On the"Virtual" Reconstruction of Sound Quality of Trumpets

Summary In this paper the realisation of “virtual” wind instruments is analysed, in which the bores are treated as linear, invariant systems, characterised by their impulse responses. The “dry” excitation signal has been obtained from the output of the system, sampled through a microphone placed at the flaring bell of a trumpet, by convolution with a proper inverse filter, obtained from the impulse response measured between the mouthpiece and the recording point. This “dry” excitation signal is the convolved with the impulse response of different wind instruments, thus reproducing the sound of “virtual” instruments. By comparing the results of very similar and much more different instruments, it was possible to conclude that this method makes it possible to finely distinguish between subtle timbric difference among different trumpets. This is due to the fact that the excitation signal remains always exactly the same, whilst when an human performer plays on different instruments, he always compensates for the different response of each instrument, making the differences less audible, and often the execution is strongly modified by this unavoidable feedback. The aim of this work is multiple: the “virtual” instruments can be used in subjective listening tests for the comparison of the “sound quality” of different instruments, for the evaluation of (real or simulated) restoration of ancient instruments, and for preliminary listening tests with newly designed ones, before they are actually built. For validating the repeatability of the technique, a blind subjective listening test has been performed. Three different trumpets and a silver-flute have been analysed, and compared with each other. The statistical analysis of the listening tests confirmed the excellent similarity between the direct acoustic recording and the result of the convolution technique.

[1]  Angelo Farina,et al.  STANDING WAVE TUBE TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING THE NORMAL INCIDENCE ABSORPTION COEFFICIENT : COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT EXPERIMENTAL SETUPS , 2000 .

[2]  Angelo Farina,et al.  Acoustic characterisation of “virtual” musical instruments: Using MLS technique on ancient violins* , 1998 .

[3]  Philip A. Nelson,et al.  Design of Cross-Talk Cancellation Networks by Using Fast Deconvolution , 1999 .

[4]  John Vanderkooy,et al.  Transfer-Function Measurement with Maximum-Length Sequences , 1989 .

[5]  Alessandro Cocchi,et al.  A virtual reconstruction of the trumpet , 1999 .

[6]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Digital Signal Processing , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  John Mourjopoulos,et al.  Spectral, Phase, and Transient Equalization for Audio Systems , 1985 .

[8]  Angelo Farina,et al.  Subjective Comparison Between Stereo Dipole and 3D Ambisonic Surround Systems for Automotive Applications , 1999 .

[9]  Philip A. Nelson,et al.  Digital Filter Design for Virtual Source Imaging Systems , 1998 .

[10]  Per Rubak,et al.  Analysis of ill-conditioning of multi-channel deconvolution problems , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics. WASPAA'99 (Cat. No.99TH8452).

[11]  Angelo Farina,et al.  Software Implementation of an MLS Analyzer with Tools for Convolution, Auralization and Inverse Filtering , 1997 .

[12]  Angelo Farina,et al.  Simultaneous Measurement of Impulse Response and Distortion with a Swept-Sine Technique , 2000 .

[13]  John Mourjopoulos,et al.  A comparative study of least-squares and homomorphic techniques for the inversion of mixed phase signals , 1982, ICASSP.