The Importance of the Scaffold for de Novo Enzymes: A Case Study with Kemp Eliminase.

We report electric field values relevant to the reactant and transition states of designed Kemp eliminases KE07 and KE70 and their improved variants from laboratory directed evolution (LDE), using atomistic simulations with the AMOEBA polarizable force field. We find that the catalytic base residue contributes the most to the electric field stabilization of the transition state of the LDE variants of the KE07 and KE70 enzymes, whereas the electric fields of the remainder of the enzyme and solvent disfavor the catalytic reaction in both cases. By contrast, we show that the electrostatic environment plays a large and stabilizing role for the naturally occurring enzyme ketosteroid isomerase (KSI). These results suggest that LDE is ultimately a limited strategy for improving de novo enzymes since it is largely restricted to optimization of chemical positioning in the active site, thus yielding a ∼3 order magnitude improvement over the uncatalyzed reaction, which we suggest may be an absolute upper bound estimate based on LDE applied to comparable de novo Kemp eliminases and other enzymes like KSI. Instead de novo enzymatic reactions could more productively benefit from optimization of the electrostatics of the protein scaffold in early stages of the computational design, utilizing electric field optimization as guidance.

[1]  Ivan V Korendovych,et al.  Catalytic efficiency of designed catalytic proteins. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.

[2]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  The role of reorganization energy in rational enzyme design. , 2014, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[3]  David Baker,et al.  Evolution of a designed retro-aldolase leads to complete active site remodeling , 2013, Nature chemical biology.

[4]  Yushan Zhu,et al.  Use of an Improved Matching Algorithm to Select Scaffolds for Enzyme Design Based on a Complex Active Site Model , 2016, PloS one.

[5]  G. Fields,et al.  Enzymatic turnover of macromolecules generates long-lasting protein–water-coupled motions beyond reaction steady state , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  David Baker,et al.  Optimization of the in-silico-designed kemp eliminase KE70 by computational design and directed evolution. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Eric A. Althoff,et al.  De Novo Computational Design of Retro-Aldol Enzymes , 2008, Science.

[8]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Enzyme-like proteins by computational design , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Roberto A. Chica,et al.  Iterative approach to computational enzyme design , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  D. Hilvert,et al.  Positional ordering of reacting groups contributes significantly to the efficiency of proton transfer at an antibody active site. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  David Baker,et al.  Bridging the gaps in design methodologies by evolutionary optimization of the stability and proficiency of designed Kemp eliminase KE59 , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  S. Boxer,et al.  Extreme electric fields power catalysis in the active site of ketosteroid isomerase , 2014, Science.

[13]  David Baker,et al.  Evolutionary optimization of computationally designed enzymes: Kemp eliminases of the KE07 series. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Engineering a model protein cavity to catalyze the Kemp elimination , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Luhua Lai,et al.  A novel method for enzyme design , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  S. Boxer,et al.  Measuring electric fields and noncovalent interactions using the vibrational stark effect. , 2015, Accounts of chemical research.

[17]  Alan R. Fersht,et al.  Directed evolution of new catalytic activity using the α/β-barrel scaffold , 2000, Nature.

[18]  Gregg B Fields,et al.  Correlated structural kinetics and retarded solvent dynamics at the metalloprotease active site , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[19]  A. Warshel,et al.  Electrostatic basis for enzyme catalysis. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[20]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  De novo design of biocatalysts. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[21]  Donald Hilvert,et al.  Precision is essential for efficient catalysis in an evolved Kemp eliminase , 2013, Nature.

[22]  Jonathan W Essex,et al.  Advanced Potential Energy Surfaces for Molecular Simulation. , 2016, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[23]  K N Houk,et al.  SABER: A computational method for identifying active sites for new reactions , 2012, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[24]  Birte Höcker,et al.  Automated scaffold selection for enzyme design , 2009, Proteins.

[25]  S. Boxer,et al.  Response to Comments on “Extreme electric fields power catalysis in the active site of ketosteroid isomerase” , 2015, Science.

[26]  D. Baker,et al.  Emergence of a catalytic tetrad during evolution of a highly active artificial aldolase , 2016, Nature Chemistry.

[27]  Romelia Salomón-Ferrer,et al.  Dynamics and dissipation in enzyme catalysis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  M. Fuxreiter,et al.  Optimization of reorganization energy drives evolution of the designed Kemp eliminase KE07. , 2013, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[29]  Eric A. Althoff,et al.  Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design , 2008, Nature.

[30]  Margaret E. Johnson,et al.  Current status of the AMOEBA polarizable force field. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[31]  Pengyu Y. Ren,et al.  Polarizable Atomic Multipole-based Molecular Mechanics for Organic Molecules. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[32]  Daniel W. Kulp,et al.  Design of a switchable eliminase , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  D. Herschlag,et al.  Evaluation of the Catalytic Contribution from a Positioned General Base in Ketosteroid Isomerase. , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[34]  A. Fersht,et al.  Rational modification of enzyme catalysis by engineering surface charge , 1987, Nature.

[35]  Teresa Head-Gordon,et al.  The role of side chain entropy and mutual information for improving the de novo design of Kemp eliminases KE07 and KE70. , 2016, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[36]  Jens Meiler,et al.  New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[37]  A. Warshel Electrostatic Origin of the Catalytic Power of Enzymes and the Role of Preorganized Active Sites* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  David Baker,et al.  Catalytic mechanism and performance of computationally designed enzymes for Kemp elimination. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[39]  Deliang Chen,et al.  Comment on “Extreme electric fields power catalysis in the active site of ketosteroid isomerase” , 2015, Science.

[40]  Teresa Head-Gordon,et al.  A monte carlo method for generating side chain structural ensembles. , 2015, Structure.

[41]  D. Herschlag,et al.  Comment on “Extreme electric fields power catalysis in the active site of ketosteroid isomerase” , 2015, Science.

[42]  S. Boxer,et al.  A Critical Test of the Electrostatic Contribution to Catalysis with Noncanonical Amino Acids in Ketosteroid Isomerase. , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[43]  S. Benkovic,et al.  Probing the Electrostatics of Active Site Microenvironments along the Catalytic Cycle for Escherichia coli Dihydrofolate Reductase , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[44]  D. Hilvert,et al.  Nonspecific medium effects versus specific group positioning in the antibody and albumin catalysis of the base-promoted ring-opening reactions of benzisoxazoles. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[45]  Jory Z. Ruscio,et al.  The influence of protein dynamics on the success of computational enzyme design. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[46]  Frances H. Arnold,et al.  Design by Directed Evolution. , 1998 .