Quality assessment process for dynamic geometry resources in Intergeo project

One of the objectives of the Intergeo project was to provide European mathematics teachers with “good quality” pedagogical material supporting the use of dynamic geometry software in classrooms. With this aim in view, an online repository/platform was developed to gather various dynamic geometry resources, based on the idea of a teachers’ community feeding the repository, (re)using available resources and sharing practices related to the use of dynamic geometry in classrooms. The repository is thus open to contributions of any user who can deposit, browse, download and use resources, which naturally raises the question how to handle the resource quality issue in such an open environment. This paper reports on the way we tackled this issue in the Intergeo project. We first explain what we mean by a “good quality” dynamic geometry resource. We then provide a rationale behind the design of a questionnaire, the main tool for resource quality reviews, which are at the core of the quality assessment process implemented in the repository. Several experiments carried out with groups of teachers in order to confront our research-based view of the resource quality with the teachers’ one and to observe teachers’ usages of the quality assessment process are also reported in the paper. The outcomes of these experiments highlight strengths and limitations of the resource quality assessment process. They also tend to show that the idea of involving teachers into the resource quality assessment is a promising way of stimulating the use of dynamic geometry in classrooms, provided that teachers benefit from a support to make the quality process their own.

[1]  Jana Trgalova,et al.  QUALITY PROCESS FOR DYNAMIC GEOMETRY RESOURCES: THE INTERGEO PROJECT , 2009 .

[2]  Colette Laborde,et al.  Place and use of new technology in the teaching of mathematics: ICMI activities in the past 25 years , 2010 .

[3]  G. Brousseau Theory of didactical situations in mathematics , 1997 .

[4]  J. Little Teachers’ Professional Development in a Climate of Educational Reform , 1993 .

[5]  Luc Trouche,et al.  The Complex Process of Converting Tools into Mathematical Instruments: The Case of Calculators , 1998, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[6]  M. Mariotti Introduction to Proof: The Mediation of a Dynamic Software Environment , 2000 .

[7]  Michèle Artigue,et al.  Learning Mathematics in a CAS Environment: The Genesis of a Reflection about Instrumentation and the Dialectics between Technical and Conceptual Work , 2002, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[8]  Jean-Michel Gelis,et al.  La dialectique ancien-nouveau dans l'intégration de Cabri-géomètre à l'école primaire , 2002 .

[9]  Brian L. Hawkins,et al.  The Myth about Students. , 2005 .

[10]  Simon. Messer,et al.  Recent research developments in learning technologies , 2006 .

[11]  Annaïg Mahé,et al.  Description et évaluation des ressources pédagogiques : quels modèles ? , 2006 .

[12]  Paul Drijvers,et al.  Handheld technology for mathematics education: flashback into the future , 2010 .

[13]  K.P.E. Gravemeijer,et al.  The teacher and the tool: instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom , 2010 .

[14]  Jill Adler,et al.  Conceptualising Resources as a Theme for Teacher Education , 2000 .

[15]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[16]  Ulrich Kortenkamp,et al.  INTEROPERABLE INTERACTIVE GEOMETRY FOR EUROPE - FIRST TECHNOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL RESULTS AND FUTURE CHALLENGES OF THE INTERGEO PROJECT , 2009 .

[17]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[18]  John Monaghan,et al.  Working with Teachers: Context and Culture , 2009 .

[19]  John Monaghan,et al.  Teachers’ Activities in Technology-Based Mathematics Lessons , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[20]  Yves Chevallard,et al.  Concepts fondamentaux de la didactique : perspectives apportées par une approche anthropologique , 1991 .

[21]  G. Gueudet,et al.  Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? , 2009 .

[22]  Colette Laborde,et al.  Integration of Technology in the Design of Geometry Tasks with Cabri-Geometry , 2002, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[23]  David Wiley,et al.  Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy , 2000 .