论文信息 - How geographic was GikiCLEF?: a GIR-critical review - 字舞流文

How geographic was GikiCLEF?: a GIR-critical review

In this paper we draw a balance of GikiCLEF as far as its appropriateness for the evaluation of GIR systems is concerned. We measure its degree of dealing with geographic matter, and offer GIRA, the final resource, for GIR evaluation purposes.

Diana Santos | Nuno Cardoso | Luís Miguel Cabral

[1] Nuno Cardoso. GikiCLEF Topics and Wikipedia Articles: Did They Blend? , 2009, CLEF.

[2] Sven Hartrumpf,et al. GikiP at GeoCLEF 2008: Joining GIR and QA Forces for Querying Wikipedia , 2008, CLEF.

[3] Diana Santos,et al. GikiCLEF: Crosscultural Issues in an International Setting: Asking non-English-centered Questions to Wikipedia , 2009, CLEF.

[4] Diana Santos,et al. GikiCLEF: Expectations and Lessons Learned , 2009, CLEF.

[5] Fredric C. Gey,et al. GeoCLEF 2008: the CLEF 2008 Cross-Language Geographic Information Retrieval Track Overview , 2008, CLEF.

[6] Diana Santos,et al. GikiP: evaluating geographical answers from wikipedia , 2008, GIR '08.

[7] Fredric C. Gey,et al. GeoCLEF 2008: the CLEF 2008 Cross-Language Geographic Information Retrieval Track Overview , 2008, Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum.