY WAVE-ENERGY EXTRACTOR , 2012 .

[9]  C. Sanathanan,et al.  Transfer function synthesis as a ratio of two complex polynomials , 1963 .

[10]  J. N. Newman,et al.  Computation Of Wave Effects Using ThePanel Method , 2005 .

[11]  Joao Cruz,et al.  Ocean Wave Energy: Current Status and Future Prespectives , 2008 .

[12]  K. R. Goheen,et al.  Time Domain Models from Frequency Domain Descriptions: Application to Marine Dynamics , 1992 .

[13]  António F.O. Falcão,et al.  Wave energy utilization: A review of the technologies , 2010 .

[14]  Joao Cruz,et al.  Ocean Wave Energy , 2008 .

[15]  W. E. Cummins,et al.  The Impulse Response Function and Ship Motion , 1962 .

[16]  J. Falnes,et al.  STATE-SPACE MODELLING OF A VERTICAL CYLINDER IN HEAVE , 1995 .

[17]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Hybrid frequency-time domain models for dynamic response analysis of marine structures , 2008 .

[18]  O. Egeland,et al.  State-space representation of radiation forces in time-domain vessel models , 2005 .

[19]  E. R. Jefferys Simulation of wave power devices , 1984 .

[20]  Robert Banasiak,et al.  Modelling of hydraulic performance and wave energy extraction by a point absorber in heave , 2004 .

[21]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2018, Fundamental Statistical Inference.

[22]  W. Cummins THE IMPULSE RESPONSE FUNCTION AND SHIP MOTIONS , 2010 .

[23]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Dynamics of A Force-Compensated Two-Body Wave Energy Converter in Heave with Hydraulic Power Take-Off Subject To Phase Control , 2007 .