Understanding safety critical interactions between bicycles and motor vehicles in Europe by means of Naturalistic Driving techniques

Although prevention of bicycle–motorized-vehicle-crashes will result in significant improvements in bicycle mortality rates, little is known about the actual safety critical events leading up to these crashes. Recently, the understanding of critical events has been advanced by the use of Naturalistic driving techniques. This technique gathers data about driving in ‘natural conditions’ by means of the instrumentation of a large fleet of cars with sensors and cameras. To date, these studies have mainly focussed on car-car interactions rather than on interactions with vulnerable road users. This paper discusses the potential of Naturalistic Driving for understanding critical interactions with vulnerable road users. To this end it presents some of the results from additional analysis of the data from previous Naturalistic Driving studies. In addition, the paper presents the objectives and design of the recently started large scale Naturalistic Driving study UDRIVE in which a large fleet of motorized vehicles will be equipped with cameras and sensors, resulting in data on 470 years of driving. In contrast to previous and ongoing Naturalistic Driving studies, UDRIVE is – amongst other issues- specifically designed to address interactions with cyclists and pedestrians.

[1]  P L Jacobsen,et al.  Who owns the roads? How motorised traffic discourages walking and bicycling , 2009, Injury Prevention.

[2]  Dietmar Otte,et al.  Injury protection and accident causation parameters for vulnerable road users based on German In-Depth Accident Study GIDAS. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  P. Jacobsen Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling , 2003, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[4]  Fan Zhang,et al.  How to make more cycling good for road safety? , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Marika Hoedemaeker,et al.  The Value of Combining Naturalistic Driving Observations with Site-Based Observations: A Pilot Study on the Right-Turn Maneuver , 2012 .

[6]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Phase II – Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment , 2006 .

[7]  T. Dingus,et al.  The effect of passengers and risk-taking friends on risky driving and crashes/near crashes among novice teenagers. , 2011, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[8]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Design of the In-Vehicle Driving Behavior and Crash Risk Study: In Support of the SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study , 2011 .

[9]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2006 .