Perfect Timing? Dominant Category, Dominant Design, and the Window of Opportunity for Firm Entry

Determining the optimal time for firms to enter emerging industries has long been a key concern in strategy, yet scholars still struggle to create a theoretical foundation that can fully integrate the empirical findings within this area. We incorporate categorical dynamics into the theory of the industry life cycle to complement and enhance the predictive power of the existing theories of entry timing. In addition, we introduce the concept of a dominant category — the conceptual schema that most stakeholders adhere to when referring to products that address similar needs and compete for the same market space — and link this concept to the emergence of the dominant technological design. From this framework, we develop a set of propositions that relate the emergence of the dominant category to entry-timing advantages and firm performance. In particular, we propose the existence of a window of opportunity (i.e., an optimal time for firm entry) that starts with the emergence of the dominant category and ends with the emergence of the dominant design. We discuss the implications of categorical dynamics for our understanding of entry-timing advantages and explore the influence of industry contexts in the emergence of the dominant category.

[1]  R. Schmalensee Product Differentiation Advantages of Pioneering Brands , 1980 .

[2]  S. Klepper Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[3]  Kent Nakamoto,et al.  Competitive Strategies for Late Entry into a Market with a Dominant Brand , 1990 .

[4]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Interaction of Design Hierarchies and market Concepts in Technological Evolution : Research Policy , 1985 .

[5]  Giacomo Negro,et al.  RESEARCH ON CATEGORIES IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF ORGANIZATIONS , 2010 .

[6]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Strategies for Survival in Fast-Changing Industries , 1998 .

[7]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  Market Rebels: How Activists Make or Break Radical Innovations , 2008 .

[8]  G. Carroll,et al.  Density Delay in the Evolution of Organizational Populations: A Model and Five Empirical Tests , 1989 .

[9]  Heather A. Haveman Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation , 1992 .

[10]  Kathryn L. Heinze,et al.  Forage for Thought: Mobilizing Codes in the Movement for Grass-fed Meat and Dairy Products , 2008 .

[11]  Constantinos C. Markides,et al.  Fast Second: How Smart Companies Bypass Radical Innovation to Enter and Dominate New Markets , 2005 .

[12]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view , 1998 .

[13]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  Category Reinterpretation and Defection: Modernism and Tradition in Italian Winemaking , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Joseph F. Porac,et al.  Categorization bases and their influence on product category knowledge structures , 2002 .

[15]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Thinking About Technology: Applying a Cognitive Lens to Technical Change , 2008 .

[16]  Peer C. Fiss,et al.  The Symbolic Management of Strategic Change: Sensegiving Via Framing and Decoupling , 2006 .

[17]  A. Dixit The Role Of Investment In Entry-Deterrence , 1980 .

[18]  Elizabeth G. Pontikes Fitting in or starting new? An analysis of invention, constraint, and the emergence of new categories in the software industry , 2008 .

[19]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[20]  M. Lounsbury Cultural Entrepreneurship: Stories, Legitimacy and the Acquisition of Resources , 2001 .

[21]  S. Barley Semiotics and the Study of Occupational and Organizational Cultures. , 1983 .

[22]  Barry L. Bayus,et al.  CREATING AND SURVIVING IN NEW INDUSTRIES , 2004 .

[23]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies , 2007 .

[24]  M. T. Kennedy,et al.  Getting Counted: Markets, Media, and Reality , 2008 .

[25]  William T. Robinson,et al.  Are market pioneers intrinsically stronger than later entrants , 1992 .

[26]  J. Porac,et al.  Sociocognitive Dynamics in a Product Market , 1999 .

[27]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[28]  J. Ivery,et al.  Organizational Ecology , 2007 .

[29]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[30]  W. Mitchell Dual clocks: Entry order influences on incumbent and newcomer market share and survival when specialized assets retain their value , 1991 .

[31]  Michael Lounsbury,et al.  Legitimating Nascent Collective Identities: Coordinating Cultural Entrepreneurship , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Services and the Business Models of Product Firms: An Empirical Analysis of the Software Industry , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Greta Hsu Jacks of All Trades and Masters of None: Audiences' Reactions to Spanning Genres in Feature Film Production , 2006 .

[34]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Technology, Identity, and Inertia through the Lens of 'The Digital Photography Company' , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[35]  I. MacMillan,et al.  Preemptive strategies. , 1983, The Journal of business strategy.

[36]  S. Klepper,et al.  Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations , 1982 .

[37]  Fernando F. Suarez,et al.  The Role of Environmental Dynamics in Building a First Mover Advantage Theory , 2007 .

[38]  Elizabeth G. Pontikes Two Sides of the Same Coin , 2012 .

[39]  G. Carroll,et al.  Logics of Organization Theory , 2012 .

[40]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Referring as a Collaborative Process , 2003 .

[41]  Eviatar Zerubavel,et al.  Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology , 1997 .

[42]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Constructing Markets and Shaping Boundaries: Entrepreneurial Power in Nascent Fields , 2009 .

[43]  Stanislav D. Dobrev,et al.  Legitimacy vacuum, structural imprinting, and the first mover disadvantage , 2010 .

[44]  What Does it Mean to Be Green? The Emergence of New Criteria for Assessing Corporate Reputation , 2012 .

[45]  M. Lambkin Order of entry and performance in new markets , 1988 .

[46]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[47]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Accounting for the Explanations of CEO Compensation: Substance and Symbolism , 1995 .

[48]  E. Prescott,et al.  Sequential location among firms with foresight , 1977 .

[49]  Stine Grodal,et al.  Hedging Your Bets: Explaining Executives' Market Labeling Strategies in Nanotechnology , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[50]  Chip Heath,et al.  Idea Habitats: How the Prevalence of Environmental Cues Influences the Success of Ideas , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[52]  Paul M. Hirsch,et al.  Social Movements, Field Frames, and Industry Emergence: A Cultural-Political Perspective , 2003 .

[53]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  Multiple Category Memberships in Markets: An Integrative Theory and Two Empirical Tests , 2009 .

[54]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[55]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms , 1995 .

[56]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation , 1994 .

[57]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Innovation, Competition, and Industry Structure , 1993 .

[58]  N. Nohria,et al.  Are leaders portable? , 2006, Harvard business review.

[59]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[60]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[61]  S. Wheelwright,et al.  The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution * , 2003 .

[62]  D. Newbery,et al.  Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .

[63]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[64]  R. V. Wyk Innovation: The attacker's advantage : Richard N. Foster 316 pages, £14.95 (London, Macmillan, 1986) , 1987 .

[65]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Robust Identities or Nonentities? Typecasting in the Feature‐Film Labor Market1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[66]  David M Levinson,et al.  First Mover Advantages , 2011 .

[67]  Nina Granqvist,et al.  EXECUTIVES ’ MARKET LABELING STRATEGIES IN NANOTECHNOLOGY , 2012 .

[68]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[69]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Focusing the Corporate Product: Securities Analysts and De-diversification , 2000 .

[70]  H. Thomas,et al.  Rivalry and the Industry Model of Scottish Knitwear Producers , 1995 .

[71]  P. Callero :Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology , 1999 .

[72]  M. Sarkar,et al.  The conditioning effect of time on firm survival: An industry life cycle approach , 2002 .

[73]  Peer C. Fiss,et al.  An Ontological Turn in Categories Research: From Standards of Legitimacy to Evidence of Actuality , 2013 .

[74]  Michael Gort,et al.  First Mover Advantage and the Speed of Competitive Entry, 1887-1986 , 1999 .

[75]  Debanjan Mitra,et al.  Deconstructing the Pioneer's Advantage: Examining Vintage Effects and Consumer Valuations of Quality and Variety , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[76]  Rikki Abzug,et al.  Institutionalizing Identity: Symbolic Isomorphism and Organizational Names , 2002 .

[77]  O. Sorenson Letting the market work for you: an evolutionary perspective on product strategy , 2000 .

[78]  Gwendolyn K. Lee Understanding the Timing of ‘Fast-Second’ Entry and the Relevance of Capabilities in Invention vs. Commercialization , 2008 .

[79]  Fernando F. Suarez Battles for Technological Dominance: An Integrative Framework , 2004 .

[80]  Raghu Garud,et al.  A Socio-Cognitive Model of Technology Evolution: The Case of Cochlear Implants , 2015 .

[81]  Edwin R. Otto Innovation: The Attacker's Advantage , 1986 .

[82]  P. Jennings,et al.  Hybrid Vigor: Securing Venture Capital by Spanning Categories in Nanotechnology , 2013 .

[83]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Firm Survival and the Evolution of Oligopoly , 2002 .

[84]  Christopher B. Bingham,et al.  The Process of Schema Emergence: Assimilation, Deconstruction, Unitization and the Plurality of Analogies , 2013 .

[85]  M. Lounsbury,et al.  Category currency: The changing value of conformity as a function of ongoing meaning construction , 2010 .